Nahas in Trouble

[eliminator]

Agree Nahas's forward pressure was very good yesterday as was his leads. When he ran literally 100metres to spoil that was fantastic. His speed is his main asset as well as his tackling. Needs to use his speed more often to the advantage of the team

[Coach]

Nahas at his best is better than Edwards. Edwards at his best is a pretty good player. Normally both of them are average players and Nahas gets pushed off the ball way too easily like Tigra said. It would be good if Mitch Morton had a defensive side. he would be a gun half forward if he did. but we are stuck with pygmies

[1965]

Nahas at his best is better than Edwards. Edwards at his best is a pretty good player. Normally both of them are average players and Nahas gets pushed off the ball way too easily like Tigra said. It would be good if Mitch Morton had a defensive side. he would be a gun half forward if he did. but we are stuck with pygmies

WTF has Mitch got to do with anything?

 

[Coach]

Nahas at his best is better than Edwards. Edwards at his best is a pretty good player. Normally both of them are average players and Nahas gets pushed off the ball way too easily like Tigra said. It would be good if Mitch Morton had a defensive side. he would be a gun half forward if he did. but we are stuck with pygmies

WTF has Mitch got to do with anything?

 

You're not very smart. This discussion is about undersized forwards. You are aware that Mitch Morton played a lot of football for the Richmond football club? You are aware that he's 185cm tall and 80+ kgs? I'm saying it's a shame he doesn't have a defensive side. If he did then he'd be playing some good footy for us right now.

Do you understand that, guy?

[1965]

Since when have you become an expert?

You're (or is that your) just a punter like the rest of us.

Tell me, have you actually coached a team?

 

[Coach]

Since when have you become an expert?

You're (or is that your) just a punter like the rest of us.

Tell me, have you actually coached a team?

 

I'm not an expert but I reckon my comments are not fair off the mark here, 65'. What problem do you have with my post? Morton was a good forward. His goal kicking record proves that. What he lacked was a defensive side to his game. Now I would have thought that if he had a defensive side he would be a quite a good player. It would be a pleasant change from blokes like Nahas & Edwards offering very little in the air and when it comes to competing for the hard ball.
Do you agree or disagree? If you disagree then state why. It's called debating. Although it seems you're not capable of serious football discussion most of the time.

Why should we listen to a bloke that thinks Brett Deledio can't play midfield?

[yellowandback]

I like Nahas when he gets busy.
And I'm not talking downtown either 

[1965]

Since when have you become an expert?

You're (or is that your) just a punter like the rest of us.

Tell me, have you actually coached a team?

 

I'm not an expert but I reckon my comments are not fair off the mark here, 65'. What problem do you have with my post? Morton was a good forward. His goal kicking record proves that. What he lacked was a defensive side to his game. Now I would have thought that if he had a defensive side he would be a quite a good player. It would be a pleasant change from blokes like Nahas & Edwards offering very little in the air and when it comes to competing for the hard ball.
Do you agree or disagree? If you disagree then state why. It's called debating. Although it seems you're not capable of serious football discussion most of the time.

Why should we listen to a bloke that thinks Brett Deledio can't play midfield?

Once again WTF has Morton got to do with anything?

[Coach]

Since when have you become an expert?

You're (or is that your) just a punter like the rest of us.

Tell me, have you actually coached a team?

 

I'm not an expert but I reckon my comments are not fair off the mark here, 65'. What problem do you have with my post? Morton was a good forward. His goal kicking record proves that. What he lacked was a defensive side to his game. Now I would have thought that if he had a defensive side he would be a quite a good player. It would be a pleasant change from blokes like Nahas & Edwards offering very little in the air and when it comes to competing for the hard ball.
Do you agree or disagree? If you disagree then state why. It's called debating. Although it seems you're not capable of serious football discussion most of the time.

Why should we listen to a bloke that thinks Brett Deledio can't play midfield?

Once again WTF has Morton got to do with anything?

Classic, 65'. Can't debate the point. Pop in over at the Collins/Grigg thread and ask everyone what Collins has to do with anything. Make sure a former player never gets mentioned in any other thread too.

Cheers!
The Coach

[1965]

so we traded Morton for Nahas and Edwards??

 

[Coach]

so we traded Morton for Nahas and Edwards??

 

Did we trade Jay Schulz for Brad Miller? The longer this goes on the worse it looks for you, dude.

[1965]

so we traded Morton for Nahas and Edwards??

 

Did we trade Jay Schulz for Brad Miller? The longer this goes on the worse it looks for you, dude.

Once again, WTF?

[Go Richo 12]

I thought Nahas' pressure in the forward 50 was excellent yesterday.

Don't be silly......trade him..... , no good at all apparently..go figure.

Honestly, apparently he is no good but we should trade him, Edwards is no good either but untradeable.....go figure...

Some people believe it better to trade a player who has currency, hence the 'trade Nahas' calls. Some people believe a player who has no currency is not worth trading, hence the 'don't trade' Edwards calls.
IMO, keep Nahas and Edwards. There are few more on our list that will go or need to go before them two. That is not a ringing endorsement of those two but an illustration of our lack depth.

[Coach]

so we traded Morton for Nahas and Edwards??

 

Did we trade Jay Schulz for Brad Miller? The longer this goes on the worse it looks for you, dude.

Once again, WTF?

How come you're not telling everyone that Wallace has nothing to do with Richmond in the Vickery thread? Your inconsistency is your downfall, 65'. Please stop this.

How come you think Deledio is a poor player?

[WA Tiger]

I thought Nahas' pressure in the forward 50 was excellent yesterday.

Don't be silly......trade him..... , no good at all apparently..go figure.

Honestly, apparently he is no good but we should trade him, Edwards is no good either but untradeable.....go figure...

Some people believe it better to trade a player who has currency, hence the 'trade Nahas' calls. Some people believe a player who has no currency is not worth trading, hence the 'don't trade' Edwards calls.
IMO, keep Nahas and Edwards. There are few more on our list that will go or need to go before them two. That is not a ringing endorsement of those two but an illustration of our lack depth.

Don't try to have a blew with me GR12 just cause CD and 65 are at it.... ..