Author Topic: Cloke??  (Read 120451 times)

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #600 on: August 12, 2012, 11:20:53 AM »
Camerons an overated dud

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #601 on: August 12, 2012, 12:11:43 PM »
Played ok yesterday TM.  FWIW I think he will become a decent player and would be a good get (cost-wise) while he is still young.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #602 on: August 12, 2012, 12:16:54 PM »
Played ok yesterday TM.  FWIW I think he will become a decent player and would be a good get (cost-wise) while he is still young.

We talking about Jeremey Cameron from GWS smokey?

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #603 on: August 12, 2012, 12:46:35 PM »
I am.  Is there another Cameron I'm getting confused with?

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #604 on: August 12, 2012, 01:04:22 PM »
Played ok yesterday TM.  FWIW I think he will become a decent player and would be a good get (cost-wise) while he is still young.

Back to topic, I have it on good authority that if he wasnt taken as a prelisted 17 y/o, he would have likely been pick 1 ahead of Paton. He wouldnt be cheap and GWS would sell every staff members own mother to keep him. Hes the real deal and will be one of the premier power fwds in the comp. Dont worry about the rubbish I posted earlier ;)  that was just for chucky17 who keeps telling me what a lazy overated hack Cameron is.  :shh

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #605 on: August 12, 2012, 01:06:45 PM »
 :lol

Didn't pick up on the fishing smiley!  Thought you might be underestimating him slightly.   :thumbsup

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #606 on: August 12, 2012, 02:40:23 PM »
Can play both ends and wing. Richoesque tank. Hands like a steel trap. Dead eye dick. Whoa  :shh

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #607 on: August 12, 2012, 06:09:07 PM »
Can play both ends and wing. Richoesque tank. Hands like a steel trap. Dead eye dick. Whoa  :shh

Prodigy Gerks? Whoa, just whoa partner
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #608 on: August 12, 2012, 09:23:10 PM »
We need a fair dinkum key forward. Targets: Clokey, Cameron & Schulz.

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #609 on: August 12, 2012, 09:43:37 PM »
Patton is better than Cameron

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #610 on: August 12, 2012, 09:45:03 PM »
Patton is better than Cameron

Yeah, right.

;D

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #611 on: August 13, 2012, 12:04:25 AM »
I am.  Is there another Cameron I'm getting confused with?

Craig. Big bodies bullocking type. Reckons he might be able to play CHF next year if he can't get McGuane to agree to a 4-year deal.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98042
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #612 on: August 16, 2012, 02:18:37 AM »
According to Whispers on 3aw last night, Melbourne are now willing to offer Cloke $7.1m on a 7 year deal.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #613 on: August 16, 2012, 06:24:31 AM »
According to Whispers on 3aw last night, Melbourne are now willing to offer Cloke $7.1m on a 7 year deal.

Cool, so they're gonna have a 2mil a year fwd line.
What's left for the midfield that they don't have? Or young defenders when come of age??
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Cloke??
« Reply #614 on: August 16, 2012, 08:37:40 AM »
According to Whispers on 3aw last night, Melbourne are now willing to offer Cloke $7.1m on a 7 year deal.

Cool, so they're gonna have a 2mil a year fwd line.
What's left for the midfield that they don't have? Or young defenders when come of age??

Who cares?  A team well placed for salary cap room will be looking at Trengrove, Frawley and Grimes, and licking their chops in anticipation.