wern't you the one saying griffiths was gifted a game because he hadnt been in the bests at coburg?
yes i was stating a fact and some nuff nuff argued that he had performed.. am i wrong nope. the mantra from the club was kids have to perform before getting a game.do you read posts on griffiths ive said two things constantly.
1/ he did not get a game based on performances. that is a fact. he did little at coburg but i was not against him getting a game i just argued he didnt earn it.
2/ seeing as how we could gift griffiths a game why couldnt we do the same for others. rather than let abysmal performances like vickerys be rewarded week after with game after game.
sorry if you dont read posts bud or get so caught up defending everything they do you cant comprehend. hmm i suppose you still think theres no replacement for vickery.
you're judgements are made on nothing else but reading internet forums... how can you make any sort of educated judgement..
You dont attend games..
Griff has huge upside and if he was doing his job and following his instructions at Coburg, then he gets a game, whether he's in the bests or not.. The best arent a great reflection of how the guy is playing anyway.. Having been to plenty of Coburg games i wouldnt put to much cred on who they name in the bests, especially when it comes to a backman.. The Goo was named in the bests plenty last year and he was crap
Coburg isnt there to win a Richmond premiership, its there to develop young players and give the older players somewhere to have a kick when they dont get a game for Richmond.. i couldnt give a flying fox if Coburg win or lose.. until we get our own 2nds side..
