Author Topic: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]  (Read 19227 times)

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Member replacement game this Saturday
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2012, 06:08:11 PM »
Yo RFCO, what are the chances of getting straight with supporters re: Foley's injury?
Your silence is deafening.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Member replacement game this Saturday
« Reply #16 on: July 03, 2012, 06:12:15 PM »
You really want to know? Get in touch with RonnieB (if you can find him). He knows everything Foley. It is rumoured that Ron told everyone that Nathan is finished. Sad but if Ron said that...

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98244
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #17 on: July 03, 2012, 06:28:34 PM »
The AFL site is tipping us to win by 5 goals ...


Preview: Melbourne v Richmond
By Peter Ryan and Paul Daffey
03/07/2012


WHERE AND WHEN: MCG, Saturday July 7, 2.15pm
LAST TIME: Richmond 20.13 (133) d Melbourne 11.8 (74), round three, 2011, at the MCG


A must-win for the Tigers after two disappointing losses in the past three games that have kept them among the pack chasing a spot in the lower reaches of the eight. Although the Demons are more organised now than when the teams met earlier in the season, shocking luck with injury has made them vulnerable. Promising young defender Tom McDonald is the latest casualty, coming on top of the season-ending injury to forward Mitch Clark. The Tigers midfield should be too good again, able to catch the Demons on the spread and generate opportunities up forward for Jack Riewoldt.

THE FOUR POINTS

MELBOURNE

1. Although Melbourne recorded more inside 50s than the Lions last week it was found wanting up forward without Clark. While Jared Rivers and Colin Garland battled hard, the Demons had to scramble for goals and were punished after turnovers. Melbourne is functioning as a unit much better now, but they are undermanned.

2. James Frawley and Riewoldt always have intriguing battles. Frawley remains the Demons' most reliable defender, particularly with Rivers forward. To subdue Riewoldt however he will be reliant on the midfield applying pressure, an area in which Melbourne has improved in the past month. In the absence of McDonald, Rivers might have to return to defence.

3. How can Melbourne manufacture goals without Clark as a marking forward? It managed to kick three of its eight goals from marks inside 50 last round, and while many entries were rushed and its makeshift forwards battled hard, it could not crumb goals. It will need to bring the same intensity of effort it brought to the first quarter last week and hope it can convert the entries into scoreboard pressure to stay in the game.

4. Beaten on the spread last week, the Demons might try to lock down Trent Cotchin with Jack Trengove and send Jordie McKenzie to Brett Deledio. If Cotchin goes forward, Daniel Nicholson can sit on him and rotate Trengove through the back half as a spare. It sounds defensive but the Dees were blown away in eight minutes of football in round three. They can't let that happen again.

RICHMOND
1. Richmond's loss against Adelaide marked yet another defeat after the Tigers had been in a winning position. It's happened against almost every strong team this season, although not, as in this case, when they'd kicked eight goals in the opening quarter and led by 33 points at the first break. The Tigers need to be better at closing teams down. If they're to challenge for the eight, it should start this week.

2. Dustin Martin receives a lot of attention for being a young bull, but this season he's been an inconsistent one. For most of the season he's been more intent on doing an exaggerated wind-up and trying to kick as long as possible rather than trying to pick out a teammate. On Saturday he returned to form, getting 23 disposals and kicking three goals. The Tigers will be hoping he remains on track this week and thereafter.

3. Jack Watts has become a key since becoming a half-back sweeper. It'll be interesting to see whether the Tigers assign a defensive half-forward to try to curb his influence. Shaun Grigg might be a candidate. More likely, they'll play three tall forwards to try to stretch the Demons. Tyrone Vickery, Todd Elton, Jayden Post or Brett O'Hanlon could all play as a third tall forward behind Riewoldt and Brad Miller.

4. Richmond was in front against Adelaide when it won the contested ball. Adelaide wrested the authority back over the last three quarters by winning the contested ball. Inside work is not the Tigers' strength; they're better on the outside, where they can use their handball to hare through the middle and their precise kicking skills to pick out a teammate. For all Melbourne's woes this season, it's been reasonable at winning the contested ball. The Tigers will do well to knuckle down in the packs if they want to stay in the hunt for a final-eight spot.

AFL.com.au prediction: Richmond by 32 points

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #18 on: July 03, 2012, 06:30:18 PM »
Why are there two threads on replacement game ::)


OE: They've now been merged  :police:
« Last Edit: July 03, 2012, 06:51:03 PM by one-eyed »
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #19 on: July 03, 2012, 06:31:26 PM »
Why are there two threads on replacement game ::)

:clapping

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98244
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2012, 03:16:29 AM »
Despite the 7 changes and all the outs, the bookies and journos still have us as clear favourites ....

Betting Odds (TAB Sportsbet)

Richmond   $ 1.20
Melbourne   $ 4.60

Line at 33.5 pts.


Media experts tips

Herald-Sun   29-0
The Age       21-2 ..... Greg Baum and Scot Spits have tipped the Dees.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #22 on: July 06, 2012, 12:55:19 PM »
Haha.....God, the Dees will go into this game thinking they can win, we will go in mentally weak again and they will do us...

Even if we win I won't be taking anything out of it! Last weeks game if we had won I would be up and about, but now pfft!!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #23 on: July 06, 2012, 01:08:35 PM »
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline rogerd3

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #24 on: July 06, 2012, 01:19:43 PM »
Haha.....God, the Dees will go into this game thinking they can win, we will go in mentally weak again and they will do us...

Even if we win I won't be taking anything out of it! Last weeks game if we had won I would be up and about, but now pfft!!

why wouldnt you take anything
out of a win on Saturday. :gotigers


Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #25 on: July 06, 2012, 01:31:19 PM »
Haha.....God, the Dees will go into this game thinking they can win, we will go in mentally weak again and they will do us...

Even if we win I won't be taking anything out of it! Last weeks game if we had won I would be up and about, but now pfft!!

why wouldnt you take anything
out of a win on Saturday. :gotigers

Did you take more out of the win against the Saints or the Giants????

That's why....
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #26 on: July 06, 2012, 01:37:36 PM »





Here is the AFL version for some. :thumbsup

Promises, Excuses
Had enough of your annual spruces

100 a year
stuffing my ears

I want a win
tackles and shepherds and one percenters

I want them now

Pass me the ball
Give me the ball
Long kicks and short ones loopy old handballs
I want them now
Don't care how

I want the cup
So I can sit there and strut
It is my birthright
Is that allright
Give it to me now
I don't care how

Development youth and giving them games
That's just a shame
Garbage excuses and pathetic uses
No more recycled and hack player losers
I want the cup don't care how
Give it to me now

Give me the flag
Don't wait and lag
Victories aplenty and a premiership medallion
Maybe I should shut up and start following Essendon.
I don't care how
Give me the flag now


Cue Willy Wonka playing a flute
and a couple of oompa loompas. :thumbsup

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #27 on: July 06, 2012, 01:46:25 PM »
Haha.....God, the Dees will go into this game thinking they can win, we will go in mentally weak again and they will do us...

Even if we win I won't be taking anything out of it! Last weeks game if we had won I would be up and about, but now pfft!!

why wouldnt you take anything
out of a win on Saturday. :gotigers

Did you take more out of the win against the Saints or the Giants????

That's why....

But by your words we are mentally weak that's why we'll lose, so if we win shouldn't you take out of the game that we are not mentally weak?

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #28 on: July 06, 2012, 01:51:21 PM »
Tucker on fire  :cheers

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #29 on: July 06, 2012, 01:56:26 PM »





Here is the AFL version for some. :thumbsup

Promises, Excuses
Had enough of your annual spruces

100 a year
stuffing my ears

I want a win
tackles and shepherds and one percenters

I want them now

Pass me the ball
Give me the ball
Long kicks and short ones loopy old handballs
I want them now
Don't care how

I want the cup
So I can sit there and strut
It is my birthright
Is that allright
Give it to me now
I don't care how

Development youth and giving them games
That's just a shame
Garbage excuses and pathetic uses
No more recycled and hack player losers
I want the cup don't care how
Give it to me now

Give me the flag
Don't wait and lag
Victories aplenty and a premiership medallion
Maybe I should shut up and start following Essendon.
I don't care how
Give me the flag now


Cue Willy Wonka playing a flute
and a couple of oompa loompas. :thumbsup
;D
nice work tucker.

just need someone to dub it over;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRTkCHE1sS4
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI