Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 331601 times)

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1830 on: October 17, 2014, 06:53:16 PM »

We haven't failed in years with our first pick. The closest I would suggest is two solid players in Conca and Vickery who are still developing. Jack, Rance, Cotch, Dusty and Vlaustin are all successes. Lennon is too young to judge. I have faith in getting a good player with our first pick....our later picks, well that's another matter  :shh
hmm jon, vickery, and conca are not successes for where they were taken and the time they have had. the clock is ticking . as for vlastuin well hes coming off second yr blues where he was terrible at times. for the life of me how anyone can claim him a success yet is beyond me.
ellis has issues and rance has had em.
coupoled with abysmal failure in the following rounds of the nd and i really am bemused at how jackson is immune from criticism. ffs hes had 10 yrs and he can only hang his hat on a handful of players.
yep lets go to the nd well and back fj in. its utter stupidity tantamoubt to putting oines head in the sand. ah only at richmond.
Vickery and Conca so far are solid so I wouldn't call them failures and JON is going a long way back now  :lol. Reckon given what Vlaustin has shown in his first two years (yes he had some down moments but still had some up moments too) he is a success at least for now. Everything can change...
At pick 6 Conca is a fail. Could possibly  it around but IMO he just has to many deficiencies. If he was pick 45ish he would be an ok pick up. He is a run with player at best I recon.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1831 on: October 17, 2014, 07:13:19 PM »
Putting things like gameplan, list management, selection & matchday tactics aside for the moment, for me the canary in the mineshaft will be if there's no real and sustained change in mindset from our players in relation to things like two-way running, chasing, tackling & shepherding or any noticeble improvement in fitness. If, going into their sixth season, these fundamental areas are still not improved upon then it will tell us they never will be under the current coaching regime and that regime needs to be removed a.s.a.p.
Spot on. They're basics at the top 4 clubs except possibly Norf. 

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2484
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1832 on: October 26, 2014, 08:49:13 PM »
Say we flunk next year and Hardwick gets the boot. Would you take Bomber Thompson on? IMHO I would even given his issues.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1833 on: October 26, 2014, 09:01:16 PM »
Say we flunk next year and Hardwick gets the boot. Would you take Bomber Thompson on? IMHO I would even given his issues.
lets just say I know people who know him. I would stay clear.  He is a loose canon. Rather Choco Williams.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1834 on: October 26, 2014, 09:21:40 PM »
Woosha Worsfold or Voss.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1835 on: October 26, 2014, 09:24:25 PM »
Woosha Worsfold or Voss.
Funny you mention Vossy. I wouldn't be surprised if he takes over next.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1836 on: October 26, 2014, 10:08:44 PM »
Woosha Worsfold or Voss.
lol , great credentials ,   both finished leaving their clubs a train wreck  :lol yeah lets get em  ::)
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1837 on: October 26, 2014, 11:52:04 PM »
Turn it up Bojo, the Whoosh is a premiership coach with a strike rate over 53%.

Voss was always going to be a good coach, just needed an apprenticeship before he took the job on and he has that experience now.

Hardwick doesn't compare to either of them in terms of commanding respect.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1838 on: November 04, 2014, 02:08:29 PM »
Say the rucm kid talked about as top 3, is still there at 12

If hardwick games the car - does hardwick get the kid that could be the best player on the draft pool? Probably not cause he won't develop for three years.

Or do we reach for the fat slow inside mid? That'll do something asap

His job is on the line, he knows it.

All policy will be with short term thinkingbin mind.

Political Damien
You could ask why nobody picked him with the 11 previous picks too Bents! Are they all trying to save their jobs?
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1839 on: November 04, 2014, 02:50:07 PM »
Yeah, you could.

Yeah, most of them are

Online yandb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1840 on: November 04, 2014, 03:46:19 PM »
It was my understanding that after Terry was instrumental in the Jon and Mc muffin debacle that Richardson was brought in with a mandate to be aware of the coaches needs but not to compromise the list with our selections

Offline RedanTiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1841 on: November 04, 2014, 07:06:23 PM »
It was my understanding that after Terry was instrumental in the Jon and Mc muffin debacle that Richardson was brought in with a mandate to be aware of the coaches needs but not to compromise the list with our selections

Long time between JON/McMahon and Richardson.

Don't think there has been any limitation on "coach's picks" when you look at the picks from when Hardwick/Hartley started.
2010 - Grigg, Houli, Derrickx, Gourdis, Miller, Hislop, Jakobi.
2011 - I Maric, Morris, A Maric.
2012 - Knights, Chaplin, Edwards, Petterd, Lonergan, Stephenson.
2013 - Hampson, Gordon, Lloyd, Banfield, Miles, Thomas.
All older experienced players bought onto the list to fill holes the coach identified. 

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1842 on: November 23, 2014, 02:03:02 PM »
Say the rucm kid talked about as top 3, is still there at 12

If hardwick games the car - does hardwick get the kid that could be the best player on the draft pool? Probably not cause he won't develop for three years.

Or do we reach for the fat slow inside mid? That'll do something asap

His job is on the line, he knows it.

All policy will be with short term thinkingbin mind.

Political Damien
You could ask why nobody picked him with the 11 previous picks too Bents! Are they all trying to save their jobs?

Grundy  comes to mind

Everyone I think wanted him

But no one wanted to miss out on a mid for the good of next year and nt getting sacked


Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1843 on: November 27, 2014, 08:04:59 PM »
Please edit thread title to "Sack Jackson". Thanks.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1844 on: November 27, 2014, 08:21:22 PM »
Bomber / Voss ticket