Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 331655 times)

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1980 on: May 02, 2015, 04:22:31 PM »
If you lose by 10 goals it's a player issue..
If you lose by 10 points it's a coach issue..

Who told you that (and no bs about the old TAC or whatever days)

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4802
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1981 on: May 02, 2015, 04:23:18 PM »
Hardwick is not missing easy set shots at goal from 25 m out.

So called professional footballers are ....ones that are on over 500k a year.
Unleash the tornado

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1982 on: May 02, 2015, 04:31:58 PM »
Coached well in the first, didn't he.

Leave a did or two on Hawkins
Caracella and Balmey.

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1983 on: May 02, 2015, 04:37:32 PM »
Sweet baby Geez couldn't coach our team. How many people need to fealise it is our list managers at fault. Blair Hartley, Francis Jackson and Dan Richardson are all useless sacks of Sh t with zero undersranding of the modern game.

BTW, how come Matty Knights isnt our assistant coach?

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1984 on: May 02, 2015, 04:39:09 PM »
The whole lot of them are too blame

Who switches the play across ground & then has no-one to give it too up the ground, NO runners  :banghead
Who kicks it sideways  :banghead
Who slows down to kick when they are hot then get caught :banghead
Who handballs to a player when they are running along side the ball carrier.  :banghead
Who kicks too 2 on 1 contests.
Where are the crumbers at the 2 on 1 contests. They are 20-30 metres away :banghead
l could roll a whole list off of basic football faults with the game plan & players over working & over committing themselves.
OFF WITH SOME HEADS  :snidegrin

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1985 on: May 02, 2015, 04:40:44 PM »
Yeh they're all pooful but this is a hardwick thread.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5721
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1986 on: May 02, 2015, 04:56:34 PM »
Have a look at the dogs.

Have a clear direction and players that are relevant to the game plan.

Get with it RFC.
Go Tigers!

Offline Zlatan

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1987 on: May 02, 2015, 04:57:33 PM »
go dogs

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1988 on: May 02, 2015, 07:52:02 PM »
At the end of the day, all I care about are wins and premierships. If Stiffy can't deliver those two things, then he is a failure and needs to be moved on. Gale is kidding himself if he thinks we are all going to sit by year after year and continue to support mediocrity.

I couldn't care less about the stats he wants to point out or how special he thinks the group is or how good he thinks that they can play.

All of us members have done our part and contributed to this club being competitive off the field.

Start winning games or pee off. The rest doesn't matter.

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1989 on: May 02, 2015, 08:10:07 PM »
Have a look at the dogs.

Have a clear direction and players that are relevant to the game plan.

Get with it RFC.

Are the dogs the new yardstick ?

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1990 on: May 02, 2015, 09:11:48 PM »
I'd argue this was his worst performance in what has been a dismal year for him.

The game was played completely on Geelong's terms almost from start to finish. Geelong know we want to move the ball quick and launch from half back so what do they do?

Engineer Harry Taylor, one of the better intercept markers in the competition as a spare in defence, alternating with Corey Enright forcing us to go slow and wide. Meanwhile our spare took 13 mins to touch the ball.

What did we do? Sat and watched and kicked 2 goals in the first half.

We've got the best defender in the comp and they have one of the best couple of key forwards. So we sent our third best big defender to him and watched him eat him for a quarter and get the confidence of him and his team up, before doing the obvious at quarter time.

The Steve Morris saga continued. After finally seeing what was obvious to all and sending him back to defence, he bobs up forward again. Ok maybe Geelong didn't have a small forward for him to go to, although I'd have liked to see him with Motlop or Duncan but when it is clear him playing forward doesn't work why didn't we play one of the kids that got dropped instead?

Our ability to score was once again non existent, especially in the first half but for some reason Dustin didn't seem to spend anywhere near the time deep forward he usually does. In the final quarter when we needed to find quick goals our most likely prospect was floating around half back.

Grigg did a great job on Selwood in the first half, but at some point in the second half we decided to move him off and put Miles on him. Grigg generated some shaky disposals and did kick a goal in the last, but Selwood became the difference in the last quarter. As he does.

But the play that summed up Hardwick as a coach for me came at the end, after we kicked a goal to get back to within 2 with about a minute and a half or so to go.

Geelong, very predictably sent two back in defence. Now you'd expect the logical response would be to send more forwards to make it one-on-one all over the ground, but not our Damien. He just sat and let it roll. Sound familiar? We win the clearance and the Geelong spares mop it up and the brief chance we had is snuffed out.

We played a club that is on the wane today and had several good players out and Steve Johnson playing like he was on the take. We 'came to play' in Hardwick speak but didn't get it done because we were out-coached.

I would go as far as to say that if everything else remained constant from today and the coaches changed boxes, we win.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1991 on: May 02, 2015, 09:14:34 PM »
Have a look at the dogs.

Have a clear direction and players that are relevant to the game plan.

Get with it RFC.

Interesting that the dogs were a basket case late last Nov
Now back on track

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1992 on: May 02, 2015, 09:16:53 PM »
Have a look at the dogs.

Have a clear direction and players that are relevant to the game plan.

Get with it RFC.

Interesting that the dogs were a basket case late last Nov
Now back on track

It causes a pondering in ones soul

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1993 on: May 02, 2015, 09:17:04 PM »
In a way i was hoping for another 10 goal loss today and not some glorified loss

Dimwit is a dud coach. That much is evident. To keep FJ as his head recruiter shows he really has not got an eye for talent himself

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5721
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #1994 on: May 02, 2015, 09:35:20 PM »
Have a look at the dogs.

Have a clear direction and players that are relevant to the game plan.

Get with it RFC.

Are the dogs the new yardstick ?

What's a yardstick
Go Tigers!