Sack Hardwick [merged]

[Penelope]

damn, wasnt planning on doing either

[eliminator]

We won in spite of Hardwick not because of him.

Imagine Ross Lyon carrying on with the players on the field after a win like that as if they'd just made the GF. He'd probably be having a crack at the defenders for allowing Witts to take an uncontested mark for that last goal.

Agree. The decision not to start Rance on Cloke almost cost us the game.

[(•))(©™]

We won in spite of Hardwick not because of him.

Imagine Ross Lyon carrying on with the players on the field after a win like that as if they'd just made the GF. He'd probably be having a crack at the defenders for allowing Witts to take an uncontested mark for that last goal.

Agree. The decision not to start Rance on Cloke almost cost us the game.

Such a bad coach

[MintOnLamb]

We won in spite of Hardwick not because of him.

Imagine Ross Lyon carrying on with the players on the field after a win like that as if they'd just made the GF. He'd probably be having a crack at the defenders for allowing Witts to take an uncontested mark for that last goal.

Agree. The decision not to start Rance on Cloke almost cost us the game.

I heard he wanted to start morris on cloke but got talked out of it

Such a bad coach

[YellowandBlackBlood]

ah, its all your fault y&bb. stop putting such posts on the internet and we will win the premiership!

no the specific post but content with mediocrity philosophy in general

Mate, if you can't tell when someone is so obviously taking the pee, then there is no hope for you.

[Zlatan]

ah, its all your fault y&bb. stop putting such posts on the internet and we will win the premiership!

no the specific post but content with mediocrity philosophy in general

Mate, if you can't tell when someone is so obviously taking the pee, then there is no hope for you.

Poe's law, named after its author Nathan Poe,[1] is a literary adage which stipulates that, without a clear indicator of an author's intention, it is often impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of such extremism.[2] Someone will likely mistake the parody for a genuine article, or vice-versa.[3]

[Zlatan]

We won in spite of Hardwick not because of him.

Imagine Ross Lyon carrying on with the players on the field after a win like that as if they'd just made the GF. He'd probably be having a crack at the defenders for allowing Witts to take an uncontested mark for that last goal.

Agree. The decision not to start Rance on Cloke almost cost us the game.

Such a bad coach

dont play the aa CHB on the best forward

dont kick the ball to jack

kick to the pockets not the middle

grigg as a tagger

Lloyd as the tall forward

dont play kids for years

etc, etc,

 

[Chuck17]

Sack the bum

[YellowandBlackBlood]

Sack the bum

We were just waiting for the go ahead from you Chucky!

[Yeahright]

ah, its all your fault y&bb. stop putting such posts on the internet and we will win the premiership!

no the specific post but content with mediocrity philosophy in general

Mate, if you can't tell when someone is so obviously taking the pee, then there is no hope for you.

Does that mean you were baiting?

[YellowandBlackBlood]

ah, its all your fault y&bb. stop putting such posts on the internet and we will win the premiership!

no the specific post but content with mediocrity philosophy in general

Mate, if you can't tell when someone is so obviously taking the pee, then there is no hope for you.

Does that mean you were baiting?

Not by its strict definition. It was "just for the laffs" as they say in the classics!

[Yeahright]

 

BTW who else enjoyed seeing Reiwoldt, Rance, Maric and some actual midfielder play at the centre bounce?

[(•))(©™]

Just saw the great man on the news....
"Look, we're a better team than we've been showing and so are Port....."

Such a poo talker. 

[🏅Dooks]

Hurricane Hardwick spinning out of control

[Smokey]

ah, its all your fault y&bb. stop putting such posts on the internet and we will win the premiership!

no the specific post but content with mediocrity philosophy in general

Mate, if you can't tell when someone is so obviously taking the pee, then there is no hope for you.

Poe's law, named after its author Nathan Poe,[1] is a literary adage which stipulates that, without a clear indicator of an author's intention, it is often impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of such extremism.[2] Someone will likely mistake the parody for a genuine article, or vice-versa.[3]

I reckon that's the law that '65 applies when he reads the Age.