Sack Hardwick [merged]

[Ruanaidh]

did you get any enjoyment out of the win?

I enjoyed watching the back-line put in another cohesive effort. The forward line at least played team-orientated footy, for once.....meh...and the middle tried hard under the weight of being smashed in the Ruck. Maric obviously understood that he couldn't beat his opponents and was happy to askew their accuracy....and he did.....that brought a smile. What I really enjoyed though were the efforts of Vlaustin (again) and Foley....and the antics of the old Master on the sidelines. Mixed bag with a few more sherbets than usual I'd say. This is Richmond remember, It doesn't pay to get too effusive as disappointment may only be 1 week away.

 Did that answer your question Al?..... or was it rhetorical?

[Rampstar]

Im not smart enough to know what effusive means. Wheres 65 when you need him. No wonder Im hanging out in OER. I feel bad now. I may go and watch the replay again. 

[Ruanaidh]

Im not smart enough to know what effusive means. Wheres 65 when you need him. No wonder Im hanging out in OER. I feel bad now. I may go and watch the replay again. 

I just hope I spelt it right ....but, oh never mind my stalker/spell-checker 'Yeahright' will let me know soon enough if that is the case. 

[Smokey]

Im not smart enough to know what effusive means. Wheres 65 when you need him.

You should get a gig with Barry Hall on 360!   

[Dubstep Dookie]

Im not smart enough to know what effusive means. Wheres 65 when you need him. No wonder Im hanging out in OER. I feel bad now. I may go and watch the replay again. 

Try visiting the other pub. They'll tell you what effusive means it just might to be your detriment

[Yeahright]

Im not smart enough to know what effusive means. Wheres 65 when you need him. No wonder Im hanging out in OER. I feel bad now. I may go and watch the replay again. 

I just hope I spelt it right ....but, oh never mind my stalker/spell-checker 'Yeahright' will let me know soon enough if that is the case. 

Stalker? I replied to one of your posts  . Not usually a spell-checker but find it funny when someone plays the smart guy and insults someones intellect just to get it wrong themselves 

[Chuck17]

This thread is off topic and since Hardwick came out on top this thread is closed until next loss.

Please do not post here accordingly.

Thanks

[Ruanaidh]

Im not smart enough to know what effusive means. Wheres 65 when you need him. No wonder Im hanging out in OER. I feel bad now. I may go and watch the replay again. 

I just hope I spelt it right ....but, oh never mind my stalker/spell-checker 'Yeahright' will let me know soon enough if that is the case. 

Stalker? I replied to one of your posts  . Not usually a spell-checker but find it funny when someone plays the smart guy and insults someones intellect just to get it wrong themselves 

How did I know you would respond to a whistle? BTW I 'miss-wrote' a word.......but I was right-on the money regarding your intellect

[Ruanaidh]

This thread is off topic and since Hardwick came out on top this thread is closed until next loss.

Please do not post here accordingly.

Thanks

And ruin all the fish shooting barrel stuff.....no way.......

In any case I'll be off for a few days as I do a bit of Trekking with the boys. Havagoodweegend everyone ....including you Dimma.

[Yeahright]

Im not smart enough to know what effusive means. Wheres 65 when you need him. No wonder Im hanging out in OER. I feel bad now. I may go and watch the replay again. 

I just hope I spelt it right ....but, oh never mind my stalker/spell-checker 'Yeahright' will let me know soon enough if that is the case. 

Stalker? I replied to one of your posts  . Not usually a spell-checker but find it funny when someone plays the smart guy and insults someones intellect just to get it wrong themselves 

How did I know you would respond to a whistle? BTW I 'miss-wrote' a word.......but I was right-on the money regarding your intellect

You happened to post before I went through reading the threads, wow man you have some skills  . No point arguing with a pseudo intellect

[Tigers of Old]

Sack Hardwick. Yeah that'll do it.

[Penelope]

did you get any enjoyment out of the win?

I enjoyed watching the back-line put in another cohesive effort. The forward line at least played team-orientated footy, for once.....meh...and the middle tried hard under the weight of being smashed in the Ruck. Maric obviously understood that he couldn't beat his opponents and was happy to askew their accuracy....and he did.....that brought a smile. What I really enjoyed though were the efforts of Vlaustin (again) and Foley....and the antics of the old Master on the sidelines. Mixed bag with a few more sherbets than usual I'd say. This is Richmond remember, It doesn't pay to get too effusive as disappointment may only be 1 week away.

 Did that answer your question Al?..... or was it rhetorical?

nah it wasn't rhetorical and the length of the answer on it's own pretty much answered the question.

personally I just enjoy each and every win as it happens and leave the deep and critical investigation as to why the win wasn't really that good until later. you never know, but it just may the last you see.
 

[gerkin greg]

Sack Hardwick. Yeah that'll do it.

Typical Richmond assing about 

Need to move on this before Melbourne snap up Peter Rhodes or Terry Wallace 

[Coach]

It's Rhode

And I know for a fact he is staying true to Port

[gerkin greg]

it's definitely Paul Rhodes