Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 331673 times)

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3225 on: July 25, 2016, 08:35:35 PM »
Seriously, have u ever seen a bigger narcissist than this buffoon ?

Yes, I have.

Not including you
Caracella and Balmey.

Jackstar 1960

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3226 on: July 25, 2016, 08:38:40 PM »
What's Knighter up to these days?

Geelong at the moment

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3227 on: July 25, 2016, 08:42:31 PM »
Seriously, have u ever seen a bigger narcissist than this buffoon ?

Yes, I have.

Not including you
Wow, got me good there.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3228 on: July 25, 2016, 09:45:07 PM »
What's Knighter up to these days?

Geelong at the moment

Would have learnt a lot over the past few years.. :snidegrin
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3229 on: July 26, 2016, 11:49:02 AM »
If Hardwicks contract was not renewed - what gig could he expect to get at another club. For mine I don't think he would EVER get a senior coach role at another club,

Would there be any takers?

If no, then the question whether to sack him or not is a relatively simple one.

IMHO his player management, list management (@"The list is the best I have had in my time at RFC"), team selection (finals campaigns bringing in underdone players) and support staff management (list managers, support coaches, game day strategists) has been quite abysmal as is evident from the state of our playing list and position on the ladder.

7 years is a long time to get it right, I think he has had ample opportunity and at the end of next year it will be 8 years.

He has had his go, his KPI's must have all failed, let him have his final year to the detriment of the club, because lets be honest, his contract could not possibly be renewed unless he somehow manages to get us a finals win as a bare minimum next year.

Offline Harry

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1446
  • Fighting injustice and incompetence
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3230 on: July 26, 2016, 12:38:42 PM »
The only reason he will be there next year is because benny and peggy are too stubborn to admit they got it wrong.  No other reason.
Does anyone have half an idea on anything?

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3231 on: July 26, 2016, 01:43:38 PM »
The only reason he will be there next year is because benny and peggy are too stubborn to admit they got it wrong.  No other reason.

 :thumbsup
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3232 on: July 26, 2016, 02:53:12 PM »
The only reason he will be there next year is because benny and peggy are too stubborn to admit they got it wrong.  No other reason.

 :thumbsup

 :thumbsup :thumbsup

Defiant Richmond ...

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3233 on: July 26, 2016, 05:22:44 PM »
The only reason he will be there next year is because benny and peggy are too stubborn to admit they got it wrong.  No other reason.

 :thumbsup

 :thumbsup :thumbsup

Defiant Richmond ...

 :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

Sensitive and precious Richmond
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3234 on: July 29, 2016, 01:08:53 PM »
Why has chol played Zero times in a pruning year? Ditto Callum moore. Butler

Has Lennon been managed to the best possible standards? Menadue? McBean? Elton?

Why the hell was george dropped again

Why won't he put vlastuin in the middle

Should hardwick have shown more leadership. To help yarren and Mckenzie?
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Harry

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1446
  • Fighting injustice and incompetence
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3235 on: July 29, 2016, 01:57:23 PM »
Why has chol played Zero times in a pruning year? Ditto Callum moore. Butler

Has Lennon been managed to the best possible standards? Menadue? McBean? Elton?

Why the hell was george dropped again

Why won't he put vlastuin in the middle

Should hardwick have shown more leadership. To help yarren and Mckenzie?

All valid questions.  But it's more important to get games into hunt grigg and houli.  Also Peggy wants a strong finish to the season so we can be on top of the membership ladder next year.
Does anyone have half an idea on anything?

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3236 on: July 29, 2016, 02:09:50 PM »
Nothing short of discontinuing your membership will stop this rot. Next year will mark my third year as a recovering ex Richmond member. Keep parting with your cash and this charade will roll on: year in, year out until eventually Benny exits for greener AFL HQ pastures and Dimma devolves into a minor role with his beloved Bombers - leaving smoking ruins behind.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3237 on: July 29, 2016, 02:10:32 PM »
Why has chol played Zero times in a pruning year? Ditto Callum moore. Butler

Has Lennon been managed to the best possible standards? Menadue? McBean? Elton?

Why the hell was george dropped again

Why won't he put vlastuin in the middle

Should hardwick have shown more leadership. To help yarren and Mckenzie?

All valid questions.  But it's more important to get games into hunt grigg and houli.  Also Peggy wants a strong finish to the season so we can be on top of the membership ladder next year.

You don't have to buy one Harry

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3238 on: July 29, 2016, 02:11:39 PM »
Nothing short of discontinuing your membership will stop this rot. Next year will mark my third year as a recovering ex Richmond member. Keep parting with your cash and this charade will roll on: year in, year out until eventually Benny exits for greener AFL HQ pastures and Dimma devolves into a minor role with his beloved Bombers - leaving smoking ruins behind.

Im going to jump off a cliff I'm that depressed

Offline Harry

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1446
  • Fighting injustice and incompetence
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3239 on: July 29, 2016, 02:27:49 PM »
Why has chol played Zero times in a pruning year? Ditto Callum moore. Butler

Has Lennon been managed to the best possible standards? Menadue? McBean? Elton?

Why the hell was george dropped again

Why won't he put vlastuin in the middle

Should hardwick have shown more leadership. To help yarren and Mckenzie?

All valid questions.  But it's more important to get games into hunt grigg and houli.  Also Peggy wants a strong finish to the season so we can be on top of the membership ladder next year.

You don't have to buy one Harry

Nah being top of the membership ladder is too important to me.
Does anyone have half an idea on anything?