Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Quote from: Dookie on October 21, 2012, 01:27:23 PMStef Martins worst is very very bad - Gus like. Possibly worse. PASS.disagree.i was impressed with his 2011 was very good for a back up ruckman, and 2009 he had a decent yr tracking in the right direction for a young player in his second yr in the afl.he managed just 7 gmes this yr mainly due to injury. 2010 he played just 2 games again due to injury hip problem. so hes stalled more due to injury than not having talent.seems his two recent injury free seasons hes been decent and hes tracked well and truly in the right direction.reckon he would be the type hartley looks at a talented player not getting a game or performing for what ever reason at another club, a player who may come real cheap.at 199cm and 104kg hes plenty big enough to play first ruck in time. i think the knock on him here is does he have the ticker to play as a ruckman.hes a little like derickx in the fact he was drafted as a mature recruit at age 21. unlike derickx he managed 8 games in his first yr 2008. and like i said filled the second ruck role nicely in 2009 his second yr playing 19 games and showing real upside. 2010 2 games injury.2011 21 games and a very decent season 96 marks, 18 possesions a game 10 goals and 16 h/o per game as the back up ruckman. nothing to be sneezed at.2012 was a struggle with ijury managing just 7 games and looking very ordinary at times. another tall ruckman/for called vickery struggled in 2012 with injury and looked terrible.would give him a try for the right price.
Stef Martins worst is very very bad - Gus like. Possibly worse. PASS.
Jacko is a required player. Midfield struggles with depth as it is. I can't see the club even considering trading him. Lets make our midfield weaker. Nice one Bigfooty
Quote from: WilliamPowell on October 21, 2012, 02:36:19 PMQuote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 02:13:45 PMJacko is a required player. Midfield struggles with depth as it is. I can't see the club even considering trading him. Lets make our midfield weaker. Nice one Bigfooty Are you seriously suggesting that if the Saints came knocking at the door and offered pick 13 you'd say "sorry no thanks he's a required player" Please!!!!! If any team offered a pick in the top 20 for a player like Jackson then the RFC would be considered derelict in its duty to to take it IMHO.I'd trade him for free and drive him to Seaford.
Quote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 02:13:45 PMJacko is a required player. Midfield struggles with depth as it is. I can't see the club even considering trading him. Lets make our midfield weaker. Nice one Bigfooty Are you seriously suggesting that if the Saints came knocking at the door and offered pick 13 you'd say "sorry no thanks he's a required player" Please!!!!! If any team offered a pick in the top 20 for a player like Jackson then the RFC would be considered derelict in its duty to to take it IMHO.
Combined rumours from BF:"OK based on the chatter going on this weekend here is what we should be keeping an eye out for this week:1. Post being traded to Brisbane or Saints.2. Jackson being traded to Saints.3. Richmond looking to improve draft picks into the top 35." http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/trades-and-free-agency-talk-pt2.977103/page-65#post-26161284
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH
Quote from: one-eyed on October 21, 2012, 05:42:05 PMCombined rumours from BF:"OK based on the chatter going on this weekend here is what we should be keeping an eye out for this week:1. Post being traded to Brisbane or Saints.2. Jackson being traded to Saints.3. Richmond looking to improve draft picks into the top 35." http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/trades-and-free-agency-talk-pt2.977103/page-65#post-26161284I thought we didn't care about other sites
Quote from: Mrakov on October 21, 2012, 02:37:08 PMQuote from: WilliamPowell on October 21, 2012, 02:36:19 PMQuote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 02:13:45 PMJacko is a required player. Midfield struggles with depth as it is. I can't see the club even considering trading him. Lets make our midfield weaker. Nice one Bigfooty Are you seriously suggesting that if the Saints came knocking at the door and offered pick 13 you'd say "sorry no thanks he's a required player" Please!!!!! If any team offered a pick in the top 20 for a player like Jackson then the RFC would be considered derelict in its duty to to take it IMHO.I'd trade him for free and drive him to Seaford.And I'll pony up for the fuel.
Kosi and Raph Clarke for Jacko is the mail.
Quote from: Mrakov on October 21, 2012, 11:30:37 PMKosi and Raph Clarke for Jacko is the mail.Yeah from the Saints Board at BF wishfully thinking of there behalf I would have thought
Quote from: Tiger-From-Tas on October 21, 2012, 11:49:38 PMQuote from: Mrakov on October 21, 2012, 11:30:37 PMKosi and Raph Clarke for Jacko is the mail.Yeah from the Saints Board at BF wishfully thinking of there behalf I would have thought Imagine they're right
Quote from: MADTIGER2010 on October 21, 2012, 02:13:45 PMJacko is a required player. Midfield struggles with depth as it is. I can't see the club even considering trading him. Lets make our midfield weaker. Nice one Bigfooty
