Trade week targets & rumours [merged]

[one-eyed]

SEN reporting that Adelaide will face a $800,000 fine and Tippett will be de-registered  .

[tigs2011]

The Bulldogs are also looking at someone for 44.

Please let it be Post

They blinked with the Stevens deal.  Traded away 44.  We wouldn't want 44 for post anyway.  We wouldn't use it.

Whether we use it or not is not the point. Post has to go. If someone says he needs more game time or is a late bloomer or he has been played out of position I'm going to flip out!!

Really can't understand this Post hate at all. 22 year old who's still a better option than Astbury

Astbury showed more in his first season. Astbury been around 1 year less and has missed 2 out of 3 seasons. Post has been fit (uninjured) for 4 years.

[tigs2011]

SEN reporting that Adelaide will face a $800,000 fine and Tippett will be de-registered  .

Surely not?

[gerkin greg]

lolz if true 

[MADTIGER2010]

The Bulldogs are also looking at someone for 44.

Please let it be Post

They blinked with the Stevens deal.  Traded away 44.  We wouldn't want 44 for post anyway.  We wouldn't use it.

Whether we use it or not is not the point. Post has to go. If someone says he needs more game time or is a late bloomer or he has been played out of position I'm going to flip out!!

Really can't understand this Post hate at all. 22 year old who's still a better option than Astbury

Astbury showed more in his first season. Astbury been around 1 year less and has missed 2 out of 3 seasons. Post has been fit (uninjured) for 4 years.

Reckon both have shown similar output in their games. Astbury struggles badly in 1 on 1s

[tigs2011]

lolz if true 

  serves the dobbers right. Though I think they've taken a fair hammering already. Angus & Tambling in with Maric & Knights out and not getting compo for Knights lol

[tigs2011]

The Bulldogs are also looking at someone for 44.

Please let it be Post

They blinked with the Stevens deal.  Traded away 44.  We wouldn't want 44 for post anyway.  We wouldn't use it.

Whether we use it or not is not the point. Post has to go. If someone says he needs more game time or is a late bloomer or he has been played out of position I'm going to flip out!!

Really can't understand this Post hate at all. 22 year old who's still a better option than Astbury

Astbury showed more in his first season. Astbury been around 1 year less and has missed 2 out of 3 seasons. Post has been fit (uninjured) for 4 years.

Reckon both have shown similar output in their games. Astbury struggles badly in 1 on 1s

Based on when?

1. he was 18 and a first year player?
2. as a 2nd year player got lumped on Cloke/Roughead?
3. in his 2 games back from a shocking knee injury?

[gerkin greg]

serves the dobbers right.

i think they are prepared to cop a whack so that tippett gets reamed

[Coach]

lolz if true 

  serves the dobbers right. Though I think they've taken a fair hammering already. Angus & Tambling in with Maric & Knights out and not getting compo for Knights lol

Yeah Adelaide are spewing about losing Knights and Maric

[tiga]

The Bulldogs are also looking at someone for 44.

Please let it be Post

They blinked with the Stevens deal.  Traded away 44.  We wouldn't want 44 for post anyway.  We wouldn't use it.

Whether we use it or not is not the point. Post has to go. If someone says he needs more game time or is a late bloomer or he has been played out of position I'm going to flip out!!

Really can't understand this Post hate at all. 22 year old who's still a better option than Astbury

Quite Simple...GNDN (Star Trek Fans will know this acronym  )

[tigs2011]

lolz if true 

  serves the dobbers right. Though I think they've taken a fair hammering already. Angus & Tambling in with Maric & Knights out and not getting compo for Knights lol

Yeah Adelaide are spewing about losing Knights and Maric

Yer they must be stoked to have lost Maric. 
I said Knights for no compo. Doubt they'd care so much about Knights leaving but then receiving zero compensation annoyed them. Seems they've approached the AFL about it I'd say they're stoked about that too.

[Judge Roughneck]

SEN reporting that Adelaide will face a $800,000 fine and Tippett will be de-registered  .

Come punt road kurt

[Coach]

lolz if true 

  serves the dobbers right. Though I think they've taken a fair hammering already. Angus & Tambling in with Maric & Knights out and not getting compo for Knights lol

Yeah Adelaide are spewing about losing Knights and Maric

Yer they must be stoked to have lost Maric. 
I said Knights for no compo. Doubt they'd care so much about Knights leaving but then receiving zero compensation annoyed them. Seems they've approached the AFL about it I'd say they're stoked about that too.

Why would they care about a bloke they don't rate? Maric was playing twos and their ruckman is better than him anyway. Getting a 2nd rounder for him was a decent deal for them. Knights is a reserves player at a top side so if they GAF about him then why did they stick him in the reserves all year and let him walk? Even Clinton Young has more runs on the board and the Hawks only got pick 66. What would Adelaide expect for Knights? the #1 pick? They traded away picks to us because they werent going to use them.

[Phil Mrakov]

Adelaide supporter just posted on the Geelong board that West/Manager met with Collingwood today.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/trades-and-free-agency-talk-pt2.977103/page-95

Collingwoodz again with their Magical cap

[tony_montana]

lolz if true 

  serves the dobbers right. Though I think they've taken a fair hammering already. Angus & Tambling in with Maric & Knights out and not getting compo for Knights lol

Yeah Adelaide are spewing about losing Knights and Maric

Yer they must be stoked to have lost Maric. 
I said Knights for no compo. Doubt they'd care so much about Knights leaving but then receiving zero compensation annoyed them. Seems they've approached the AFL about it I'd say they're stoked about that too.

Why would they care about a bloke they don't rate? Maric was playing twos and their ruckman is better than him anyway. Getting a 2nd rounder for him was a decent deal for them. Knights is a reserves player at a top side so if they GAF about him then why did they stick him in the reserves all year and let him walk? Even Clinton Young has more runs on the board and the Hawks only got pick 66. What would Adelaide expect for Knights? the #1 pick? They traded away picks to us because they werent going to use them.

pfft Maric is better than one trick pony Jacobs