I thought mitch showd good signs at the end of '10 playing in the midfield.
But after saying that the forward role he played was redundant, hardwick started him off in that role in '11, and that was the beginning of the end.
Makes you wonder if that was the plan all along?
In saying that he has only been servicable in the games he has played so far, but it shows that a fringe player from a struggling club can play a role for a club aspiring for the big prize. There is no way he was recruited as a "best 22" by sydney
