Author Topic: Josh Toy  (Read 16165 times)

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40386
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #30 on: November 12, 2012, 06:29:03 PM »
Surely they wouldn't re rookie mini Maric?

Surely it seems they would

Staggering  :gobdrop :gobdrop
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #31 on: November 12, 2012, 06:37:51 PM »
He's been invited to train with us too.

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6301/newsid/150993/default.aspx
It seems we've already narrowed down the field for our two rookie selections - one of Toy or mini Maric :P and one of Stephenson or Wood  :P.
This is just poor list management.
if we had delisted mcguane and white, not only would we be able to take all 4, we would have been able to put two on the list proper and tie them up for 2 years.

just no good enough richmond, not good enough :nope
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Crumden

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #32 on: November 12, 2012, 06:50:56 PM »
From someone who knows Josh, his heart "problems" are over-exaggerated in the media.

He's done medicals with 5 clubs that I know of (Rich, Haw, North Melb, WB, Ess).

So it would seem clubs are doing their due dilligence.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/rumour-josh-toy-to-richmond.980373/page-3#post-26377211
last bloke we picked with a dodgy ticker (physically, not metaphorically) was Francis Bourke.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #33 on: November 12, 2012, 06:59:04 PM »
Surely they wouldn't re rookie mini Maric?

Surely it seems they would

Staggering  :gobdrop :gobdrop

Better than Jackson :p
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #34 on: November 12, 2012, 07:02:08 PM »
Surely they wouldn't re rookie mini Maric?

Why not? This is the same mob that gave Hislop the Dutch Rudder.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #35 on: November 12, 2012, 07:13:18 PM »
No to: Maric and Stephenson, although it could just be an offer to later move across to Coburg. Yes to: Toy, Wood and Petterd......in that order.

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5341
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #36 on: November 12, 2012, 07:21:32 PM »
Draft Joshua Toy!

It is strange that he hasn't been snapped up?

In the 2010 Draft, David Swallow said that if he was in the draft, he would of gone No.1.

Have a friend that worked with Josh's brother and Josh's brother did say Gold Coast said we will pick you up through the draft and you get paid $55,000 or sign for two years for $150,000.

Didn't like playing in the Gold Coast and didn't get along with Bluey, same as Caddy really!

His heart problem? May be serious, because why wouldn't he be picked up by now???

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #37 on: November 12, 2012, 07:35:53 PM »
Im warming to toy, yes he has heart problem but with rotations and sub rule he could quite a canny selection :clapping
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #38 on: November 12, 2012, 08:30:55 PM »
 :pray

Draft Joshua Toy!

It is strange that he hasn't been snapped up?

In the 2010 Draft, David Swallow said that if he was in the draft, he would of gone No.1.

Have a friend that worked with Josh's brother and Josh's brother did say Gold Coast said we will pick you up through the draft and you get paid $55,000 or sign for two years for $150,000.

Didn't like playing in the Gold Coast and didn't get along with Bluey, same as Caddy really!

His heart problem? May be serious, because why wouldn't he be picked up by now???

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #39 on: November 12, 2012, 08:33:52 PM »
Has he got the ticker to play AFL? That is the question. :-\
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #40 on: November 13, 2012, 01:50:48 AM »
Surely they wouldn't re rookie mini Maric?

Why not? This is the same mob that gave Hislop the Dutch Rudder.

You questioning Helmut??

Offline Rodgerramjet

  • OER - CONTRIBUTOR
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
  • Never cast pearls before swine.
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #41 on: November 13, 2012, 02:32:07 AM »
Josh Toy you would think would be a no brainer really, defender too
The lips of Wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #42 on: November 13, 2012, 11:17:02 AM »
Surely they wouldn't re rookie mini Maric?

Why not? This is the same mob that gave Hislop the Dutch Rudder.

Dutch rudder, dutch oven, its just a game of inches gerks  ;D

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #43 on: November 13, 2012, 01:59:07 PM »
Would anyone consider Toy long term and valuable enough to use our 4th pick? May not last through PSD and rookie selections?

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Josh Toy
« Reply #44 on: November 13, 2012, 02:05:04 PM »
I wouldn't be upset using 2nd pick.