Essendon face AFL probe/Players found Guilty by CAS

[Chuck17]

who'd i insult?

Hmmm it looks like you had a go at slow witted and illiterate people..... The Collingwood cheer squad?

[Yeahright]

who'd i insult?

Look at the underlined comments plus this "says a lot , really". Don't deny they were cheap shots, pathetic really

[Penelope]

"This says a lot"
when someone thinks that illegal activity is ok because they dont like the recipients. yep i stand by that. it does say a lot.

so whats the difference between that and calling someone pathetic?

as for the underlined, who in particular do you think i was insulting?

[Yeahright]

"This says a lot"
when someone thinks that illegal activity is ok because they dont like the recipients. yep i stand by that. it does say a lot.

so whats the difference between that and calling someone pathetic?

as for the underlined, who in particular do you think i was insulting?

He admitted it was because they did something illegal not because of who it was.
 I said your cheap shots were pathetic, not you as a person.
 Daniel

[Francois Jackson]

"This says a lot"
when someone thinks that illegal activity is ok because they dont like the recipients. yep i stand by that. it does say a lot.

so whats the difference between that and calling someone pathetic?

as for the underlined, who in particular do you think i was insulting?

He admitted it was because they did something illegal not because of who it was.
 I said your cheap shots were pathetic, not you as a person.
 Daniel

Ignore him mate.  Tiges won, thats all that matters, he will probably complain about that too.

[Penelope]

"This says a lot"
when someone thinks that illegal activity is ok because they dont like the recipients. yep i stand by that. it does say a lot.

so whats the difference between that and calling someone pathetic?

as for the underlined, who in particular do you think i was insulting?

He admitted it was because they did something illegal not because of who it was.
 I said your cheap shots were pathetic, not you as a person.
 Daniel

no, he made it quite clear he doesnt care how the info was gained, just that it shafts essendon.

I care little where the information comes from if its proven criminal activity has taken place.

In fact if phones were tapped and EFC are found guilty then IMO they should be applauded for their efforts in destroying the EFC

im guilty of cheap shots, but not in this case. it is what it is.

[Penelope]

"This says a lot"
when someone thinks that illegal activity is ok because they dont like the recipients. yep i stand by that. it does say a lot.

so whats the difference between that and calling someone pathetic?

as for the underlined, who in particular do you think i was insulting?

He admitted it was because they did something illegal not because of who it was.
 I said your cheap shots were pathetic, not you as a person.
 Daniel

Ignore him mate.  Tiges won, thats all that matters, he will probably complain about that too.

based on what? care to explain? give examples of precedence perhaps?

[Yeahright]

no, he made it quite clear he doesnt care how the info was gained, just that it shafts essendon.

so back to my original statement you do think the end justifies the means.

says a lot , really

Yes only if criminal activity is found to be present.

[Penelope]

yep, when someone thinks that illegal activity is ok because it exposes illegal activity, that says a lot.

[Yeahright]

yep, when someone thinks that illegal activity is ok because it exposes illegal activity, that says a lot.

I thought he thought it was okay cause it was Essendon 

[1965]

Hird, then players, to face ASADA

Essendon coach James Hird will be followed by the Bombers' leadership group in being interviewed by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority.

Hird will be interviewed by ASADA on Tuesday. The interviews could be lengthy and held over multiple meetings.

Essendon has been informed that its leadership group will be the first of the players to be interviewed. The players are entitled to have their own lawyer and others, such as their agent or a parent, present.
 
The AFL Players Association's lawyer Brett Murphy will also attend all interviews.

According to observers with knowledge of ASADA's investigations, its meeting with James Hird is but one chapter in what looms as a 20-chapter book.

''Whether the interview goes for two hours or six hours, at the end of it, the media and everyone else will be none the wiser because it's just the first interview,'' the observer said.

''It won't have anyone coming in declaring they have done something wrong.

''It won't have ASADA accusing somebody that they have done something wrong.''

Former ASADA head Richard Ings warned on Monday that the Hird interview was only one of 100 likely to be held and that the process would go for months. All interviews need to be collated and cross-referenced.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/hird-then-players-to-face-asada-20130415-2hw5z.html#ixzz2QZGglLrA

[Tigeritis™©®]

How do I get a job at ASADA?

Sounds like a pretty cushy job.

Excellent job security too, investigations never seem to end.

[Smokey]

How do I get a job at ASADA?

Sounds like a pretty cushy job.

Excellent job security too, investigations never seem to end.

And the side benefits too.  Taking home the unused drug samples after they are finished with them! 

[tigs2011]

How do I get a job at ASADA?

Sounds like a pretty cushy job.

Excellent job security too, investigations never seem to end.

And the side benefits too.  Taking home the unused drug samples after they are finished with them! 

[one-eyed]

ESSENDON players are expecting to be interviewed by ASADA investigators in about a fortnight.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-04-18/players-next-on-asada-list