Author Topic: Essendon face AFL probe/Players found Guilty by CAS  (Read 661834 times)

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3420 on: March 26, 2015, 12:45:13 AM »
You mean the shed outback of Danks house?

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3421 on: March 27, 2015, 04:01:09 AM »
The footy show made a big deal about Barrett having a Dank exclusive but all it was was a quote from Dank saying Joe Daniher was given protein powder and tablets but no injections in 2012 (this was before he was officially drafted in November 2012 as a father-son).

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3422 on: March 27, 2015, 01:22:13 PM »
THE AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal will convene at Etihad Stadium next Tuesday at 2pm to decide the fate of 34 past and present Essendon players.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-03-27/time-for-dons-verdict

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3423 on: March 27, 2015, 04:36:37 PM »
So, what are our resident specialists predicting ?

Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3424 on: March 27, 2015, 04:43:20 PM »
Hird to blame everyone except himself.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3425 on: March 27, 2015, 04:52:01 PM »
That's already played out.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3426 on: March 27, 2015, 09:15:33 PM »
6 month bans. No backdating.
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3427 on: March 27, 2015, 10:12:46 PM »
Without priority pics for finishing last
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
How Stephen Dank ran the controversial Essendon supplement program (H-Sun)
« Reply #3428 on: March 28, 2015, 04:53:54 AM »
Essendon drugs saga: How Stephen Dank ran the controversial supplement program

Carly Crawford
Herald-Sun
March 28, 2015



THE fridge in Stephen Dank’s office at Windy Hill wasn’t stocked with typical supplies.

Bottled water and sandwiches? No.

This was Essendon FC in 2012.

Peptides were on the menu.

The man they call “Danksy” stored hexarelin and other potions in this fridge, which he left unlocked in his disorderly office deep inside Bombers’ HQ.

The office doubled as a makeshift medical centre — it was here that Dank allegedly injected supplements into Essendon players and staff, including the club’s AFL legend coach James Hird.

Dank was not a qualified doctor. He wasn’t a pharmacist. He wasn’t even an accredited sports scientist, although he’d had years of experience working at professional sporting clubs.

Yet he was the man Essendon’s leaders had recruited to give their players, young men, the scientific edge they hoped might win them the flag.

As Essendon’s official sports scientist, Dank was a key part of their fitness team alongside high performance coach Dean “the Weapon” Robinson.

The pair had worked together previously, at The Gold Coast Suns, before moving south. Robinson, brought to the Bombers by Mark Thompson, had recommended his close, trusted friend Dank for the role.

So together, Dank and Robinson oversaw a regimen of jabs, pills, creams and intravenous drips that plunged the club — and the AFL — into the biggest doping crisis in the history of Australian sport.

Exactly who within the Bombers knew what about the controversial supplement program will be disputed for years to come.

And whether the club’s rampant, poorly regulated injection schedule amounted to doping will be decided in three days, when the AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal hands down its verdict.

No matter the tribunal outcome, one thing is clear: the program was way out of line and possibly even harmful to players.


IT ALL started around September 2011, when Dank and Robinson met James Hird at his Toorak mansion for a chat about how they could “turn the club around” using cutting edge sports science.

Robinson’s recollection of that meeting — which Hird strongly disputes — was that Hird had declared he and Dank were now in the club’s “inner sanctum” and the coach wanted the pair to transform the players.

“He wanted me to bring bigger and stronger players to him,” Robinson told the Seven Network.

Robinson, the square-jawed fitness expert who had advised a long list of AFL and NRL teams, then made the unbelievable claim that Hird had suggested he and Dank should run a “black ops” supplement program.

Regardless of whether that is true (and there is a good chance it’s not given Hird’s denials) the evidence suggests Dank and Robinson enthusiastically embraced the idea of a secret supplement regimen.

The pair discussed concealing the specific peptides they were giving players and even made those players sign confidentiality forms.

In October 2011, Robinson texted Dank about a substance that is explicitly banned for use by athletes, a bodybuilding peptide called CJC-1295.

“Can we just call them amino acids? Or something of the kind?” Robinson wrote.

Dank replied: “Yes, that is all they are, an amino acid blend … Leave peptides out.”

Some players, and even Hird himself, recall being told they were receiving simple “amino acids”. Full stop.

Even club doctor Bruce “Doc” Reid was made to accept that scant description in the early weeks of this new supplement regimen.

The veteran medic, a much-loved fixture of the club, was considered yesterday’s man by those pushing this new science.

He wasn’t consulted when players’ blood samples were allegedly sent interstate to check for the WADA-banned substance Insulin Growth Factor 1 in November 2011.

Just why a secret test for a banned substance would even be carried out raised a big red flag for anti-doping investigators and presumably would have done the same had Reid been aware.

But that wasn’t all. The next month, Dank was placing orders for a long list of peptides.



Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3429 on: March 28, 2015, 05:03:21 AM »
BY JANUARY 2012, Reid was very worried.

A club veteran, he had never seen anything like it and he was in the dark on too many important details.

When he heard players had been injected — without his knowledge — with a relatively unknown anti-obesity drug called AOD-9604, he hit the roof.

As far as he knew, the players had been getting vitamins and amino acids only.

“If we are resorting to deliver this altered growth hormone molecule, I think we are playing at the edge and this will read extremely badly in the press for our club … I have trouble with these drugs,” he wrote in letter to Hird and Essendon’s then football manager Paul Hamilton on January 17.

He went on to slam as “ludicrous” the use of calf’s blood as a recovery agent, saying it was based on “flimsy evidence”.

“I am sure Steve Dank believes that what we are doing is totally ethical and legal, however, one wonders whether if you take a long stance and look at this from a distance, whether you would want your children being injected with a derivative hormone that is not free to the community.”

But Doc Reid wasn’t the only Essendon health professional suspicious of the program.

When Robinson presented Hird with a copy of an academic paper co-authored by Dank about a supplement called Lactaway, the club dietitian took issue with it almost instantly.

Benita Lalor doubted whether the substance was effective and cautioned that it might even cause muscle damage.

An obviously frustrated Hird emailed a colleague: “This is what we are dealing with.”

For all his zeal, Hird did show restraint, issuing an email saying the program should not harm players and should comply with anti-doping rules.

But, according to Ziggy Switkowski’s review of the program, there was no real follow-up or monitoring to check these ground rules were ever followed.

Along the way, there were plenty of signs things were heading down a potentially dangerous path.

Hird suffered side effects after injecting himself with the Melan otan II allegedly given to him by Robinson. That was early in the piece — as far back as October 2011.

Hird had allegedly received vitamin injections and tablets — likely ephe drine and pro panol — himself.

Even Reid, the author of that explosive letter, was present when players later received the very treatments he had criticised.


IN FEBRUARY 2012, 38 players signed consent forms explaining to them what substances they would receive and instructing them to keep it all on the low-down.

According to the season-long supplement schedule, they were to receive an extraordinary 1500 j abs of AOD- 9604 and a substance described on the forms only as “thymo sin”.

On top of that, they would get 16,500 doses of colo-strum and 8000 doses of tri-bulus.

But the drug-fest didn’t end there. At least one player was given TA65, an anti-ageing tablet obtained from a clinician in South Yarra.

By March, players were being injected offsite — over the road, across town and eventually interstate.

Across the road from Windy Hill was a clinic called Skinovate, then run by a cosmetic doctor named Paul Spano.

There, drips — which had not been approved by Reid — were loaded with vitamin C and B were jammed into the veins of the players.

In all, Skinovate allegedly billed 155 IV treatments to the Bombers.

None of this amounted to doping, of course, and Dank and Hird spoke about it freely by text.

“All IV and injections completed,” wrote Dank.

Hird replied: “Great work mate, it would be a great effort to have them feeling fresh for Anzac Day.”

During a team trip to Queensland, a few players were taken to a clinic in the Gold Coast hinterland and given vitamin B and Acto-vegin. Reid was there.

In April, players and staff visited a chiropractor named Mal Hooper at his clinic, Hypermed, in South Yarra. There, they received 112 “amino acids” injections and 32 jabs of cere-brolysin, an anti-Alzheimers drug.

They also allegedly got injected with the mystery amino acid borrowed from a muscular dystrophy patient who got it in some pharmacy in Mexico.

All these off-site injections had the bespectacled Reid very concerned. By May, Dank had been told to stop.

But for three more months, until early August, the jabs continued.

By now, there was evidence Dank was trying new types of supplements.


WHEN a wave of soft tissue injuries struck the club, Hird asked his sports scientist for clues.

In April, he texted Dank: “Why do you reckon we are getting all the injuries?”

Dank said: “I need to use much more placental cells and Acto-vegin ... West Coast, Hawthorn and Collingwood’s tissues are biologically advanced. We need to change our biology for a little while.”

A text exchange shows that around this time, Dank had turned to a Melbourne pharmacist for help with the team’s soft tissue injuries.

The pharmacist suggests trying a new mixture, to which Dank replies: “Perfect, let’s get going. Have we tried it on anyone yet?”

Pharmacist: “Few dental injections for periodontal sockets but not for sporting.”

Dank: “Let us test a couple of players.”

It seemed Dank saw the whole thing as one big experiment in which these young players were used as guinea pigs.

When Dank moved to AFL from NRL, he told a former colleague he’d intended to “revolutionise” Australian Football.

He’d talk about which NRL players he thought he could turn into AFL stars, or in his words “prototypes”.

Dank had co-authored a number of academic papers. An academic colleague remembers his eccentric manner, his bad suits and his thirst for scientific knowledge.

“His academic credentials were a bit vague but what he does demonstrate is a real intellect and capacity for knowledge in different areas,” the colleague told the Herald Sun.

There is no suggestion any of this was malicious. In fact one source likened Dank’s activities to the man who created the nuclear bomb — he was so consumed by the science he perhaps failed to stop and think about the ethics.

ALL UP, ASADA identified 75 different substances as relevant to their Operation Cobia probe into possible doping in the NRL and AFL.

Most of the substances known to have been used at Essendon were not banned under anti-doping rules.

But there were others — like the mysterious Mexican concoction and the abbreviated “thy-mosin” on the consent forms — that still have everyone guessing.

Then there is the gear, like hexarelin, that doping investigators suspect may have been used on players, but cannot prove.

If Essendon is next week found to have committed doping violations, it will be because ASADA was able to persuade the tribunal the “thy-mosin” on the consent form was a reference to Thy-mosin beta 4 — a WADA-banned type of the drug commonly used on horses.

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-drugs-saga-how-stephen-dank-ran-the-controversial-supplement-program/story-fndv8gad-1227281669383

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3430 on: March 28, 2015, 05:09:54 AM »
Lack of knowledge won't save Dons players from potential bans: Gill McLachlan

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-03-27/i-feel-for-the-players-

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3431 on: March 29, 2015, 12:09:58 AM »
Essendon doping verdict: Countdown is on to Bombers’ D-day

Grant Baker
Herald-Sun
March 29, 2015


IT’S been 779 days since the so-called “blackest day in Australian sport” sent the AFL and Essendon into chaos. In two days, it could all be over. Here are the possible results, and what it will mean for all parties.



THE PLAYERS

GUILTY

THE players can appeal the verdict on Tuesday straight after the hammer falls — or they can wait for sanctions to be decided before making a call on whether to fight.

They may not play while an appeal is pending. The players will face an anxious wait of days — possibly weeks — while sanctions hearings are held and final penalties decided.

For some, there may be a decision to appeal on principle.

For others — perhaps the players now at other clubs — brutal practicality may come into play. For them, a penalty which sees them sit out only a matter of a few matches might be acceptable — even if just to move on.

Although it is almost universally accepted in football that none of the players set out to cheat, a doping violation will unavoidably cast a stain on the players’ records and reputations.

If players miss out on match payments, future contracts, loss of marketing opportunities or face other complications related to the supplements program, they can sue the club and possibly even the AFL for damages and breach of duty of care, a scenario that some player managers say is already being considered.

NOT GUILTY

First comes the sigh of relief, then a game against grand finalist Sydney on Saturday afternoon.

The anxiety, though, will remain for up to 21 days while ASADA (and possibly even WADA) weigh up an appeal.



JAMES HIRD

GUILTY

Hird’s position must again be in real jeopardy.

Even many of his most ardent supporters have expressed the view that Hird can not continue to coach while the players sat out, suspended.

However, Hird has proved a stayer and it’s now thought his level of danger is proportional to the length of any suspensions.

He may survive a couple of weeks, but it is difficult to see him being retained if the season is totally wrecked by bans.

For some, a guilty verdict will further tarnish Hird’s reputation. But for a core group of supporters — who believe he has been wronged by the system and made scapegoat — Hird’s martyrdom will be cemented.

NOT GUILTY

Hird’s job will be assured.

And the question then becomes one of how he will react.

In word and deed, Hird has made it clear he believes the players, the club and he have been dealt with unfairly by ASADA, the AFL or both.

With that in mind, a strong desire to let loose the anger and emotion that has built up over more than two years is understandable. Or he may summon the will to park that anger, look ahead instead of behind and repair a very damaged but very necessary relationship with the AFL.



ESSENDON

GUILTY

Most immediately, there will be harm to the club’s on- field prospects in the short term as sanctions are decided and possibly served.

There will be questions to answer about whether board members and key executives in place at the time of the supplements regimen must resign.

The club will face off-field damage to its brand, which may result in lost revenue from sponsors and members.

A guilty verdict will leave Essendon exposed to possible damages claims from players, or big payouts if the club wants to avoid the courts.

A WorkSafe Victoria investigation into Essendon remains live, and would likely come into stark focus.

Importantly, the AFL has committed to not punishing the club a second time — after dishing out the toughest penalties in footy history for governance breaches back in 2013.

NOT GUILTY

There has been some speculation that Essendon may seek to have its AFL governance punishments — a $2 million fine and draft picks withheld — reversed if no doping offence is found to have been committed, but this seems highly unlikely.

As with Hird, there is a question about how the club publicly handles the result — and there is no doubt some at AFL House are concerned about how Essendon chairman Paul Little will respond.

He, remember, once said he had lost confidence in the AFL executive.



THE AFL

GUILTY

A finding of systematic, team-wide doping at an AFL club will mean a national and international black mark against the AFL’s reputation, regardless of any mitigating circumstances.

It will be an unprecedented situation in professional team sport.

The league must face up to a third consecutive season being horribly damaged — and it must quickly find a way to address the unfairness a big number of suspensions to Essendon players will cause to the fixture. On the near horizon is the prospect of the centenary of Anzac match — otherwise a huge marketing and financial boon — ruined.

The league has made no secret the doping scandal has damaged its brand, and a guilty finding would be another blow to its esteem.

In some ways, there will be a sense of vindication over the AFL’s treatment of Essendon before the 2013 finals.

Like Essendon, the AFL is facing a WorkSafe investigation and some player managers have flagged their desire to sue the league, as the ultimate employer of the players.

NOT GUILTY

The AFL will work with ASADA and WADA on reforming its anti-doping code, so that never again are three seasons so badly affected by a drugs scandal.

The league’s satisfaction at being able to stage a season not hampered by doping bans will be tempered by concern about what Little and Hird and even some of the players say and do.



ASADA

GUILTY

The anti-doping watchdog can claim total vindication of its processes and handling of what has been an unprecedented investigation after achieving result in both NRL and AFL cases.

It may also stave off a federal senate or judicial inquiry, something that appeared to be on the cards during Hird’s Federal Court challenge.

ASADA, which has operated on a shoestring budget of about $14 million a year, will also have strong grounds to seek more government money — armed with the argument the fight against doping now requires expensive investigation, not cheap drug testing.

NOT GUILTY

ASADA must weigh up its chances of success on appeal, likely in consultation with WADA.

It will face scrutiny and possible backlash in Canberra, where questions will be asked about the political and financial cost of a two-year investigation that has failed to land a prosecution — other than the backroom deals done in the NRL case.



JOBE WATSON’S BROWNLOW MEDAL

GUILTY

Watson’s grip on the medal he won in the year of the supplements regimen must come under threat — notwithstanding that no one in the football industry believes he knowingly set out to take banned substances. It is ultimately a decision for the AFL Commission.

The league has previously hinted it will be unlikely to strip Watson of the medal unless a case of wilful doping is proved. But those hints came at a time when the prospect of ASADA action against players seemed remote.

NOT GUILTY

The medal will remain his.



STEPHEN DANK

GUILTY

Don’t discount the possibility that Dank can be found guilty and harshly punished over charges that have nothing to do with allegations the players were administered Thymosin Beta-4. So a scenario in which Dank is punished, and the players not, is possible.

NOT GUILTY

Dank has not attended the tribunal or fought any of the charges. He has denied any wrongdoing but said the AFL tribunal is not the appropriate forum to put his case.

A not-guilty verdict in those circumstances is unlikely but possible.

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-doping-verdict-countdown-is-on-to-bombers-d-day/story-fndv8gad-1227282451836

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Essendon face AFL probe
« Reply #3432 on: March 29, 2015, 02:19:42 AM »
A FORMER Essendon player seeking to sue the AFL has had an application to protect his identity rejected.

Lawyers for Hal Hunter, who did not appear in court on Wednesday, sought a suppression order on the basis that legal action would relate to medical treatment he received as well as his personal health records.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-03-25/hunter-sues-afl-dons

The former Essendon player taking legal action against the Bombers over health and safety concerns has ordered any documents involving two of the prominent drugs used during the club's "scientifically pioneering program" to be handed over.

Hal Hunter, who was rookie-listed by the Bombers from December 2011 until September 2013, has taken action in the Supreme Court, and has also listed the AFL as a defendant.

Hunter has particularly focused on the role played by Stephen Dank, the architect of the injection program from late 2011 and through 2012.

Hunter's lawyer Jim Constantinou, partner of Melbourne-based firm Schetzer Constantinou, wants "any documents between the Essendon Football Club and Mr Stephen Dank or any entity related to Mr Stephen Dank concerning the administering of AOD-9604 to employees of the Essendon Football Club" and "any documents between the Essendon Football Club and Mr Stephen Dank or any entity related to Mr Stephen Dank concerning the administering of thymosin beta-4 [also known as TB4] to employees of the Essendon Football Club."

Lawyers also want a copy of James Hird's interview with the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority and the AFL on April 16, 2013.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/former-bomber-takes-aim-at-scientifically-pioneering-program-20150328-1m9vo1.html

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Thymosin beta 4 not on WADA banned list: Stephen Dank (Age)
« Reply #3433 on: March 29, 2015, 09:00:40 PM »
Thymosin beta 4 not on WADA banned list: Stephen Dank

Jon Pierik
   The Age
   March 29, 2015 - 5.09pm



As calls come for a "root and branch" review of how the national anti-doping body completes its investigations, the man at the centre of the Essendon saga insists his supplements program was known at the highest levels of the club.

Ahead of Tuesday's verdict by the AFL anti-doping tribunal, Stephen Dank, the architect of the Bombers' 2012 supplements program, maintains the players were given nothing wrong and said the banned drug thymosin beta 4 (TB4) was not on the World Anti-Doping Agency's list of banned drugs.

Thirty-four past and present players are set to find out on Tuesday whether they are guilty of being administered the synthetic peptide.

"There was no substance labelled unfit for human use so anyone that tries to bandy that comment around apart from the fact the comment is totally false, we are now starting to accrue our legal case against people that have suggested as such. Under no circumstances was anything ever injected or given to a player which was unfit for human consumption," Dank told ABC News Radio on Sunday.

Dank gave sworn evidence to the ACC that he administered thymomodulin, an immunity booster safely given to infants, and not TB4.

He said TB4 "modulates the immune system" and "the reality is it has never appeared on a WADA bannedlist".

"The nonsense that is actually brought out in terms of its relationship to other items on 'schedule 2' is a complete nonsense because in terms of chemical structure, of biological activity, cellular biochemistry or pharmocology, it is in no way related to any substance ... to anything that appears on the WADA-banned list.

"In saying that, I am not putting a defence forward because we used it but with all due respect ... I have found it quite laughable that they have tried to establish it in a relationship that is on schedule 2. That in itself I find ridiculous."

It is not listed by name, but TB4 is a peptide that falls under WADA's S2 category for performance enhancing drugs.

In the interview with the ABC, Dank said "nothing had ever been established in terms of its [TB4] performance-enhancing activity".

He said it was "ridiculous" to suggest the protocols used for giving thymomodulin were the same as TB4.

Essendon believes its players were given thymomodulin, also a form of thymosin.

Dank said he had chosen not to release detailed information of what was given "but that will become a lot clearer over the next couple of weeks".

"To say that we have not offered the information is not correct," he said.

"We certainly weren't prepared to offer it either to ASADA or the AFL because to be really blunt, for the bastardisation of this process. We want to leave this to a forum which is fit and proper and certainly ... we would not waste our time in the 'kangaroo court'."

Dank, who initially was interviewed by the Australian Crime Commission, was handed an infraction notice by ASADA, but has refused to be interviewed by the anti-doping body.

Dank said he was considering legal action against the Bombers' 2013 internal report conducted by former Telstra boss, Ziggy Switkowski.

"It is really laughable to suggest we conducted anything in a pharmacologically experimental manner. It was well known what was used at Essendon Football Club so the furphy that has been portrayed by the AFL, ASADA and the Essendon Football Club, that they don't know, is completely wrong," he said.

"There were very tightly governed records in relation to what was administered to those players. They are aware of what was administered to those players. The absolute balderdash that has been served out there that no one knew is completely false.

"Just that it is completely false that these particular substances and the program wasn't discussed through the highest levels of the club. We have been very firm in terms of our belief in what ASADA, the AFL and Essendon know and for them to remotely suggest that no one knew, to be really blunt, is completely wrong and in some ways offending the process we set up at Essendon Football Club. We were very strict in the protocols we set up."

Former ASADA chief Richard Ings said the whole ordeal had highlighted ASADA's lack of experience in dealing with a "fairly complex, professional sport matter".

He told ABC News Radio there were "learnings" in terms of the ASADA legislation and said it was "just crazy" there were up to five levels of tribunal hearings available to the parties.

"I have long held the view that what is needed is a complete root-and-branch review of Australia's anti-doping framework," he said.

"This is a review of ASADA and its processes, this is a huge review of the ASADA Act and the processes under which ASADA must operate by law."

"While it's been a protracted ordeal, Ings said Essendon "certainly put itself in a position through 2011 and 2012 to invite this level of scrutiny".

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/thymosin-beta-4-not-on-wada-banned-list-stephen-dank-20150329-1ma7do.html

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40309
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Thymosin beta 4 not on WADA banned list: Stephen Dank (Age)
« Reply #3434 on: March 29, 2015, 09:11:58 PM »

"In saying that, I am not putting a defence forward because we used it but with all due respect ..
. I have found it quite laughable that they have tried to establish it in a relationship that is on schedule 2. That in itself I find ridiculous."

It is not listed by name, but TB4 is a peptide that falls under WADA's S2 category for performance enhancing drugs.

So let me gets this straight is now saying he did indeed give Essendon players TB4?

If yes, then how much more proof does there need to be?

"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)