Author Topic: Rich v All stars  (Read 12851 times)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #210 on: February 10, 2013, 08:05:20 AM »
How did "the lockup" go? Surely he kicked 10 goals as he's going to be our savior up forward? :whistle
he showed more than your false messiah  :shh
Sorry Al. Remind me who my false Messiah is?
knights
Oh. Nah you've got it completly wrong my friend.
I never said knights was going to be the answer to all our problems up forward.
I just thought it was a great idea to pick him up because he's was a mid forward of decent size that would add much needed depth to our list. He wasn't getting much of an opportunity at the crows so I thought he would be cheap. That's all. 
...But If he dominates then yes I will be expecting all your kudos.  ;D
maybe, but you have talked him up much more than anyone has edwards
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #211 on: February 10, 2013, 09:47:39 AM »
Its clear my heinous and scandalous attacks of last night  :lol have cut some of you to the bone ... all I can suggest is that you blokes look at the calendar and chill out a little bit. In the end, its just a game and people in here last night were taking the mickey. Some of you are far to serious and take this forum too seriously. That is all.

 ;D

Right back at ya bruz  :cheers

Ummmm I was taking the pee ...   :lol

Er what did you think I was doing numbnuts?
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3811
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #212 on: February 10, 2013, 09:54:21 AM »
Not fussed about the result. Just hope we had a good work out. Early days not going to read too much into this game. For me it is far more important what the club is doing off the field in the Alice Springs area-the club is making a positive contribution to the community there. Good on the players and club for the work they are doing there.

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #213 on: February 10, 2013, 10:12:56 AM »
Its clear my heinous and scandalous attacks of last night  :lol have cut some of you to the bone ... all I can suggest is that you blokes look at the calendar and chill out a little bit. In the end, its just a game and people in here last night were taking the mickey. Some of you are far to serious and take this forum too seriously. That is all.

 ;D

Right back at ya bruz  :cheers

Ummmm I was taking the pee ...   :lol

Er what did you think I was doing numbnuts?

unfortunately your posts over a period of time dont reflect that, you were being serious in the thread and its only February lol.

Offline Crazy_Ivan

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #214 on: February 10, 2013, 11:46:31 AM »
Was a bit disappointed not to see Gideon.
The word out of the Club is he is having some problem with his visa.
Isn,t that him in the red singlet on the left?


Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #215 on: February 10, 2013, 12:28:41 PM »
That's Gibbo Turner

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #216 on: February 10, 2013, 03:48:24 PM »
That's Gibbo Turner
Wasn't he delisted as a rookie?
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #217 on: February 10, 2013, 04:49:29 PM »
That's Gibbo Turner

should have been given more of a chance young gibson. has heaps of talent imho.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #218 on: February 10, 2013, 05:00:47 PM »
That's Gibbo Turner
Wasn't he delisted as a rookie?

Correct but pretty sure he's from the NT so could have just been catching up/helping out.
That's Gibbo Turner

should have been given more of a chance young gibson. has heaps of talent imho.

Agreed. Was stoked when we gave him a chance on the rookie list. Unfortunately that was the only chance he got.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98259
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #219 on: February 10, 2013, 06:04:06 PM »
Was a bit disappointed not to see Gideon.
The word out of the Club is he is having some problem with his visa.
Isn,t that him in the red singlet on the left?
As tigs2011 said, that's Gibson Turner.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #220 on: February 10, 2013, 06:26:37 PM »
That's Gibbo Turner

should have been given more of a chance young gibson. has heaps of talent imho.

Agree Ramps
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #221 on: February 10, 2013, 09:08:15 PM »
How did "the lockup" go? Surely he kicked 10 goals as he's going to be our savior up forward? :whistle
he showed more than your false messiah  :shh
Sorry Al. Remind me who my false Messiah is?
knights
Oh. Nah you've got it completly wrong my friend.
I never said knights was going to be the answer to all our problems up forward.
I just thought it was a great idea to pick him up because he's was a mid forward of decent size that would add much needed depth to our list. He wasn't getting much of an opportunity at the crows so I thought he would be cheap. That's all. 
...But If he dominates then yes I will be expecting all your kudos.  ;D

Mmmmm that description sounds like A. Edwards to me except replace NM with crows.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #222 on: February 11, 2013, 07:26:44 AM »
Looks like the pedestal we've put the new recruits on is starting to crumble, by round 1 some will be calling for their heads  :shh

#backtosquareone?
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #223 on: February 11, 2013, 04:27:11 PM »
Mick Molloy reckons it's to do with us not being able to go north. He said there are two that should never go north. One lot are British backpackers, the other is the RFC.  ;D

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Rich v All stars
« Reply #224 on: February 11, 2013, 04:56:44 PM »
 :lol