Author Topic: Richmond vs Collingwood  (Read 46255 times)

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5862
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #270 on: April 21, 2013, 01:58:07 PM »
hate to say it ..but also think dimma and friends were outcoached yesterday

Yep absolutely smashed in the box. We were beaten in every way IMO. You move on and as much as it hurts to say Collingwood were too good, that was simply the case.

We are a 8th-10th team in the comp and when a top 4 side turn it on we can't match them yet, especially when we don't play our best footy.
Go Tigers!

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41233
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #271 on: April 21, 2013, 05:31:43 PM »


The fact it made it worse wasn't really Petterd's fault. Seeing his opposite number Harry o carve it up had me wondering why we had him play a loose man when he offers no run and carry.

I thought when we could've got 3/4 goals in front Harry O made the difference.
3/4 inside 50's, Cochin and Petterd none, IIRC but could be wrong.

Think he will be lucky to play next week. Batch is a far better option in the back half.

Just on the Harry O: Petterd was not one of the players who was supposed to lock him down and not allow him to sweep wide through the wing.  That Harry O was allowed to do what he did yesterday is an indictment on those who were assigned to him not Petterd.

« Last Edit: April 21, 2013, 06:44:08 PM by WilliamPowell »
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 41233
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #272 on: April 21, 2013, 05:38:36 PM »
Lets be really honest as supporters - do any of us really believe in our hearts that Grigg, Houli, Petterd, Aaron Edwards, Chris Knights et al can take us anywhere beyond say 7th or 8th. We were deadset in the basement, Hartley has done a good job but the players brought to the club only have the capability of getting us out of the basement and to 7th or 8th at best. How can we win a flag with our list? Newman is getting on, Jackson is improved but? Morris is slowly being worked out by opposition clubs, Maric is our only ruckman, We dont have a monster back to take on the monster forwards. We need more class in the middle.

If we finish with 12 wins or 7th or 8th Id be doing handstands because thats the quality of our list. We need better players, we need better development and our coaches need to improve. Getting in players like Aaron Edwards, Stephenson, Knights, Petterd etc. that aint going to get us anywhere down the track because as we top up Collingwood and clubs like Collingwood are finding kids like Jamie Elliott and thats where you become a great club, by getting in quality kids developing them and making them stars. Just my opinion.

While I understand your point and think you've made it really well my take is that me of reasons we've recruited the players you mention is to enable us to get 6th-8th now, play finals while also allowing some of our kids time to develop rather than being thrown in the depend. Perhaps these foot soldiers as you call them are short term so the talent we have below can take us the next step when they are ready and locks to do so

Not saying it's the right way or the wrong way but just maybe another way. Look at Geelong, they blood kids when the kids are ready, physically developed and have a really solid understand of the gameplan and what's expected of them. They earn their games rather than being gifted.
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #273 on: April 21, 2013, 06:45:05 PM »

While I understand your point and think you've made it really well my take is that me of reasons we've recruited the players you mention is to enable us to get 6th-8th now, play finals while also allowing some of our kids time to develop rather than being thrown in the depend. Perhaps these foot soldiers as you call them are short term so the talent we have below can take us the next step when they are ready and locks to do so

Not saying it's the right way or the wrong way but just maybe another way. Look at Geelong, they blood kids when the kids are ready, physically developed and have a really solid understand of the gameplan and what's expected of them. They earn their games rather than being gifted.

Which is what I reckon we are starting to do with Vlas et al this season.  First time under Hardwick's watch that we haven't played a number of kids straight up.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #274 on: April 21, 2013, 06:48:48 PM »
yeah leppa said that yesterday too. said that in any previous year he would be a walk up start.

he said it it is a good thing that you don't have to play your draft picks early on
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #275 on: April 21, 2013, 08:52:19 PM »
Thought Dimma was out coached today and made some poor mistakes.

1. Chaplain onto Cloke earlier.
2. Cloke 1 on 1. Vickers doesn't do anything else why didn't he get back the in the 3rd quarter
3.  Petterd as the loose man. Don't  want to see this again.
Harry O was causing us so much damage until Jackson was moved onto him yet we had to deal with a stagnate Pettered.

On Grigg...

He is a dime a dozen footballer. What he brings to the table is nothing more than say anyone else could.

no right foot. It can be argued if he has a left one also.

No pressure acts. Not good overhead.

I hope Vlast can take his spot and send him back to Coburg.

I thought Ramps was spot on. Our list with the likes of Bacha, Grigg, Petterd will get us to bottom reaches of the 8 at best. We need more quality.

Lets be really honest as supporters - do any of us really believe in our hearts that Grigg, Houli, Petterd, Aaron Edwards, Chris Knights et al can take us anywhere beyond say 7th or 8th. We were deadset in the basement, Hartley has done a good job but the players brought to the club only have the capability of getting us out of the basement and to 7th or 8th at best. How can we win a flag with our list? Newman is getting on, Jackson is improved but? Morris is slowly being worked out by opposition clubs, Maric is our only ruckman, We dont have a monster back to take on the monster forwards. We need more class in the middle.

If we finish with 12 wins or 7th or 8th Id be doing handstands because thats the quality of our list. We need better players, we need better development and our coaches need to improve. Getting in players like Aaron Edwards, Stephenson, Knights, Petterd etc. that aint going to get us anywhere down the track because as we top up Collingwood and clubs like Collingwood are finding kids like Jamie Elliott and thats where you become a great club, by getting in quality kids developing them and making them stars. Just my opinion.

Do you recall Geelong up to 2006? I recall everyone saying they were a team of one paced plodders, players like Corey, Bartel, Enright, Kelly were debated and offered up for trade with no takers  ;D

Collingwood 2007-2009 were considered a team of soldiers but light on for top end class. Look at them now.

I don't think people realise how important it is to have a team full of reliablesoldiers, once you know you can rely on a consistent output from these types it enables the stars to really shine and in the process one or 2 of those soliders surprise and develop into stars themselves. Who would have picked Swan to be a star 5 years ago?? the guy was a spud. The geelong midfield was criticised for being slow and one dimensional, several years later they are one the great sides of all time.

For all the soldiers we're bringing in we are still not there yet, and still need to stock up on afl standard players..As well as theyve gone this season, when you have players like McGuane, jackson, Petterd King etc in your side you know you're still a little short on. Players like Conca, Ellis, Vlas, Helbig look like soldiers atm and thats what they should be striving for, but if they are developed correctly they can turn into legitimate very good AFL standard players.

 We've done really well getting to where we are (from where we were) but if we continue bringing guys like Conca, Vlas, batch, Ellis and helbig through I have no doubt in 1-2 years we'll see the real benefit. Houli and Grigg have more ability than they are given credit for on these forums, but I do agree they both need to do more and get that element of downhill skiiing out of their system quick smart.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #276 on: April 21, 2013, 09:06:49 PM »
yeah leppa said that yesterday too. said that in any previous year he would be a walk up start.

he said it it is a good thing that you don't have to play your draft picks early on

This is absolute BS.  I was worried when I heard this from the club.
Development always should continue.  The better teams always develop a few new players every year. Look at Geelong, Collingwood and Hawthorn.  You'd think those teams would be really hard to get into but hey, they always inject youth into their team so they learn to play with the better players around them.  They learn where to run and how their team mates run.  They get confidence and develop faster than in the crap VFL system.  Last year Collingwood played Jamie Elliott. He hardly set the world on fire but they backed their judgement and this year he is a much improved player.  Hawthorn played Hill last year and Anderson this year. Both will improve because playing next to Hodge a co. is better than the spuds at Box Hill.  Geelong have also played youth despite having the best team of the last 6 years. Motlop and co. will be all the better playing with Selwood and co. than with other spuds in the VFL comp.
The recruiters have to back their judgement and keep playing kids.  Vlastuin should have played before Knights.  The latter is merely a back up for when an experienced guy gets injured.  He shouldn't be there taking up a development position.
Even the top teams do it.  Teams further down like us should be doing it even more.  Forget about the finals; we want a premiership.  Continue the process and the results will come automatically.  Never think you are too good to continue developing youngsters!
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #277 on: April 21, 2013, 09:29:54 PM »
Thought Dimma was out coached today and made some poor mistakes.

1. Chaplain onto Cloke earlier.
2. Cloke 1 on 1. Vickers doesn't do anything else why didn't he get back the in the 3rd quarter
3.  Petterd as the loose man. Don't  want to see this again.
Harry O was causing us so much damage until Jackson was moved onto him yet we had to deal with a stagnate Pettered.

On Grigg...

He is a dime a dozen footballer. What he brings to the table is nothing more than say anyone else could.

no right foot. It can be argued if he has a left one also.

No pressure acts. Not good overhead.

I hope Vlast can take his spot and send him back to Coburg.

I thought Ramps was spot on. Our list with the likes of Bacha, Grigg, Petterd will get us to bottom reaches of the 8 at best. We need more quality.

Lets be really honest as supporters - do any of us really believe in our hearts that Grigg, Houli, Petterd, Aaron Edwards, Chris Knights et al can take us anywhere beyond say 7th or 8th. We were deadset in the basement, Hartley has done a good job but the players brought to the club only have the capability of getting us out of the basement and to 7th or 8th at best. How can we win a flag with our list? Newman is getting on, Jackson is improved but? Morris is slowly being worked out by opposition clubs, Maric is our only ruckman, We dont have a monster back to take on the monster forwards. We need more class in the middle.

If we finish with 12 wins or 7th or 8th Id be doing handstands because thats the quality of our list. We need better players, we need better development and our coaches need to improve. Getting in players like Aaron Edwards, Stephenson, Knights, Petterd etc. that aint going to get us anywhere down the track because as we top up Collingwood and clubs like Collingwood are finding kids like Jamie Elliott and thats where you become a great club, by getting in quality kids developing them and making them stars. Just my opinion.

Do you recall Geelong up to 2006? I recall everyone saying they were a team of one paced plodders, players like Corey, Bartel, Enright, Kelly were debated and offered up for trade with no takers  ;D

Collingwood 2007-2009 were considered a team of soldiers but light on for top end class. Look at them now.

I don't think people realise how important it is to have a team full of reliablesoldiers, once you know you can rely on a consistent output from these types it enables the stars to really shine and in the process one or 2 of those soliders surprise and develop into stars themselves. Who would have picked Swan to be a star 5 years ago?? the guy was a spud. The geelong midfield was criticised for being slow and one dimensional, several years later they are one the great sides of all time.

For all the soldiers we're bringing in we are still not there yet, and still need to stock up on afl standard players..As well as theyve gone this season, when you have players like McGuane, jackson, Petterd King etc in your side you know you're still a little short on. Players like Conca, Ellis, Vlas, Helbig look like soldiers atm and thats what they should be striving for, but if they are developed correctly they can turn into legitimate very good AFL standard players.

 We've done really well getting to where we are (from where we were) but if we continue bringing guys like Conca, Vlas, batch, Ellis and helbig through I have no doubt in 1-2 years we'll see the real benefit. Houli and Grigg have more ability than they are given credit for on these forums, but I do agree they both need to do more and get that element of downhill skiiing out of their system quick smart.

I dont have a problem with bringing in the foot soldiers. If the philosophy is lets get some kids that we think will play 200 decent AFL games then I cant say I disagree with that, the question is how do we improve the list - do we continue to add these foot soldier types? do we continue to bring in more kids and hope we can find some stars? Do we continue to bring in the likes of Petterd Knights et al? Or do we chase 1 or 2 big names that can lift us to the next level?

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #278 on: April 21, 2013, 09:40:48 PM »
yeah leppa said that yesterday too. said that in any previous year he would be a walk up start.

he said it it is a good thing that you don't have to play your draft picks early on

This is absolute BS.  I was worried when I heard this from the club.
Development always should continue.  The better teams always develop a few new players every year. Look at Geelong, Collingwood and Hawthorn.  You'd think those teams would be really hard to get into but hey, they always inject youth into their team so they learn to play with the better players around them.  They learn where to run and how their team mates run.  They get confidence and develop faster than in the crap VFL system.  Last year Collingwood played Jamie Elliott. He hardly set the world on fire but they backed their judgement and this year he is a much improved player.  Hawthorn played Hill last year and Anderson this year. Both will improve because playing next to Hodge a co. is better than the spuds at Box Hill.  Geelong have also played youth despite having the best team of the last 6 years. Motlop and co. will be all the better playing with Selwood and co. than with other spuds in the VFL comp.
The recruiters have to back their judgement and keep playing kids.  Vlastuin should have played before Knights.  The latter is merely a back up for when an experienced guy gets injured.  He shouldn't be there taking up a development position.
Even the top teams do it.  Teams further down like us should be doing it even more.  Forget about the finals; we want a premiership.  Continue the process and the results will come automatically.  Never think you are too good to continue developing youngsters!

In his 1st season Elliot didn't play until Round 9.
In his 1st season Hill played in Round 4 as a sub and then not again until Round 10.
In his 1st season Anderson played 3 games and has done a hamstring.
In his 1st season Motlop played 1 game and 4 in his 2nd.

Vlastuin, McBean, McDonough Williams, McIntosh etc will all benefit by not playing full senior AFL games from Round 1.  Just like all the other players in the top sides you mentioned.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #279 on: April 21, 2013, 09:41:43 PM »
Thought Dimma was out coached today and made some poor mistakes.

1. Chaplain onto Cloke earlier.
2. Cloke 1 on 1. Vickers doesn't do anything else why didn't he get back the in the 3rd quarter
3.  Petterd as the loose man. Don't  want to see this again.
Harry O was causing us so much damage until Jackson was moved onto him yet we had to deal with a stagnate Pettered.

On Grigg...

He is a dime a dozen footballer. What he brings to the table is nothing more than say anyone else could.

no right foot. It can be argued if he has a left one also.

No pressure acts. Not good overhead.

I hope Vlast can take his spot and send him back to Coburg.

I thought Ramps was spot on. Our list with the likes of Bacha, Grigg, Petterd will get us to bottom reaches of the 8 at best. We need more quality.

Lets be really honest as supporters - do any of us really believe in our hearts that Grigg, Houli, Petterd, Aaron Edwards, Chris Knights et al can take us anywhere beyond say 7th or 8th. We were deadset in the basement, Hartley has done a good job but the players brought to the club only have the capability of getting us out of the basement and to 7th or 8th at best. How can we win a flag with our list? Newman is getting on, Jackson is improved but? Morris is slowly being worked out by opposition clubs, Maric is our only ruckman, We dont have a monster back to take on the monster forwards. We need more class in the middle.

If we finish with 12 wins or 7th or 8th Id be doing handstands because thats the quality of our list. We need better players, we need better development and our coaches need to improve. Getting in players like Aaron Edwards, Stephenson, Knights, Petterd etc. that aint going to get us anywhere down the track because as we top up Collingwood and clubs like Collingwood are finding kids like Jamie Elliott and thats where you become a great club, by getting in quality kids developing them and making them stars. Just my opinion.

Do you recall Geelong up to 2006? I recall everyone saying they were a team of one paced plodders, players like Corey, Bartel, Enright, Kelly were debated and offered up for trade with no takers  ;D

Collingwood 2007-2009 were considered a team of soldiers but light on for top end class. Look at them now.

I don't think people realise how important it is to have a team full of reliablesoldiers, once you know you can rely on a consistent output from these types it enables the stars to really shine and in the process one or 2 of those soliders surprise and develop into stars themselves. Who would have picked Swan to be a star 5 years ago?? the guy was a spud. The geelong midfield was criticised for being slow and one dimensional, several years later they are one the great sides of all time.

For all the soldiers we're bringing in we are still not there yet, and still need to stock up on afl standard players..As well as theyve gone this season, when you have players like McGuane, jackson, Petterd King etc in your side you know you're still a little short on. Players like Conca, Ellis, Vlas, Helbig look like soldiers atm and thats what they should be striving for, but if they are developed correctly they can turn into legitimate very good AFL standard players.

 We've done really well getting to where we are (from where we were) but if we continue bringing guys like Conca, Vlas, batch, Ellis and helbig through I have no doubt in 1-2 years we'll see the real benefit. Houli and Grigg have more ability than they are given credit for on these forums, but I do agree they both need to do more and get that element of downhill skiiing out of their system quick smart.

I dont have a problem with bringing in the foot soldiers. If the philosophy is lets get some kids that we think will play 200 decent AFL games then I cant say I disagree with that, the question is how do we improve the list - do we continue to add these foot soldier types? do we continue to bring in more kids and hope we can find some stars? Do we continue to bring in the likes of Petterd Knights et al? Or do we chase 1 or 2 big names that can lift us to the next level?

Keep improving the list as we have with these types and keep drafting and developing good young talent that will hopefully turn into the stars. aka sydney's system  :thumbsup It's served us really well over the past 3 years, why not keep going? If guys like Conca, Ellis, Vlas don't turn into elite or at least very good players then we need to look at why that is - Is it 1) Are we drafting the right kids? and 2) are we developing them as well as we could be?

I think we have the right blueprint, just a question of continuing to improve and get better in everything. Get better development coaches, get better recruiters, at least we have the foundations now of a proper functioning football department.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #280 on: April 21, 2013, 09:49:55 PM »


The fact it made it worse wasn't really Petterd's fault. Seeing his opposite number Harry o carve it up had me wondering why we had him play a loose man when he offers no run and carry.

I thought when we could've got 3/4 goals in front Harry O made the difference.
3/4 inside 50's, Cochin and Petterd none, IIRC but could be wrong.

Think he will be lucky to play next week. Batch is a far better option in the back half.

Just on the Harry O: Petterd was not one of the players who was supposed to lock him down and not allow him to sweep wide through the wing.  That Harry O was allowed to do what he did yesterday is an indictment on those who were assigned to him not Petterd.

Who were they?

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #281 on: April 21, 2013, 10:01:49 PM »
yeah leppa said that yesterday too. said that in any previous year he would be a walk up start.

he said it it is a good thing that you don't have to play your draft picks early on

This is absolute BS.  I was worried when I heard this from the club.
Development always should continue.  The better teams always develop a few new players every year. Look at Geelong, Collingwood and Hawthorn.  You'd think those teams would be really hard to get into but hey, they always inject youth into their team so they learn to play with the better players around them.  They learn where to run and how their team mates run.  They get confidence and develop faster than in the crap VFL system.  Last year Collingwood played Jamie Elliott. He hardly set the world on fire but they backed their judgement and this year he is a much improved player.  Hawthorn played Hill last year and Anderson this year. Both will improve because playing next to Hodge a co. is better than the spuds at Box Hill.  Geelong have also played youth despite having the best team of the last 6 years. Motlop and co. will be all the better playing with Selwood and co. than with other spuds in the VFL comp.
The recruiters have to back their judgement and keep playing kids.  Vlastuin should have played before Knights.  The latter is merely a back up for when an experienced guy gets injured.  He shouldn't be there taking up a development position.
Even the top teams do it.  Teams further down like us should be doing it even more.  Forget about the finals; we want a premiership.  Continue the process and the results will come automatically.  Never think you are too good to continue developing youngsters!

In his 1st season Elliot didn't play until Round 9.
In his 1st season Hill played in Round 4 as a sub and then not again until Round 10.
In his 1st season Anderson played 3 games and has done a hamstring.
In his 1st season Motlop played 1 game and 4 in his 2nd.

Vlastuin, McBean, McDonough Williams, McIntosh etc will all benefit by not playing full senior AFL games from Round 1.  Just like all the other players in the top sides you mentioned.
Motlop was injured which stopped them playing him. As you said Anderson is only out because he is injured. Collingwood played Dwyer on Saturday. Playing in front of 80,000 is an education you cannot get playing in the VFL. He has only played 3 games.
All I'm saying is that the club should be playing its best youngsters as much as it can. That includes Griffiths. I can't imagine them putting Tyrone down back as a defender and then dropping him after one game if he is beaten. That is hat they have effectively done with Ben. And I think Ben has a bigger upside to him than Tyrone, especially as a forward.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #282 on: April 21, 2013, 10:17:16 PM »

In his 1st season Elliot didn't play until Round 9.
In his 1st season Hill played in Round 4 as a sub and then not again until Round 10.
In his 1st season Anderson played 3 games and has done a hamstring.
In his 1st season Motlop played 1 game and 4 in his 2nd.

Vlastuin, McBean, McDonough Williams, McIntosh etc will all benefit by not playing full senior AFL games from Round 1.  Just like all the other players in the top sides you mentioned.
Motlop was injured which stopped them playing him. As you said Anderson is only out because he is injured. Collingwood played Dwyer on Saturday. Playing in front of 80,000 is an education you cannot get playing in the VFL. He has only played 3 games.
All I'm saying is that the club should be playing its best youngsters as much as it can. That includes Griffiths. I can't imagine them putting Tyrone down back as a defender and then dropping him after one game if he is beaten. That is hat they have effectively done with Ben. And I think Ben has a bigger upside to him than Tyrone, especially as a forward.

Dwyer is 26 years old and comes off a season with last year's VFL Premiership team.  He doesn't need 'development' in the sense that kids do.  Al and I were only talking about the benefit of not having to play the kids from Round 1 like we had been forced to do the past few season and how other top sides didn't do that (which was what Leppa was referring to), and I think I highlighted that with every example you quoted, even Anderson who is now injured after only 3 games.  Play the youngsters yes, but not from season's start.  Let's give them time to adapt to playing senior football at increased pressure/pace before chucking them in at the deep end - thats what the good sides do.  And re: players like Griff etc, regardless of the armchair ride you might perceive others (Vickery) to have had, Griff could always do his cause the world of good by actually taking a game by the scruff of the neck at the lower level and being a very good, dominant player.  That would be a fine way to stake his claim!

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100473
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #283 on: April 22, 2013, 03:07:24 PM »
From Mark Robinson's "The Tackle" section in the Herald-Sun:

DISLIKES

7. Richmond


Might be annoyed because I picked them, but was more annoyed with the lack of defensive attitude, which I had been praising in recent weeks.

Maybe they're not good enough. Maybe the Magpies are very good, notwithstanding what happened against the Hawks. Tackling isn't everything, but laying just 33 is worrying.

In Adelaide, the Crows laid a all-time high 95. The Tiger faithful were saying a poor 20 minutes killed them. I disagree. It was a poor 120 minutes. They were lucky to be leading at half-time, were munched in the third, and pedestrian in the last.

Same old mistakes haunted the same old players: Jackson mistakes, Martin after half-time, Petterd inconsistent and overall, they couldn't run and carry through the middle - #realitycheck.


Read more: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/breaking-news/the-tackle-wolves-still-out-for-melbourne-despite-breakthrough-win/story-e6frfkp9-1226625432497#ixzz2RAKqqojn

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Richmond vs Collingwood
« Reply #284 on: April 22, 2013, 03:34:38 PM »
Jackson hack0la.