Author Topic: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY  (Read 10664 times)

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5295
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #15 on: May 19, 2013, 06:24:51 PM »
Rance had a few minutes there that he would to take back.
Nahas clearly does not want to be there.
Foley, can't expect too much this early from an absence as long as his. Glad to see him get some miles into his legs.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #16 on: May 19, 2013, 06:38:33 PM »
Its going to be a slaughter next week regardless who plays, based on our performance today.

Bombers lost to lions yesterday mate, take a chill pill
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #17 on: May 19, 2013, 06:39:33 PM »
yeah yeah ban me for telling it now it is

foley is not Good enough  nor ready so why is he in the team
nahas same boat and has lost speed and confidence and desire

rance is a dunce full stop

yeah ban me cos I won't accept mediocrity in the team

losers

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #18 on: May 19, 2013, 06:43:00 PM »
and what the f has Foley done

10 tackles.  Next question?

wow amazing
how many clearances
contested possies
how.many lines did he break or link up


we are a shocking clearance team without tuck

but Foley needs to be better and he won't be
3 games in and vlas makes Foley look like a monkey

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2501
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #19 on: May 19, 2013, 06:43:27 PM »
yeah yeah ban me for telling it now it is

foley is not Good enough  nor ready so why is he in the team
nahas same boat and has lost speed and confidence and desire

rance is a dunce full stop

yeah ban me cos I won't accept mediocrity in the team

losers

There should be some sort of breathalyzer that wont allow you on the forum if you are over the limit.

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #20 on: May 19, 2013, 06:47:48 PM »
for water?

pull ur head out of the sand

Offline Crazy_Ivan

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #21 on: May 19, 2013, 06:52:32 PM »
Agree on Nahas.
Rance i,ll play to the end of the year to keep his trade price up.{Rance for Frawley would do me}.Sick of Rances brain fades.
Not sure what your on about Foley.{Must have refused an autograph id say}

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #22 on: May 19, 2013, 06:54:40 PM »
Hard to get motivated against poor opposition.....the test will be next week.....I'll keep my powder dry 'till then.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #23 on: May 19, 2013, 07:03:32 PM »
Nahas - gorn, gawn gonski, gone!
Rance - appallingly embarrassing when Dawes who is underdone is giving him a bath.
Foley - Yeah he was fumbly and had no impact but settle down, 2nd game back give him a chance.

Online The Machine

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3576
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #24 on: May 19, 2013, 07:15:17 PM »
Nahas - gorn, gawn gonski, gone!
Rance - appallingly embarrassing when Dawes who is underdone is giving him a bath.
Foley - Yeah he was fumbly and had no impact but settle down, 2nd game back give him a chance.




Dawes marked on the lead a few time but he certainly didn't give Rance a bath. Nahas on the other hand should not be played for the rest of the year. Playing for himself = not good enough!

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #25 on: May 19, 2013, 07:18:03 PM »
Nahas - gorn, gawn gonski, gone!
Rance - appallingly embarrassing when Dawes who is underdone is giving him a bath.
Foley - Yeah he was fumbly and had no impact but settle down, 2nd game back give him a chance.




Dawes marked on the lead a few time but he certainly didn't give Rance a bath. Nahas on the other hand should not be played for the rest of the year. Playing for himself = not good enough!

first half was embarrassing, Rance couldnt go with him and got done point blank 5-6 times. He wouldve had 3 early but for Davey seagulling a cheapie in the square. Ran out of puff after halftime so Rance came back into it, but worrying signs and Im a Rance fan!

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #26 on: May 19, 2013, 07:20:32 PM »
Foley 2nd game back not good enough.. he ain't ready or good enough so why play him
next week u will.say it's just his 3rd game back blah blah blah

and rance.. has been beaten every game this year... every game he has been panced
Hardwick is a fhead cos he keeps him in the team.
8 Weeks he has been shut ffs

Offline TigerLand

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5288
  • I <3 Mrs Hardwick
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #27 on: May 19, 2013, 07:22:37 PM »
yeah yeah ban me for telling it now it is

foley is not Good enough  nor ready so why is he in the team
nahas same boat and has lost speed and confidence and desire

rance is a dunce full stop

yeah ban me cos I won't accept mediocrity in the team

losers

Get a grip mate. We won by 5 goals played poorly and had double the scoring shots with 50% conversion rate.

Mediocrity would have lost to a side like Melbourne.

Our leaders were a bit flat and Ellis and Vlastiun shined. Have a beer mate and relax on a Sunday night.
Go Tigers!

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #28 on: May 19, 2013, 07:28:03 PM »
So many lulz

Online The Machine

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3576
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #29 on: May 19, 2013, 07:28:34 PM »
Nahas - gorn, gawn gonski, gone!
Rance - appallingly embarrassing when Dawes who is underdone is giving him a bath.
Foley - Yeah he was fumbly and had no impact but settle down, 2nd game back give him a chance.




Dawes marked on the lead a few time but he certainly didn't give Rance a bath. Nahas on the other hand should not be played for the rest of the year. Playing for himself = not good enough!

first half was embarrassing, Rance couldnt go with him and got done point blank 5-6 times. He wouldve had 3 early but for Davey seagulling a cheapie in the square. Ran out of puff after halftime so Rance came back into it, but worrying signs and Im a Rance fan!

 
Batch was on him for the first 20 mins which was not a good match up for us and Rance was moved onto him during the first quarter. Agree it wasn't Rances best game but played the game out and took a few great marks deep which was important. We need another tall defender so Rance can play 3rd tall IMO.