Author Topic: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY  (Read 10671 times)

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #30 on: May 19, 2013, 07:30:42 PM »
we should get the other tall back this week...Grimes

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #31 on: May 19, 2013, 07:38:10 PM »
don't drink Beer

and all good teams gain huge percentage against the demons and shut teams. except us

gws and gold coast would have beaten us today

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13163
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #32 on: May 19, 2013, 08:28:57 PM »
Any chance this thread could be stickied, it feels like every week I am reading a new hate thread on these guys

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5280
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #33 on: May 19, 2013, 08:45:38 PM »
Rance: He has no confidence deep in defence and he should be playing CHB were he is less venerable.

Foley: 1st full match of the year.

Nahas: White was more of an i fluence then him today. Out Nahas, In White.

McGuane: Horrible today! He should spend time at Coburg I would say!

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13163
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #34 on: May 19, 2013, 08:47:09 PM »
Rance: He has no confidence deep in defence and he should be playing CHB were he is less venerable.

Foley: 1st full match of the year.

Nahas: White was more of an i fluence then him today. Out Nahas, In White.

McGuane: Horrible today! He should spend time at Coburg I would say!

What drugs you on White is already in

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #35 on: May 19, 2013, 08:50:39 PM »
Rance: He has no confidence deep in defence and he should be playing CHB were he is less venerable.

Foley: 1st full match of the year.

Nahas: White was more of an i fluence then him today. Out Nahas, In White.

McGuane: Horrible today! He should spend time at Coburg I would say!

What drugs you on White is already in

he meant in the starting line up not sub

white in 40 min of footy had more influence than rance foley and nahas combined

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13163
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #36 on: May 19, 2013, 09:12:38 PM »
Rance: He has no confidence deep in defence and he should be playing CHB were he is less venerable.

Foley: 1st full match of the year.

Nahas: White was more of an i fluence then him today. Out Nahas, In White.

McGuane: Horrible today! He should spend time at Coburg I would say!

What drugs you on White is already in

he meant in the starting line up not sub

white in 40 min of footy had more influence than rance foley and nahas combined

So does he mean Nana is sub or what, if he is out let's put him right out and down to the burghers

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #37 on: May 19, 2013, 10:01:38 PM »
Nahas is gawn.
Foley was always going to have a better week in his first game back after a long absence. Will be better for the run.
Rance does a great thing then a terrible thing then another terrible thing. Confidence is shot needs to get back to basics and play within his limitations to get the mojo back.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #38 on: May 19, 2013, 10:04:48 PM »
Can't play King and Nahas.

Can't play King, Nahas and White.

Good teams will crush us.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #39 on: May 19, 2013, 10:06:51 PM »
Can't play King and Nahas.

Can't play King, Nahas and White.

Good teams will crush us.

Agreed King is first choice and White as a sub like in Perth v Freo to add pace on a big ground.

Nahas is a shadow of the player he was in 2011.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #40 on: May 19, 2013, 10:33:55 PM »
King is critical to our forward line structure at present and was one of our best today.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #41 on: May 19, 2013, 11:48:29 PM »
have a lot of time for nathan foley and it will take a bit of time with the amount of footy hes missed. no choice but continue to play him especially with tuck injured.
rance well if we are serious and some one has performed at coburg it is time to act. hes bloody poor.and has been for a long time.some things are easy to see but its amazing how many refuse to.
nahas well hes an unskilled small plodder always has been.

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #42 on: May 20, 2013, 12:13:40 AM »
Thread needs more armchair vitriol.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #43 on: May 20, 2013, 12:52:12 AM »
You have to just laugh at Rance's name in this thread and the reasoning for it. At the game it was fairly obvious Batch was on him for both Dawes goals. But I thought nah I'll check the replay if I'm mistaken. Nope not mistaken. Just a clear vendetta against one player. He stuffed up 2 kicks 1 of which he made up for. Rest of his game was good. Last week he was very good as well with his kicking.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: RANCE NAHAS and FOLEY
« Reply #44 on: May 20, 2013, 12:56:30 AM »
Any chance this thread could be stickied, it feels like every week I am reading a new hate thread on these guys
hate now thats a strong word little head in the sand chucky. its more like honest appraisal.  the truth hurts sometimes i suppose.
the truth is he struggles to compete one on one. he falls over, regularly misjudges the ball in the air and regularly makes howlers with ball in hand. thats exactly what you dont want from your kpds.
  if that is hate then yes im guilty of it, but lets face it, the reality is its nothing more than honesty.