Author Topic: We should have drafted Heppell  (Read 4315 times)

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #30 on: July 17, 2013, 08:43:25 PM »
buying time and awareness are pretty much the same thing. (and conca does that in traffic too, and doesnt squib)

Conca is fantastic in traffic. That's his best strength. He and Titch are highly underrated at the clearances.
Reece started the year like a gun and had an 8 week layoff.
Meantime Heppell's been pumping himself full of lord knows what.
Comparisons at this point are early IMO. A lot thought Cotch was going to be a mistake early too before he exploded once he got past his injuries.
we arent watching the same player then.  dont know how many times ive seen conca just panic with ball in hand  or get run down when he shouldnt.  reckon i will be paying more attention to him now. maybe im missing something.

You are claw, Concas biggest strength is his ability to hit packs at full pace clean pickup and weave out, has been doing thsat from the start. Is a better inside mid already and has been playing without a preseason, heard dermie saying earlier this year he gets the feeling Conca is going at abt 50-60% of what he's capable of doing and I agree with that.

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5004
  • All up inside ya.
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #31 on: July 17, 2013, 09:44:27 PM »
Claw, I get the feeling that if you watched as many Essendon games as you do Richmond games, you would find a way to bag ShortSteppel too.
You have an uncanny knack for finding fault with our players. If they were as poo as you make them out to be then we'd be sitting bottom of the ladder.
FWIW, I rate Heppel, but Concs was going along very nicely before his injury too. Let's hold off on the shoulda/coulda/wouldas for a year or two.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #32 on: July 17, 2013, 10:17:18 PM »
Actually reckon Conca works better under pressure and hits targets. When he has time he must be over thinking it.
P.S since when has Heppell had a good game as a midfielder. Only good ones I've seen are a loose backman

Offline LondonTiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #33 on: July 17, 2013, 10:50:54 PM »
Conca, Ellis and Vlastuin were not only selected because they could play footy they were selected because they bring to the table a cultural shift in terms of what type of player we want at Richmond. Whilst Heppel may be a better player, I dont think he would help change the culture of Richmond which has been nothing short of disgraceful since the early 1980s.

Spot on and agree wholeheartedly.  Character and talent of a footy team wins premierships, not talent alone.    Conca needs a full year of no injurys.  He was having a great year before the injury.  Heppell is good, but he tends to wilt under pressure. 

Offline Crazy_Ivan

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #34 on: July 17, 2013, 11:24:32 PM »
maybe im missing something.
Maybe????

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #35 on: July 17, 2013, 11:56:44 PM »
Pre draft I wanted heppell. However upon close inspection he is a batty hot. Concaa is an Italian stallion and will be the superior player.

Offline Tigers of Old

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 263
  • @Tigers_of_Old
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #36 on: July 17, 2013, 11:58:08 PM »
we arent watching the same player then.  dont know how many times ive seen conca just panic with ball in hand  or get run down when he shouldnt.  reckon i will be paying more attention to him now. maybe im missing something.

Weagles interest in him not enough evidence for you? ;)
2015.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #37 on: July 17, 2013, 11:59:02 PM »
I call bollocks to concs regularly getting run down or panicky

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #38 on: July 18, 2013, 08:45:13 AM »
all that has happened is a poster has rightly pointed out we should have taken heppell because hes a better player with a far greater upside still.

You say rightly , I say wrongly
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #39 on: July 18, 2013, 09:45:49 AM »
We should of..........we should of.......we should of done a lot.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #40 on: July 18, 2013, 09:52:49 AM »
In his first season every game con a.. got a head injury.

Why heppell was running around loose.


This is not coincidence. Concs is genuinely inside and tough

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #41 on: July 18, 2013, 01:31:30 PM »
In my opinion Lighter fluid is a far superior drink to Meth's.

Coulda, woulda, shoulda, Didn't...Lets move on  :sleep

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #42 on: July 18, 2013, 02:27:41 PM »
Heppell's 36 disposal, 2.2 game was a disgrace.

Offline tiga

  • Exhaling Carbon in the
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5547
  • Yes Hampson has taken a mark!
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #43 on: July 18, 2013, 02:31:49 PM »

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: We should have drafted Heppell
« Reply #44 on: July 18, 2013, 02:32:48 PM »
:fishing