Throw the kitchen sink to get both Adams and Shiel IMHO.
A mate at work said to me that he had heard that the Blues have offered/ will offer Hampson and Robinson for both Shiels and Adams. If that were true, and GWS were considering it, I doubt it would be hard to trump.
I think it comes down to
want versus
need. Do we really need one or both Adams and Shiels? I would argue that we would need one, maybe not both - though we would want both. It would come down to what GWS want and need as well (obviously).
Question for those in the know, do GWS still have a larger list than all other AFL teams, and over the course of the next 1-3 needs to trim it to be inline with the lists of all other teams? Because if thats the case, I would suggest we couldn't get away with a >2 Richmond players for 2 GWS players. It would have to be even numbers (ie 2 for 2). I also don't think that a first round pick should be included forn the above reasons and that GWS want established players.
I'd vote for Foley and Griffiths/ Batchelor if that was enough - though I highly doubt it would be. Would have to tag along in another trade (the Bruce to St Kilda deal, or the Delany to St Kilda deal etc).