Author Topic: Richmond receives no compo for losing Matthew White [updated]  (Read 8594 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Compo pick(s)?
« Reply #45 on: October 18, 2013, 08:45:16 AM »
What a complete cock up is this FA rubbish!!!!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4261
Re: Compo pick(s)?
« Reply #46 on: October 18, 2013, 08:46:13 AM »
What benefit does the Lions get for signing after Friday rather than before other than to screw us over?

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Compo pick(s)?
« Reply #47 on: October 18, 2013, 08:52:18 AM »
What benefit does the Lions get for signing after Friday rather than before other than to screw us over?

None as far as I know, expect for the ability to not sign him until the last minute in November, keeping their options open.  Luke will look a bit silly if they pick someone else up in the interim and renege on their deal (if there is one on the table) because then he will have to nominate for the draft.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97315
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Compo pick(s)?
« Reply #48 on: October 18, 2013, 05:47:22 PM »
Patrick Keane ‏@AFL_PKeane twitter:

AFL has determined free agency compensation selections for clubs at end of free agency period today and notified clubs late this afternoon.

Collingwood - Rd 1 compensation pick for loss of Dale Thomas.

Hawthorn - Rd 1 compensation pick for loss of Lance Franklin.

Melbourne - Rd 2 compensation pick, loss of Colin Sylvia.

St Kilda - Rd 2 compensation pick, loss of Nick Dal Santo.




Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Compo pick(s)?
« Reply #49 on: October 18, 2013, 05:49:03 PM »
Eh?

Nothing for white?

 What  croc of crap

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97315
    • One-Eyed Richmond
No compo pick for Matty White :(
« Reply #50 on: October 18, 2013, 05:49:39 PM »
Patrick Keane ‏@AFL_PKeane 8s

Richmond - No compensation for loss of M White,due to offer / player age.

Hawthorn - No compensation for loss of X Ellis,due to offer / age.


WTF?  :P

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Compo pick(s)?
« Reply #51 on: October 18, 2013, 05:50:39 PM »
AFL is a joke but this is beyond the joke bit  >:(

Cheating pig-dog scum fat pricks

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97315
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond receives no compo for losing Matthew White [updated]
« Reply #52 on: October 18, 2013, 06:06:42 PM »
Matty White is still only 26. If he's that "old" then why did Port give him a 3-year contract!  ::)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Richmond receives no compo for losing Matthew White [updated]
« Reply #53 on: October 18, 2013, 06:09:57 PM »
Younger than farkering Sylvia

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Richmond receives no compo for losing Matthew White [updated]
« Reply #54 on: October 18, 2013, 06:14:02 PM »
what an absolute stuffen joke, Im bloody ropable over this I was expecting a r2 , at worst r3...talk about an injustice :banghead
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Richmond receives no compo for losing Matthew White [updated]
« Reply #55 on: October 18, 2013, 06:14:31 PM »
You can't realistically be any younger than 26 to be a restricted free agent because you can't get drafted until you are almost 18.  It must work against you being younger but I would have thought it should work for you - the younger the player you lose, the more valuable he was because of potential years of service left.  He must have gone to Port for peanuts is all I can think because that doesn't fit with other compo picks in the past.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Richmond receives no compo for losing Matthew White [updated]
« Reply #56 on: October 18, 2013, 06:16:52 PM »
o compensation for loss of M White,due to offer / player age.

Cause he was not offered 9 years only 3?   :banghead

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97315
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond receives no compo for losing Matthew White [updated]
« Reply #57 on: October 18, 2013, 06:17:38 PM »
Smokey, Port offered White 3-years on $300k p.a.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Richmond receives no compo for losing Matthew White [updated]
« Reply #58 on: October 18, 2013, 06:19:07 PM »
Get a grip- Matt White couldn't even get a regular game in our starting 18 this year. And we still have some very average players doing so.
Age has nothing to do with it, he simply isn't much chop.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Richmond receives no compo for losing Matthew White [updated]
« Reply #59 on: October 18, 2013, 06:24:13 PM »
You can't realistically be any younger than 26 to be a restricted free agent because you can't get drafted until you are almost 18.  It must work against you being younger but I would have thought it should work for you - the younger the player you lose, the more valuable he was because of potential years of service left.  He must have gone to Port for peanuts is all I can think because that doesn't fit with other compo picks in the past.
Smoke, you have been on fire in this thread!  :thumbsup
I wish you were doing the compo  for us for the White loss, we would have Boyd for sure.  :cheers