Author Topic: Nathan Gordon [merged]  (Read 22546 times)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #60 on: November 22, 2013, 08:48:53 PM »
Couple o weeks

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #61 on: November 22, 2013, 09:23:16 PM »
I have it from a reliable source that a couple years (no more than three) development in the Richmond reserves and this guy will be ready to go
Funny. My source said similar except he said 4 years max.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5090
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #62 on: November 23, 2013, 01:23:54 AM »
Mature recruits dont necessarily have to slot straight in. They can develop further in the twos or just increase competition for spots. It might take an injury or form slump to a regular player for Gordon to get his chance, but that doesnt mean he's been a wasted pick.
Its not Round 1 or fail for mature recruits.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #63 on: November 23, 2013, 02:08:26 AM »
Mature recruits dont necessarily have to slot straight in. They can develop further in the twos or just increase competition for spots. It might take an injury or form slump to a regular player for Gordon to get his chance, but that doesnt mean he's been a wasted pick.
Its not Round 1 or fail for mature recruits.
Yes it is. FFS. In fact this is already a fail.  :banghead

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #64 on: November 23, 2013, 03:18:36 AM »
Honesrky last time  say it

If gordo goes into.a pack

 Instead of skirting out the out side and running in a forwards k
Direction regardless who's wins the ball
... ala griggg

Massive win for rfc

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #65 on: November 23, 2013, 03:20:44 AM »
Mature recruits dont necessarily have to slot straight in. They can develop further in the twos or just increase competition for spots. It might take an injury or form slump to a regular player for Gordon to get his chance, but that doesnt mean he's been a wasted pick.
Its not Round 1 or fail for mature recruits.
Yes it is. FFS. In fact this is already a fail.  :banghead

Atm

The weakness of the 22: Foley Jackson s Edwards houli etc.

If gorodo forces only one out - or makes em.play. better to keep spot


Bes more than worth p50


To clarify grigg is too squob-like

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #66 on: November 23, 2013, 09:56:54 AM »
Should be ready to go and hitting his straps by 40... :whistle
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #67 on: November 23, 2013, 10:49:38 AM »
I don't understand why jacko is still a weakness in the 22..12 months ago I would have agreed with you,but  certainly not now .In 2013 he turned his form around completely.That was reflected in his B&F win.
Foley still has question marks I agree.
And if its Tich Edwards you are refering to ,yes I think he also need to get on his bike in 2014

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #68 on: November 23, 2013, 11:46:36 AM »
Mature recruits dont necessarily have to slot straight in. They can develop further in the twos or just increase competition for spots. It might take an injury or form slump to a regular player for Gordon to get his chance, but that doesnt mean he's been a wasted pick.
Its not Round 1 or fail for mature recruits.

Really?????? Just like Podsiadly and old mate from Freo, honestly, ask yourself why we would recruit a player of 23 years old if he wasn't going to be a walk up start. No development or backup player crap. He either plays round one and more or we have wasted a pick IMO.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #69 on: November 23, 2013, 12:02:55 PM »
lmao
 
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #70 on: November 23, 2013, 12:19:27 PM »
Dan Currie says hi.

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5090
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #71 on: November 23, 2013, 12:23:21 PM »
Mature recruits dont necessarily have to slot straight in. They can develop further in the twos or just increase competition for spots. It might take an injury or form slump to a regular player for Gordon to get his chance, but that doesnt mean he's been a wasted pick.
Its not Round 1 or fail for mature recruits.

Really?????? Just like Podsiadly and old mate from Freo, honestly, ask yourself why we would recruit a player of 23 years old if he wasn't going to be a walk up start. No development or backup player crap. He either plays round one and more or we have wasted a pick IMO.

Say Foley's form has been average for the first three rounds and he gets dropped for Gordon who has performed well for RFC 2s. Gordon comes in plays his role well and keeps his spot for the remainder of the year, in what is a strong and competitive midfield. You believe that irrespective of this he is already a wasted pick because he didnt play round 1, right? If so, we'l agree to disagree.
If not, then admit that 'round 1 or fail' is a stupid concept and it's clearly not that black and white.

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #72 on: November 23, 2013, 12:23:41 PM »
Dan Currie says hi.
Don't be ridiculous. He was 25 not 23. Stupid comparison.  :banghead

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #73 on: November 23, 2013, 12:30:18 PM »
Dan Currie says hi.
Don't be ridiculous. He was 25 not 23. Stupid comparison.  :banghead

 :lol

To split hairs I just looked up his birthday. Was 23 when drafted, currently 24  ;D

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Pick 50: Nathan Gordon
« Reply #74 on: November 23, 2013, 12:46:35 PM »
Dan Currie says hi.
Don't be ridiculous. He was 25 not 23. Stupid comparison.  :banghead

 :lol

To split hairs I just looked up his birthday. Was 23 when drafted, currently 24  ;D
Whatever. stuff off and leave me alone.  :banghead :banghead