Deledio free to play / tribunal appeal successful [updated]

[Penelope]

stuff me, he wasn't even looking at him when he struck him.Tuckers comparison to the gibson incident is apt.
these filthy rooster gobblers are a disgrace, as is is the emphasis on result rather than intent.
stuff me, looking at the link tony gave,even viney is being screwed for being hard at the ball.

girly softies can GFTS

If Conca stayed down for a while had his jaw busted or Richmond submitted a non favourable medical report to the MRP that same incident would have a totally different adjudication.

This is not a match review panel this is merely a panel that is suspending players based on keeping mums and dads happy in that footy is no longer rough and violent.

How can Fyfe be given two weeks or young Viney go straight to a tribunal yet if the bloke gets up like Garry Hocking after Dipper gave him a beauty and continues to play Officer Bar Brady claims nothing to see here folks. Malakies boys.

it really is sad isnt it?

i remember when someone could be charged with attempted striking.

Now, if you prepare for contact and you opponent doesn't, and they get hurt, you get crucified.

but if your intent is to hurt the opponent and by nothing more than good luck you don't hurt them too bad, then you get off.

it's just mental, and most people can see it, except those half wits setting the agenda

[Penelope]

Lids this week is "intentional" yet Winderlich's last week was "reckless" .

Welcome to MRP world  .

Not sure what you are on about OE.

looking directly at the bloke while you hit him high is clearly reckless, while not looking at him  is clearly intentional.

would love some bozo in the media to to put this to those that make the decisions, but none of them have the balls, or the brains, to do so

[🏅Dooks]

[one-eyed]

Lids this week is "intentional" yet Winderlich's last week was "reckless" .

Welcome to MRP world  .

Not sure what you are on about OE.

looking directly at the bloke while you hit him high is clearly reckless, while not looking at him  is clearly intentional.

would love some bozo in the media to to put this to those that make the decisions, but none of them have the balls, or the brains, to do so

Lids was initially looking at Stokes. He was pushed towards Stokes by another Geelong player.

In any case, both pics are an elbow to the head and Winderlich had more time to think what he was doing. They are either both "intentional" or both "reckless". 

[Penelope]

hmm, should re-read i think 

[one-eyed]

hmm, should re-read i think 

Sorry al, I missed the sarcasm  .

[tony_montana]

this site needs a sarcasm emoticon

[Phil Mrakov]

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2014-05-06/deledio-to-challenge-at-tribunal

[Phil Mrakov]

Reckon they'll give him 2 now

[1965]

Reckon they'll give him 2 now

Don't think they can.

 

[Phil Mrakov]

Reckon they'll give him 2 now

Don't think they can.

 

I think they can

[1965]

Brett Deledio, Richmond, has been charged with a Level Three Striking Offence (225 demerit points, two-match sanction) for striking Matthew Stokes, Geelong Cats, during the second quarter of the Round Seven match between Richmond and the Geelong Cats, played at the MCG on Sunday May 4, 2014.
 
In summary, due to a six-year good record, his two-match sanction can be reduced to a one-game penalty with an early plea.
 
Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Geelong Cats Football Club, the incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three Offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing six-year good record, reducing the penalty by 25 per cent 168.75 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 126.56 demerit points and a one-match sanction.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-05-05/mrp-full-statement-round-seven

[tigs2011]

Reckon they'll give him 2 now

Don't think they can.

 

they can if they decide the impact is worse than it was judged. Doubt it though.

[dwaino]

Reckon they'll give him 2 now

Don't think they can.

 

they can if they decide the impact is worse than it was judged. Doubt it though.

Inb4 upgraded to intentional high attempted murder.

[Chuck17]

Reckon they'll give him 2 now

Don't think they can.

 

they can if they decide the impact is worse than it was judged. Doubt it though.

Inb4 upgraded to intentional high attempted murder.