Who do we need and want, with our salary cap room?

[The Big Richo]

Watts would be on reasonable coin as well, Melbourne has to pay 92% of the cap to someone.

[Judge Roughneck]

U won't get nothing for chaplin
That's the kicker. Not worth a box of potatoes

[The Big Richo]

Worth plenty as a key defender to us.

When he plays well so do we.

[Judge Roughneck]

Pls.



Surprised rance hasn't done a back from carting him

[tigs2011]

Chaplin has been pretty good lately. Show some respect to the great man. Coach is turning in his bloody grave right now. 

[Yeahright]

One could argue Grigg is not in the top30, watts is a large Chaplin upgrade(equally soft,younger,upside) and the excess salary cap room would lead to a beneficial situation. What a cunning plan

Think Grigg would comfortably be in top 30. Watt's isn't an upgrade on Chaplin IMO and we don't have the luxury of trading an okay backman for a speculative one with too many mental demons. I would take the chance on him but not at high risk.

[yellowandback]

One could argue Grigg is not in the top30, watts is a large Chaplin upgrade(equally soft,younger,upside) and the excess salary cap room would lead to a beneficial situation. What a cunning plan

Watts is the Ritchie Tambling of the Demons.
Roos is just trying to talk him up ahead of a trade.

[Chuck17]

One could argue Grigg is not in the top30, watts is a large Chaplin upgrade(equally soft,younger,upside) and the excess salary cap room would lead to a beneficial situation. What a cunning plan

Watts is the Ritchie Tambling of the Demons.
Roos is just trying to talk him up ahead of a trade.

Amen

No more girls at the RFC please

[Judge Roughneck]

watts v richmond:  Round 9   17th May   Richmond   Win 91-74   13   6   19   11   3   0   4   0   1   4   0   0   118   127

i guess chaplin was playing on him

under my submission youd be losing two girls, gaining more. a overall result of minus one girl

[dwaino]

[Willy]

watts v richmond:  Round 9   17th May   Richmond   Win 91-74   13   6   19   11   3   0   4   0   1   4   0   0   118   127

i guess chaplin was playing on him

under my submission youd be losing two girls, gaining more. a overall result of minus one girl

Not surprising that his best game for the year was against us when we were playing like poo, Chaplain included. In general, he has done nothing this year but take up space.
look elsewhere Judge.

[Chuck17]

watts v richmond:  Round 9   17th May   Richmond   Win 91-74   13   6   19   11   3   0   4   0   1   4   0   0   118   127

i guess chaplin was playing on him

under my submission youd be losing two girls, gaining more. a overall result of minus one girl

Not surprising that his best game for the year was against us when we were playing like poo, Chaplain included. In general, he has done nothing this year but take up space.
look elsewhere Judge.

We are reknowned for letting duds and newbies opposition players either played back into form or have a break out game

[the claw]

Ya but older and expensive

lol your worrying about expense yet want to cut chaplin.
you do realise hes contracted until the end of 2016.  if we pay him out you wont be able to afford a rookie yet alone jack watts. whats chaplin on 350 - 400k a yr thats 800k straight onto our cap.
get used to the idea we wont be cutting chaplin  so how about some realistic ideas based on whos contracted and whos not.

[Judge Roughneck]

Surely if you trade the potato you don't continue paying 100% of his salary / Or have it in the cap

[Chuck17]

no one would take him