RFC Membership 2015: Strong and Bold

[Phil Mrakov]

What are you hearing bo ?

[bojangles17]

bj is it true that you were a Carlton supporter as a kid or is that a false rumour?

before RFC there was nothing, 1974 and still going strong, 33 year member this year. why do you ask such a wacko question, is that a lame attempt to discredit 

your answer says a lot 

What is does say is I wasnt a member from 5yo to 13yo ,

[Phil Mrakov]

Whats the latest on the grapevine

[bojangles17]

I haven't heard much lately pm, I need to speak to guy at work who is in players circles , will find out soon

[one-eyed]

As of 11/03/2015

64,019

[one-eyed]

We're now 6,000 ahead of this time last year. This would give a final target of 72k.

11/03/2015   64,019
11/02/2014   58,073

[one-eyed]

Snip! Leave out the personal stuff and stick to the thread topics ppl! 

[WA Tiger]

Cant really grumble at that total, looking back over the years we have really picked up our memberships. Lets hope we can reflect that on field.

[WilliamPowell]

Snip again

If you have complaints then contact us directly rather venting on the forum

No More, I've answered your PM. Suggest you read it

More importantly I recommend EVERYONE have a read of this again

http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/index.php?topic=17325.msg482852#msg482852

Let me make it clear for the final time

That constant trolling, baiting and abusing of other posters will not tolerated.

And just so people are clear - constant trolling also includes over the top negativity just for the sake of it, continual & childish homophobic comments etc that hijack threads.

I am not interested in who started it, the finger pointing etc we've said so many times - debate the topic without the insults, abuse and baiting

Can we make it any clearer?

[tony_montana]

please elaborate

[WilliamPowell]

please elaborate

there is nothing to elaborate on

Just requesting everyone stick to the topics without the baiting, insults etc that have over the last few months gotten out of hand

PS: I've edited an earlier post of mine that had inappropriate content in it - apologies

[The Big Richo]

Should just be a one game membership full stop, without forcing people to donate to a charity they may not wish to.

I like the idea, if you live hours from anywhere the side plays one game could easily be all you can make.

no ones forcing anybody, rather than scunge a membership privilege on the back of a one game option, perhaps just buy a GA ticket 

Lots of people who can't go to games would still like to be a member of the club, not just buy a general admission ticket.

In buying a one game ticket they are forced to donate to the charity the club has chosen.

I'm not saying the charity isn't a fine one, I just object to having the choice to support removed when you wish to buy a footy membership.

[tony_montana]

please elaborate

there is nothing to elaborate on

Just requesting everyone stick to the topics without the baiting, insults etc that have over the last few months gotten out of hand

PS: I've edited an earlier post of mine that had inappropriate content in it - apologies

 


 

[bojangles17]

Should just be a one game membership full stop, without forcing people to donate to a charity they may not wish to.

I like the idea, if you live hours from anywhere the side plays one game could easily be all you can make.

no ones forcing anybody, rather than scunge a membership privilege on the back of a one game option, perhaps just buy a GA ticket 

Lots of people who can't go to games would still like to be a member of the club, not just buy a general admission ticket.

In buying a one game ticket they are forced to donate to the charity the club has chosen.

I'm not saying the charity isn't a fine one, I just object to having the choice to support removed when you wish to buy a footy membership.

I do accept that Richo , perhaps attaching the privilege of a membership to the charity option is wrong and it should be marketed differently. Tbh I don't support a 1 game membership, 3 is. bare minimum , a one gamer should be thrown into an interstate supporter pack seeing they only get to go once a year

[WilliamPowell]

I do accept that Richo , perhaps attaching the privilege of a membership to the charity option is wrong and it should be marketed differently. Tbh I don't support a 1 game membership, 3 is. bare minimum , a one gamer should be thrown into an interstate supporter pack seeing they only get to go once a year

Sorry BJ I can't agree the club has to offer something to people who genuinely cannot get to games. A one game membership does that.

In a perfect world they should just offer something with no match day entry attached but if this is the only way Clubs can get the nuffers at AFL HQ to recognise these type of memberships then that's what they have to do. Just like in a perfect world perhaps the club shouldn't be linking it their preferred charity partner as TBR has mentioned.

I am just happy they are offering something, it may not be perfect but it is a darn sight better than a 3 gamer that is useless to a lot of people who want to members but can't get to games or alternatively can't afford $80 or whatever the 3 gamer costs now