lol at this.
it makes me wonder at just how many we will turn over.
my money is on close to the bare minimum requirement of 3 or 4 from the list proper and one or two rookies with thomas and miles being promoted to the list proper.
Its scary to think that they will only use 3 nd picks.
im not sure about the club. but i would say most thinking supporters all agree we have a middling list and there is much building still required.
we all know they will only cut UNCONTRACTED PLAYERS. So whos in the gun, which 4 or 5 are the most likely to go.
uncontracted players are.
Arnot, Astbury,Batchelor,Dea, A Edwards, Elton, Griffiths, Helbig, Knights, Mcbean, Mcdonough, Mcintosh, O'Hanlon, Petterd.
Going by what has transpired this yr and attempting to judge what their thinking may be from their actions and words id say the following are safe.
Astbury - im not sure if he hasnt already been signed.
Batchelor - they talk him up,
Elton - i think his age size and position will see him safe. not many clubs cut junior kpps after such a short time on lists.
Griffiths - has probably done just enough to be kept.
Mcbean - see elton
Mcdonough - another junior will be given time.
Mcintosh - junior whos had lots of injury they will give him every opportunity when fit.
Petterd - hes a hardwick favorite in fairness has probably done enough to be retained in front of many others.
so it leaves imo 6 players in the gun
Arnot, Dea, A Edwards, Helbig, knights, OHanlon, with king already retired.
if we do promote both miles and thomas, well miles has already signed a contract. and we use 4 nd picks, gotta use 4 at least imo, after taking just one junior player last yr any way heres hoping its a minimum of 4. but the club in its delusion probably wont see it this way.
5 of Arnot, Dea, A Edwards, Helbig, Knights, and O'Hanlon imo are most in the gun.
to take it to its theoretical conclusion those going would be
Arnot, A Edwards, Helbig, Knights, Ohanlon. with King already retired thus allowing for 4 nd picks and two rookie promotions in Miles and Thomas.
Critique and analysis are bedfellows, and even the clubs training, recruiting, list management, gameplan and playing standards should not be immune from review internally & externally.
How is improvement demanded if there are so many back slappers satisfied with mediocrity ?
Just can't see how Newman's current performance standard is satisfactory when this needs to improve next year to make & win finals whilst building towards a premiership.
here here well said. wasting your time voicing around here though.