Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
west coast win
Quote from: Rampstar on October 13, 2014, 02:00:44 PMwest coast winI reckon Melbourne wins.
Quote from: Dice on October 13, 2014, 02:15:48 PMQuote from: Rampstar on October 13, 2014, 02:00:44 PMwest coast winI reckon Melbourne wins.everyone wins except us lol
Quote from: Judge Roughneck on October 13, 2014, 01:45:26 PMniceSorry, I mucked up the 'outs'. We of course give up Conca & pick 12.The proposed trade would be:Richmond - gains pick 11 & Trengove for Conca & pick 12.Melbourne - gains pick 12 for Trengove and pick 23.West Coast - gains Conca & pick 23 for pick 11
nice
The critical question is whether Trengrove would be a better player for us than the player we would have drafted at pick 12. There are question marks over Trengrove's leg speed and his ability to win contested possession. Believe the risks in recruiting him outweigh the advantages.
Quote from: one-eyed on October 13, 2014, 01:59:23 PMQuote from: Judge Roughneck on October 13, 2014, 01:45:26 PMniceSorry, I mucked up the 'outs'. We of course give up Conca & pick 12.The proposed trade would be:Richmond - gains pick 11 & Trengove for Conca & pick 12.Melbourne - gains pick 12 for Trengove and pick 23.West Coast - gains Conca & pick 23 for pick 11Just to be clear, in this scenario we end up with pick 11? Trengove and no conca. all our other picks remain?
Quote from: MintOnLamb on October 13, 2014, 02:25:51 PMQuote from: one-eyed on October 13, 2014, 01:59:23 PMQuote from: Judge Roughneck on October 13, 2014, 01:45:26 PMniceSorry, I mucked up the 'outs'. We of course give up Conca & pick 12.The proposed trade would be:Richmond - gains pick 11 & Trengove for Conca & pick 12.Thanks for that. Yep IF he stays fit. I am sure Roosys team are doing all this for a very good reason. But Fit Trengove> Fit Conca, 11>12Melbourne - gains pick 12 for Trengove and pick 23.West Coast - gains Conca & pick 23 for pick 11Just to be clear, in this scenario we end up with pick 11? Trengove and no conca. all our other picks remain?Yep, we lose Conca, gain Trengove and move our first pick up from 12 to 11.A definite win IF Trengove stays fit.
Quote from: one-eyed on October 13, 2014, 01:59:23 PMQuote from: Judge Roughneck on October 13, 2014, 01:45:26 PMniceSorry, I mucked up the 'outs'. We of course give up Conca & pick 12.The proposed trade would be:Richmond - gains pick 11 & Trengove for Conca & pick 12.Thanks for that. Yep IF he stays fit. I am sure Roosys team are doing all this for a very good reason. But Fit Trengove> Fit Conca, 11>12Melbourne - gains pick 12 for Trengove and pick 23.West Coast - gains Conca & pick 23 for pick 11Just to be clear, in this scenario we end up with pick 11? Trengove and no conca. all our other picks remain?
Quote from: Judge Roughneck on October 13, 2014, 01:45:26 PMniceSorry, I mucked up the 'outs'. We of course give up Conca & pick 12.The proposed trade would be:Richmond - gains pick 11 & Trengove for Conca & pick 12.Thanks for that. Yep IF he stays fit. I am sure Roosys team are doing all this for a very good reason. But Fit Trengove> Fit Conca, 11>12Melbourne - gains pick 12 for Trengove and pick 23.West Coast - gains Conca & pick 23 for pick 11
Quote from: eliminator on October 13, 2014, 01:30:14 PMThe critical question is whether Trengrove would be a better player for us than the player we would have drafted at pick 12. There are question marks over Trengrove's leg speed and his ability to win contested possession. Believe the risks in recruiting him outweigh the advantages.No, if that initial deal were to eventuate, the question would be whether Trengove AND pick 23 would be collectively more influential for the club than pick 12. Trengove alone for pick 12 is not the alleged deal and it would not be a good one for us.
With the greatest of respect there are degrees of risk. Of course all drafting and trading carries a risk. It is about minimizing the risk to an acceptable level. What I am saying is that in my opinion drafting Trengrove carries too much risk. The remark about speculation referred to the terms of any deal not in relation to chasing Trengrove.
I approve of this 3 way trade.We effectively trade Conca for Trengove and a pick upgrade.
FJ is the only one that makes sense.
Quote from: Andyy on October 13, 2014, 04:18:11 PMI approve of this 3 way trade.We effectively trade Conca for Trengove and a pick upgrade.Agree but would still like us to try and find at least another pick in the 20's from somewhere.
