Author Topic: Nathan Drummond [merged]  (Read 33314 times)

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #75 on: March 03, 2015, 08:12:10 PM »
so how did people rate his first outing.people are quite on him. are people shying away from commenting because he had a bad game.
me i was disappointed. i thought being big bodied and a 20yr old plus his pace and supposed defensive ability he would be some sort of chance to get a game. possibly as a fwd or even defensive fwd.
cant see it in the near future though atm he looked  miles away from the level.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40271
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #76 on: March 03, 2015, 08:50:13 PM »
Thought he struggled with the pace of the game; a lot like Menadue did

But that's to be expected with some kids. Some blokes pick up the tempo quickly, others take a few hit outs

That's what I liked about Castagna & Short, they both seemed to pick up the speed of the game very quickly. Perhaps helped by the fact they are both rookies and were on hiding to nothing in a way

Butler too picked up the tempo quickly

Unfortunately Drummond & Menadue didn't
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #77 on: March 03, 2015, 08:54:44 PM »
I'd like to see him given a few more chances before I say he was a wasted pick......
The guy looked nervous as. If he gets his head right he may surprise.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13303
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #78 on: March 03, 2015, 09:01:20 PM »
I was hoping he would take a hanger whilst using Minsons boof head as a launch pad and whilst in the air coming down could kick a soccor bicycle kick goal

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40271
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #79 on: March 03, 2015, 10:06:20 PM »
I'd like to see him given a few more chances before I say he was a wasted pick......
The guy looked nervous as. If he gets his head right he may surprise.

I'm not saying he is wasted pick. Far too early to make that call on him or any of he newbies

Agree he did look nervous. Ditto Menadue
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #80 on: March 03, 2015, 10:08:27 PM »
Hard to critique a juniors first outing, I havent bothered, rather put the likes of Gordon, mcdonagh et al under the blow torch , they need to fire
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #81 on: March 03, 2015, 10:10:57 PM »
Hard to critique a juniors first outing, I havent bothered, rather put the likes of Gordon, mcdonagh et al under the blow torch , they need to fire

Good call.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #82 on: March 04, 2015, 11:07:32 AM »
I'd like to see him given a few more chances before I say he was a wasted pick......
The guy looked nervous as. If he gets his head right he may surprise.

I'm not saying he is wasted pick. Far too early to make that call on him or any of he newbies

Agree he did look nervous. Ditto Menadue
Just preempting the OER reaction WP........ :rollin
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #83 on: March 04, 2015, 11:09:58 AM »
so how did people rate his first outing.people are quite on him. are people shying away from commenting because he had a bad game.
me i was disappointed. i thought being big bodied and a 20yr old plus his pace and supposed defensive ability he would be some sort of chance to get a game. possibly as a fwd or even defensive fwd.
cant see it in the near future though atm he looked  miles away from the level.

poor game, but first hitout so not going to label him based on it. Would like to see him have a few more hitouts. Hardly think people are shying away from commenting bc it was a poor performances

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Pick 52. Nathan Drummond
« Reply #84 on: March 04, 2015, 06:40:24 PM »
I'd like to see him given a few more chances before I say he was a wasted pick......
The guy looked nervous as. If he gets his head right he may surprise.

I'm not saying he is wasted pick. Far too early to make that call on him or any of he newbies

Agree he did look nervous. Ditto Menadue
Just preempting the OvER reaction WP........ :rollin
EFA
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98047
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Nathan Drummond to debut (RFC)
« Reply #85 on: April 23, 2015, 06:32:36 PM »
Best of luck to the Drummo tomorrow night  :thumbsup.


Drummond to debut

richmondfc.com.au 
April 23, 2015 6:25 PM


Richmond’s third pick (No. 52 overall) in the 2014 National Draft, Nathan Drummond, will make his AFL debut with the Tigers in Friday night’s big Anzac Day eve match against Melbourne at the MCG.

Drummond, 20, won the best and fairest at TAC Cup team the Murray Bushrangers last year and also played three VFL games for Richmond in 2014.

He was a standout performer at the AFL’s Draft Combine at the end of last year, ranking top five in the 3km time trial, beep test, clean hands, repeat spring tests, kicking and goalkicking categories.

“’Drummo’ comes off some good form in the VFL,” said Richmond assistant coach Brendon Lade.

“He could play half-back, half-forward, and a bit of on-ball for us.

“We’re excited about what he can do.  He’s lightning quick, can run all day and normally uses the ball pretty well.

“We look forward to his run on Friday night.”

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/2015-04-23/round-4-team-drummond-to-debut

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Nathan Drummond [merged]
« Reply #86 on: April 23, 2015, 07:05:09 PM »
Has done nothing to earn a callup
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Nathan Drummond [merged]
« Reply #87 on: April 23, 2015, 07:05:34 PM »
Track watchers have been racving about this kid , can't wait to  see the next fj black book special  :clapping
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Nathan Drummond [merged]
« Reply #88 on: April 23, 2015, 07:11:44 PM »
Track watchers have been racving about this kid , can't wait to  see the next fj black book special  :clapping

Racv-ing? Is the word he's gonna break down ?

Why would we even name an unfit player  :huh
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Nathan Drummond [merged]
« Reply #89 on: April 23, 2015, 07:38:20 PM »
Has done nothing to earn a callup

See him play at all ?, silly question obviously not ,if you had you would not HAVE made that comment