« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Changes for the Port game?  (Read 4551 times)

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #15 on: May 18, 2015, 02:14:15 AM »
Quote from: big tone on May 17, 2015, 11:42:19 PM
IMO Batchelor is the worst player I have seen in a Tigers jumper for 5 years. He gives nothing to our side. He is hard at he footy that I love but he is below AFL standard on every other skill that can be measured. We play one short with him in our back line. I hope Dimma realizes that sooner rather than later but I bet he will not be in the side at years end.

I agree -  I used to think Batchelor was serviceable - but he just has no class and is a real liability at times. A momentum killer. He and Morris are the two players that make my eyes bleed.
Dea has a bit of flare about him - give him a go..
Logged
Unleash the tornado

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8117
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #16 on: May 18, 2015, 06:22:39 AM »
McDonuts looks like an option as small forward. Give him a crack
Logged
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3812
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #17 on: May 18, 2015, 07:04:19 AM »
Brenton Ellis, Hunt and Morris should be dropped after that game but won't be. Would rest Maric and bring in Griffiths. Griffiths and Vickery to share ruck duties. Leave McBean up forward. Consider bringing in McDonough and Conca.
Logged

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #18 on: May 18, 2015, 07:16:21 AM »
Correct me if i am wrong but wasn't McDonough a small forward as a junior? We try to turn players into something they are not, we don't have a specialist small forward so why not give him the opportunity.
Logged

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #19 on: May 18, 2015, 08:18:25 AM »
Quote from: Lozza on May 18, 2015, 07:16:21 AM
Correct me if i am wrong but wasn't McDonough a small forward as a junior? We try to turn players into something they are not, we don't have a specialist small forward so why not give him the opportunity.

 :clapping
Logged
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40361
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #20 on: May 18, 2015, 01:49:40 PM »
INS: Edwards, Griffiths

OUTS: Menadue, McBean
Logged
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5648
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #21 on: May 18, 2015, 01:51:30 PM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on May 18, 2015, 01:49:40 PM
INS: Edwards, Griffiths

OUTS: Menadue, McBean

Sounds good to me.

 :thumbsup
Logged
Quote from: Diocletian on June 08, 2024, 04:00:35 PM
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19456
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #22 on: May 18, 2015, 02:18:25 PM »
Ins: More kids.

Outs: More old hacks.
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3750
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #23 on: May 18, 2015, 02:34:40 PM »
I seem to recall Port were way quicker than us last year and on the rebound we had no chance. I am a fraction hazy on how Menadue
went yesterday, did he have any chances to use his speed, would he be effective as a go to breakout plyer one up from kick ins?, Is Arnott able to get in the mix??
Agree that I would love to see McBean stay in I think he is a great foil for Jack, I know he didn't kick a goal BUT the opposition can't afford to leave him unmanned. I particularly liked the spread of him and Jack not falling over each other.

Was that planned? if not it should have been.

I would like to see Corey Ellis stay in as well.

Overall I think the team responded well to the changes on Sunday. It sent a clear message and gave our youngsters experience and opportunity.
Logged

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #24 on: May 18, 2015, 03:29:58 PM »
Batchlor needs his head chopped off. A stint back in the Reserves. Not fit enough & that makes him turn the ball over. Unless he is carrying some sort of injury or had touch of the flu yesterday, He made some horrible mistakes.

WP we need a emoticon of a axe chopping a chooks head off
Logged

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #25 on: May 18, 2015, 03:32:07 PM »
Batch is crap, simple, same as his brother Morris.
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline JP Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1568
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #26 on: May 18, 2015, 04:31:28 PM »
No change!  Although I would like Griffiths back in, but not at the expense of McBean.  The Jack & the Beanstalk forward set up will work a treat for us, just be patient with the Bean, he will be worth it.  Menadue will be needed for the foot speed.  Vickery stays too, some of his ruck work was excellent, Elton had some average moments ... just wondering if Griff could play CHB/third tall defender?  Batch wasn't brilliant either ...   ::)
Logged
Once a Tiger, always a Tiger!  Loud, proud & dangerous!

Offline Heart of Darkness

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 467
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #27 on: May 18, 2015, 05:29:45 PM »
Quote from: JP Tiger on May 18, 2015, 04:31:28 PM
No change!  Although I would like Griffiths back in, but not at the expense of McBean.  The Jack & the Beanstalk forward set up will work a treat for us, just be patient with the Bean, he will be worth it.  Menadue will be needed for the foot speed.  Vickery stays too, some of his ruck work was excellent, Elton had some average moments ... just wondering if Griff could play CHB/third tall defender?  Batch wasn't brilliant either ...   ::)

Don't really ever want to see Griff playing back again. Reacts too slowly down there. Think at this point Griff, Vickery and McBean are competing for 2 spots. McBean being unable to give Maric a chop out in the ruck means he starts behind.
Logged

Online lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2877
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #28 on: May 18, 2015, 05:43:15 PM »
This is a hard one for me.

If fit Sheds has to definitely come in. In an ideal world he would come in for Morris. But It wouldn't be bad if he came in for Batchelor instead
Logged

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19456
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #29 on: May 18, 2015, 06:26:09 PM »
Leave McBean in - Vickery & Griffiths can fight it out for the third spot. Loser gets traded.

Quote from: lamington on May 18, 2015, 05:43:15 PM
This is a hard one for me.

If fit Sheds has to definitely come in. In an ideal world he would come in for Morris. But It wouldn't be bad if he came in for Batchelor instead

Edwards in for Batchelor with Morris back to defence would be the logical option. Unfortunately there's no place for logic at Damien Hardwick's Richmond.
Logged
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

Quote from: 1965 on November 17, 2023, 06:47:06 PM

FJ is the only one that makes sense.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »