Author Topic: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or Key Back / #RookieDraft  (Read 24108 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #30 on: October 09, 2015, 10:34:58 PM »
 :facepalm :facepalm :facepalm

Oh now listen to the back peddling crap...it's embarrassing...

RFC stay out of the press you sound like a bunch of stuffing losers :gotigers
« Last Edit: October 10, 2015, 09:21:19 AM by WA Tiger »
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #31 on: October 10, 2015, 06:10:02 AM »
:facepalm :facepalm :facepalm

Oh now listen to the back peddling crap...it's embarrassing...

RFC stay out of the press you sound like a bunch of stuffing loosers :gotigers

It's losers

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #32 on: October 10, 2015, 09:20:18 AM »
:facepalm :facepalm :facepalm

Oh now listen to the back peddling crap...it's embarrassing...

RFC stay out of the press you sound like a bunch of stuffing loosers :gotigers

Couldn't agree more.

Stuffing Amatuers who have each others backs to protect jobs.

The incompetence and lack of accountability is just stunning
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #33 on: October 10, 2015, 11:22:01 AM »
we brought Shaun in a couple of years ago to be that taller option. He’s had some injury and (issues with) durability, but he’s also showed signs here of improving. We need to back that in.”



 :o
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #34 on: October 10, 2015, 11:27:32 AM »
Stuff me
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9982
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #35 on: October 10, 2015, 11:55:29 AM »
There ya go matey. Confirmation we aren't looking at rucks and KPP's. Only an inside mid and a rebounding HBF.


Personally I'd be chasing all of these positions. Yarran HBF, Townsend InMid, Smith ruck, Tomlinson KPP.


Crazy that DR thinks we can just go and address the ruck issue in 12-18 months. Hampson and Maric will probably both be truly finishing in 12-18 months. Not to mention we can't get a new ruckman in '18 months' during the season...


Why aren't we looking at:

Bugg
Townsend
Redden

Carlisle
Henderson
Tomlinson
Talia

Leuenberger
Redden
Smith

Honestly I'd even go so far as to throw the whole kitchen at Hogan. Tell him $1million/year for 8 years or something stupid.

How do you know we arent

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #36 on: October 10, 2015, 12:53:06 PM »
we brought Shaun in a couple of years ago to be that taller option. He’s had some injury and (issues with) durability, but he’s also showed signs here of improving. We need to back that in.”



 :o

 :xmassign
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #37 on: October 15, 2015, 12:08:37 PM »
we wants needles

someone has a clue  :cheers :cheers
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline tdy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #38 on: October 15, 2015, 05:32:11 PM »
I really hope Soldo comes on quick or we're stuffed in the ruck if Maric goes down. Is Soldo even on the list proper? How many VFL games has he played?

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #39 on: October 15, 2015, 06:07:58 PM »
I really hope Soldo comes on quick or we're stuffed in the ruck if Maric goes down. Is Soldo even on the list proper? How many VFL games has he played?
You forgot our secret weapon, Hampson. :shh
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40319
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #40 on: October 15, 2015, 08:45:18 PM »
I was pondering while I was sitting in traffic trying to get home but going nowhere

Now the Bombers have Luenenberger Should we consider Jon Giles ex Giant who Bombers bought in this season, that Hird wouldn't play?

He was a reasonable ruckman for the Giants. Even remember a few on here suggesting we should go after him a few years back

Would be a significant upgrade on Hampson as he can actually take a mark around the ground more than once a game
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #41 on: October 15, 2015, 08:47:36 PM »
Didn't Hammer take 2 against Carlton? :shh
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9982
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #42 on: October 15, 2015, 10:55:42 PM »
I was pondering while I was sitting in traffic trying to get home but going nowhere

Now the Bombers have Luenenberger Should we consider Jon Giles ex Giant who Bombers bought in this season, that Hird wouldn't play?

He was a reasonable ruckman for the Giants. Even remember a few on here suggesting we should go after him a few years back

Would be a significant upgrade on Hampson as he can actually take a mark around the ground more than once a game

Careful mate, I suggested this and got slammed for it.

Personally I think he's a worthy backup.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40319
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #43 on: October 16, 2015, 06:59:32 AM »

Careful mate, I suggested this and got slammed for it.

Personally I think he's a worthy backup.

Sorry I must have missed that

I would have backed you, reckon as a back up he'd be OK.

He's been treated abysmally by the Bombers. You'd get him for a 4th rounder I reckon
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Is the reason, we are apparently not in for a ruck or key defender
« Reply #44 on: October 16, 2015, 08:13:16 AM »
Didn't Hammer take 2 against Carlton? :shh
Marks against Carlton are not to be used as evidence.