Author Topic: Changes for the Port game?  (Read 12098 times)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #45 on: April 25, 2016, 07:22:40 PM »
there's a lot of angst in that post that starts off loling at all the angst
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #46 on: April 25, 2016, 07:24:51 PM »
Cumming from u mate lol
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #47 on: April 25, 2016, 07:27:15 PM »
all over ya, babe.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4259
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #48 on: April 25, 2016, 08:44:31 PM »
there's a lot of angst in that post that starts off loling at all the angst
Lol no angst here just pointing out what should be obvious to all of us.Shame you cant see it.

Typical isnt it. your not here to debate this topic or most topics for that matter, yet  you still feel compelled to interject endlessly with nothing but personalised bollocks.
I could turn this into another slanging match but your just not worth taking the time or trouble to do so, my time is far more important than wasting it on an imbecile..
See ya.


Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #49 on: April 25, 2016, 08:52:02 PM »
bye, thanks for your input.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #50 on: April 26, 2016, 04:12:22 AM »
Rance's suspension will keep Chaplin in  :help.

Out: Rance (susp.), Morris
 
In: Grimes, Lids
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Jackstar 1960

  • Guest
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #51 on: April 26, 2016, 07:26:32 AM »
Reckon they will play Hampson next week
Vickery isn't a ruck option when Ivan goes off
Huge problem there

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #52 on: April 26, 2016, 07:37:18 AM »
Reckon they will play Hampson next week
Vickery isn't a ruck option when Ivan goes off
Huge problem there
I reckon they will bring in griff. Solid vfl form is usually enough.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2016, 08:31:59 AM by Go Richo 12 »

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #53 on: April 26, 2016, 08:13:14 AM »
Outs Rance (suspended), Jack (injured), Townsend, Houli, Ellis (Cory) all dropped
Cory needs to find form and confidence in the 2's.
Houli needs a few weeks in the 2's.

I'd give Brandon Ellis, Ty Vickery and Grigg a last chance but make it clear once they are out - it's not a week in the 2's / it's a stint.
I would give Morris the one role he is good at which is the best small forward - people talk about others being crucified by the coach. This bloke can sit on another's tail inside 50 and harass him out of the game. These other roles have confused his football.
I am hoping Lids and Vlas are fit / put them in.
My instincts say McBean and play Ty up the field and hope that both step up  :pray
Then I'd bring back Lennon to play high half forward and Elton to replace Rance.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7359
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #54 on: April 26, 2016, 09:19:00 AM »
The ressies are a bigger joke than the seniors, no one there that really desrves a shot bar Chol!
It will all come down to default and just to finish off all you McBean lovers will be in for a rude shock if he gets a call up.

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #55 on: April 26, 2016, 09:20:25 AM »
The ressies are a bigger joke than the seniors, no one there that really desrves a shot bar Chol!
It will all come down to default and just to finish off all you McBean lovers will be in for a rude shock if he gets a call up.

The crapness of the reserves is deeply upsetting too

After watching Chaplin I doubt McBean can possibly be more Shyte
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #56 on: April 26, 2016, 09:36:41 AM »
there's a lot of angst in that post that starts off loling at all the angst
Lol no angst here just pointing out what should be obvious to all of us.Shame you cant see it.

Typical isnt it. your not here to debate this topic or most topics for that matter, yet  you still feel compelled to interject endlessly with nothing but personalised bollocks.
I could turn this into another slanging match but your just not worth taking the time or trouble to do so, my time is far more important than wasting it on an imbecile..
See ya.

x2
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #57 on: April 26, 2016, 09:38:43 AM »
Rance's suspension will keep Chaplin in  :help.

Out: Rance (susp.), Morris
 
In: Grimes, Lids
I thought Grimes was still a way off returning MT.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #58 on: April 26, 2016, 09:43:57 AM »
Outs Rance (suspended), Jack (injured), Townsend, Houli, Ellis (Cory) all dropped
Cory needs to find form and confidence in the 2's.
Houli needs a few weeks in the 2's.

I'd give Brandon Ellis, Ty Vickery and Grigg a last chance but make it clear once they are out - it's not a week in the 2's / it's a stint.
I would give Morris the one role he is good at which is the best small forward - people talk about others being crucified by the coach. This bloke can sit on another's tail inside 50 and harass him out of the game. These other roles have confused his football.
I am hoping Lids and Vlas are fit / put them in.
My instincts say McBean and play Ty up the field and hope that both step up  :pray
Then I'd bring back Lennon to play high half forward and Elton to replace Rance.

You would give Morris another go...FFs... :facepalm....just..... :facepalm....You wonder why some have a go at you. This is just another example of people accepting the rubbish we have, Morris is finished, the sooner people like you and the club realise it we may actually be able to move forward. But while everyone and the coaching staff still think players like Morris and Batch are of any with them=n we will remain at the bottom.

Also, instead of playing C Ellis on half back where the ball is constantly and we are under so much pressure, why not put him forward or try him in the center or rotating on the wing. No, lets play him where he can get flogged and then drop him...really!!

Drop

B Ellis
Morris
Batchelor
Houli

They are the ones that a clear message needs to be sent to. Morris and Batch should never return if we are serious.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Changes for the Port game?
« Reply #59 on: April 26, 2016, 12:49:42 PM »
The ressies are a bigger joke than the seniors, no one there that really desrves a shot bar Chol!
It will all come down to default and just to finish off all you McBean lovers will be in for a rude shock if he gets a call up.

I agree some are pinning too much hope on him by I reckon it's time to just throw him in the deep end and see how he goes. If he doesn't lift then it's back to the 2's until you do