Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Quote from: eliminator on April 30, 2016, 07:40:23 AMWould be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.Big need for two rucksIt creates a mismatch as they ain't tall down back They will more than likely given Dixon a run in the ruck as same stage
Would be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.
Quote from: Jackstar 1960 on April 30, 2016, 11:15:01 AMQuote from: eliminator on April 30, 2016, 07:40:23 AMWould be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.Big need for two rucksIt creates a mismatch as they ain't tall down back They will more than likely given Dixon a run in the ruck as same stageUm.... Hamspud doesn't work. 2 possessions up till half time. Useless prick. I don't care what anyone says, Hampsud is a potato and shouldn't be playing AFL. A complete joke of the competition to have him. Maric is finished but the brains trust at RFC didn't think we needed a ruckman.
Quote from: Tigeritis™©® on April 30, 2016, 08:44:49 PMQuote from: Jackstar 1960 on April 30, 2016, 11:15:01 AMQuote from: eliminator on April 30, 2016, 07:40:23 AMWould be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.Big need for two rucksIt creates a mismatch as they ain't tall down back They will more than likely given Dixon a run in the ruck as same stageUm.... Hamspud doesn't work. 2 possessions up till half time. Useless prick. I don't care what anyone says, Hampsud is a potato and shouldn't be playing AFL. A complete joke of the competition to have him. Maric is finished but the brains trust at RFC didn't think we needed a ruckman. But what about Hampsons training form?
Quote from: Stalin on April 30, 2016, 06:05:41 PMso mcintosh plays zero football this week?great Is he injured?He would have to be otherwise Dimwit is an idiot.
so mcintosh plays zero football this week?great
Quote from: big tone on April 30, 2016, 06:07:48 PMQuote from: Stalin on April 30, 2016, 06:05:41 PMso mcintosh plays zero football this week?great Is he injured?He would have to be otherwise Dimwit is an idiot. Got told at the IS pre match briefing he had a corkieWould definitely be playing of fit
Have to play 2 ruckmanBeen a huge issue all year that when Vickery goes into the ruck to relieveForward set up is shot Playing two ruckman allow for Vickery to be a permanent forward Happy Days
have to admit, im an advocate of playing two rucks. I did seriously reconsider this after jj sprouted it, but i still think it has merit.The issue is the quality we have . rucks need to ofer something around the ground, and even with two, they still need to at least provide an option up forward.we have a broken one and a dud
Quote from: Penelope on May 01, 2016, 10:48:07 AMhave to admit, im an advocate of playing two rucks. I did seriously reconsider this after jj sprouted it, but i still think it has merit.The issue is the quality we have . rucks need to ofer something around the ground, and even with two, they still need to at least provide an option up forward.we have a broken one and a dudIf Griff had a dip then we wouldn't need the Hampson.We bag Hampson, and rightly so, but Griff not being up to it is the issue.
Quote from: Go Richo 12 on May 01, 2016, 10:57:21 AMQuote from: Penelope on May 01, 2016, 10:48:07 AMhave to admit, im an advocate of playing two rucks. I did seriously reconsider this after jj sprouted it, but i still think it has merit.The issue is the quality we have . rucks need to ofer something around the ground, and even with two, they still need to at least provide an option up forward.we have a broken one and a spacoIf Griff had a dip then we wouldn't need the spacco.We bag Hampson, and rightly so, but Griff not being up to it is the issue.griff was never a viable ruck optionsquare pegs round holesterrible list management
Quote from: Penelope on May 01, 2016, 10:48:07 AMhave to admit, im an advocate of playing two rucks. I did seriously reconsider this after jj sprouted it, but i still think it has merit.The issue is the quality we have . rucks need to ofer something around the ground, and even with two, they still need to at least provide an option up forward.we have a broken one and a spacoIf Griff had a dip then we wouldn't need the spacco.We bag Hampson, and rightly so, but Griff not being up to it is the issue.
have to admit, im an advocate of playing two rucks. I did seriously reconsider this after jj sprouted it, but i still think it has merit.The issue is the quality we have . rucks need to ofer something around the ground, and even with two, they still need to at least provide an option up forward.we have a broken one and a spaco
vickery is a better option than hamspud, not that it says much
