Author Topic: Official team round 6 vs Port  (Read 12685 times)

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13299
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #60 on: April 29, 2016, 03:00:40 PM »
Hopefully its not based on who is tearing up the training paddock

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13299
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #61 on: April 29, 2016, 03:29:22 PM »
Maybe they could have a train off to decide who plays

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #62 on: April 29, 2016, 06:54:22 PM »
Two trains, one tunnel. Who will jump the tracks?
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #63 on: April 30, 2016, 07:40:23 AM »
Would be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13299
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #64 on: April 30, 2016, 08:22:22 AM »
We don't have two rucks, there is Maric and then there is the ninth goal post, 8 posts are enough

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #65 on: April 30, 2016, 10:55:49 AM »
if this side can't beat Port l will want massive changes at Tigerland.

NO EXCUSES

its on our home ground & there are 22 players out there.

NO EXCUSES

NO EXCUSES

NO EXCUSES

NO EXCUSES

l'm over the poo with this club with its insipid performances & basic mistakes.
l'm not attending games till they get their poo together. l'm done wasting hundreds of dollars every week on weak performers  :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead :banghead

Jackstar 1960

  • Guest
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #66 on: April 30, 2016, 11:15:01 AM »
Would be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.

Big need for two rucks
It creates a mismatch as they ain't tall down back
They will more than likely given Dixon a run in the ruck as same stage

Offline Raoul Duke

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
  • Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #67 on: April 30, 2016, 11:53:37 AM »
Big need for two rucks
It creates a mismatch as they ain't tall down back
Exactly why a tall forward should of got a run like McBean,would have been a good in given the circumstance.
Probably better to play Hampson, Chaplin or even Morris in the forward line though.

 :facepalm
The possibility of physical and mental collapse is now very real. No sympathy for the Devil, keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #68 on: April 30, 2016, 12:31:53 PM »
If you play two rucks the problem is that Hampson is not a good resting forward.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #69 on: April 30, 2016, 12:41:39 PM »
Would be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.

Big need for two rucks
It creates a mismatch as they ain't tall down back
They will more than likely given Dixon a run in the ruck as same stage

It only creates a mismatch in theory if both rucks are capable, if not you actually hamstring yourself by going in with one less.

A side containing Maric, hampson, Vickery and Chaplin - Geez H Geez that is SLOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Offline Stalin

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8356
  • Close your mouth pls, we are not a codfish
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #70 on: April 30, 2016, 01:00:35 PM »
If you play two rucks the problem is that Hampson is not a good resting forward.

or good around the ground as a 'ruck'
Then he grabbed two chopsticks and stuck them in his mouth , pretending to be a walrus

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #71 on: April 30, 2016, 01:09:47 PM »
Would be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.

Big need for two rucks
It creates a mismatch as they ain't tall down back
They will more than likely given Dixon a run in the ruck as same stage

It only creates a mismatch in theory if both rucks are capable, if not you actually hamstring yourself by going in with one less.

A side containing Maric, hampson, Vickery and Chaplin - Geez H Geez that is SLOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Exactly. Its all good in theory but if they arent up to scratch the theory means nothing. Just like the whole age profile theory at our club
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #72 on: April 30, 2016, 02:30:50 PM »
If you play two rucks the problem is that Hampson is not a good resting forward.
all the more reason to be able to rest him on the bench
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #73 on: April 30, 2016, 03:07:26 PM »
Would be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.

Big need for two rucks
It creates a mismatch as they ain't tall down back
They will more than likely given Dixon a run in the ruck as same stage

It only creates a mismatch in theory if both rucks are capable, if not you actually hamstring yourself by going in with one less.

A side containing Maric, hampson, Vickery and Chaplin - Geez H Geez that is SLOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Exactly. Its all good in theory but if they arent up to scratch the theory means nothing. Just like the whole age profile theory at our club
That age profile stuff drives me crazy. Sure, more experienced teams generally do better but it seemed that we were recruiting mature age guys just so we could quickly reach the right age profile as a team. The trouble is it ignored the fact that the players recruited were very average footballers and actually did not allow the team to develop together, another hallmark of success.
I thought Hardwick said no more short cuts at Richmond when he got there. He started off well but lost patience very quickly. Sure we were disadvantaged by the expansion teams but instead of taking the long and patient road he opted for the quick fix. The quick fix has ended up destroying the teams glue now we are faced with almost starting over again.
Someone has to pay for this as we are all heading to our graves waiting for a rebuild from the ground up. We need a proper recruiting, list management and development program fast.
FFS, show them all the door at the end of the year. I for one, am fed up with their incompetence.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Official team round 6 vs Port
« Reply #74 on: April 30, 2016, 03:15:24 PM »
Would be good if they played Lids in the forwardline and dropped Hampson. No need for two rucks against Port.

Big need for two rucks
It creates a mismatch as they ain't tall down back
They will more than likely given Dixon a run in the ruck as same stage

It only creates a mismatch in theory if both rucks are capable, if not you actually hamstring yourself by going in with one less.

A side containing Maric, hampson, Vickery and Chaplin - Geez H Geez that is SLOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Exactly. Its all good in theory but if they arent up to scratch the theory means nothing. Just like the whole age profile theory at our club
That age profile stuff drives me crazy. Sure, more experienced teams generally do better but it seemed that we were recruiting mature age guys just so we could quickly reach the right age profile as a team. The trouble is it ignored the fact that the players recruited were very average footballers and actually did not allow the team to develop together, another hallmark of success.
I thought Hardwick said no more short cuts at Richmond when he got there. He started off well but lost patience very quickly. Sure we were disadvantaged by the expansion teams but instead of taking the long and patient road he opted for the quick fix. The quick fix has ended up destroying the teams glue now we are faced with almost starting over again.
Someone has to pay for this as we are all heading to our graves waiting for a rebuild from the ground up. We need a proper recruiting, list management and development program fast.
FFS, show them all the door at the end of the year. I for one, am fed up with their incompetence.

100% spot on
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018