Author Topic: Toby Nankervis [merged]  (Read 230805 times)

Offline Pappy

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #585 on: October 03, 2020, 11:49:45 AM »
Thought he was poor to be honest.
The handball turnover that resulted in a goal was a momentum killer.
He always seems slow to get rid of the ball hence why he gets tackled and the Lions exposed this.
He’s a great player but just calling it as I see it.

Online JP Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1562
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #586 on: October 03, 2020, 12:04:12 PM »
I don't expect him to win the centre taps, never have

But at stoppages I felt for him constantly getting grabbed, having his arms locked and no frees.

Sorry, 1 free for that all night
Glad you noticed the holding in the ruck (after I pointed it out).  Its not often that I go for a conspiracy theory but I really feel we were just not supposed to win, the 'hair trigger' umpiring was just a part of it.  We got pinged for everything while Brisbane seemed to be immune to the same decisions. 
The goal review in the last quarter with the worst footage since the moon landing (the moon landing footage from the 60's  was considerably better than the ARC footage from last night) was actually laughable!  Vlaustuin was adamant that he touched it off the boot but the only footage put up for review was taken from the far end of the ground!  Was that really the only footage?  Really?  Of course the blurry blobs from 150mtrs away weren't enough to overturn the decision ... game over ....
I could've shot better footage from 200mtrs away with a Super8 camera with my scarf wrapped around the lens!  Inconclusive?  Try 'outrageously incompetent'!  Try 'rigged'!     
Once a Tiger, always a Tiger!  Loud, proud & dangerous!

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #587 on: October 03, 2020, 02:14:01 PM »
I don't expect him to win the centre taps, never have

But at stoppages I felt for him constantly getting grabbed, having his arms locked and no frees.

Sorry, 1 free for that all night
Glad you noticed the holding in the ruck (after I pointed it out).  Its not often that I go for a conspiracy theory but I really feel we were just not supposed to win, the 'hair trigger' umpiring was just a part of it.  We got pinged for everything while Brisbane seemed to be immune to the same decisions. 
The goal review in the last quarter with the worst footage since the moon landing (the moon landing footage from the 60's  was considerably better than the ARC footage from last night) was actually laughable!  Vlaustuin was adamant that he touched it off the boot but the only footage put up for review was taken from the far end of the ground!  Was that really the only footage?  Really?  Of course the blurry blobs from 150mtrs away weren't enough to overturn the decision ... game over ....
I could've shot better footage from 200mtrs away with a Super8 camera with my scarf wrapped around the lens!  Inconclusive?  Try 'outrageously incompete

nt'!  Try 'rigged'!     

So tell me no explanation from afl on that review in final quarter pathectic ?.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98235
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #588 on: October 10, 2020, 05:11:12 AM »
Toby Nankervis

When St Kilda had somewhat of a sniff at three-quarter time, the premiership Tiger put his hand up to win the battle in the centre, winning multiple huge clearances to ensure his club would head to South Australia with momentum .

Rating: 7

Source: Foxsports

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #589 on: October 10, 2020, 10:32:16 AM »
Nank was huge last night I thought.

His best game in ages.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #590 on: October 10, 2020, 10:39:49 AM »
Do we leave him combat Ladhams and Lycett by himself big ask.

Offline The Machine

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3697
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #591 on: October 10, 2020, 10:49:42 AM »
Played a great game! personally, i liked the backup support offered by Astbury and at time Balta.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #592 on: October 10, 2020, 01:41:01 PM »
He's intercept marking is massively underrated but he 'll need far more support in the ruck v Adelwood... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #593 on: October 10, 2020, 02:17:35 PM »
was close to BOG for me

stood up
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9973
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #594 on: October 10, 2020, 02:29:08 PM »
Do we leave him combat Ladhams and Lycett by himself big ask.

Playing Chol would be leaving Nank by himself anyway.

Use broad in the backline, play Balta ruck.

Online JP Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1562
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #595 on: October 10, 2020, 02:44:02 PM »
Nank was great all game, but his last quarter reeked of leadership!  He just refused to be beaten & showed the way for the rest.  Close enough to BOG for me!     :clapping
Once a Tiger, always a Tiger!  Loud, proud & dangerous!

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #596 on: October 10, 2020, 02:47:40 PM »
Do we leave him combat Ladhams and Lycett by himself big ask.

Playing Chol would be leaving Nank by himself anyway.

Use broad in the backline, play Balta ruck.

Against Brisbane Chol only had 2 less hit outs than Nankervis in less than half the contests....Lynch & Riewoldt both playing also makes a difference.... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40311
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #597 on: October 10, 2020, 03:37:07 PM »
was close to BOG for me

stood up

^^^^^ this  :clapping
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3961
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #598 on: October 10, 2020, 06:24:20 PM »
Do we leave him combat Ladhams and Lycett by himself big ask.

Playing Chol would be leaving Nank by himself anyway.

Use broad in the backline, play Balta ruck.

Tend to agree better serviced with above.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Toby Nankervis [merged]
« Reply #599 on: October 10, 2020, 10:30:32 PM »
The club that keeps giving.