Author Topic: Yarran Cut from list...official  (Read 25537 times)

Offline jezza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #45 on: November 23, 2016, 12:17:22 PM »
Well said Flash.

Where is the accountability for decisions? Given issues with Yarran would have been known prior to the trade, who signed off on taking the risk?

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19973
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #46 on: November 23, 2016, 12:33:57 PM »
Wow, Balm was just saying on SEN that he'll remain on the list for the rest of this season so he actually hasent been delisted as such!
I'm not sure why or how but this now makes the whole thing look like a bigger joke :banghead

Ok...now I'm slightly annoyed....
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

“If women stopped working, everything would be fine. If men stopped working, everyone would die.”

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #47 on: November 23, 2016, 12:53:45 PM »
Quite surprised they didnt keep up the smoke screen until after the board elections. 
Chris can now concentrate on dealing and fixing his issues and thats great.

Now my beef is with this basket case of a club...who is responsible for putting us into this situation?  By responsible I mean, who put forward the idea and who signed off on it, because taking into account
1. 2 year extrension before this year to our coach
2. 2 year extrension then given to Hampson, prior to review which quite clearly pointed to the football dept not being up to par with its desicions
3. The review ending up with most of the football staff hired being marched out

and now this,  I cant understand how there are people at the club still employed in their positions. i.e. Dan Richardson and Blair Hartley to name 2.

I have heard the SEN grab with Balme with Ralph and its pretty concerning that his usual calm self was put to the side today...tipping he didnt know what he signed on for as well...we are in deep poo with this board pulling swifty after swifty

Its crystal cleat that the current CEO and the board he steers, has no idea on how to build a footy team...they might be good at bringing out nice pics of graphs and promoting our standing in the community but when it comes to football they miss the mark by a very very long way
I don't think anyone can argue with that.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #48 on: November 23, 2016, 12:58:01 PM »
Called it before we recruited him. I wanted Dunkley with that pick.
What?

You would have given up two seconds rounders for Dunkley?

I say rubbish!

Because in the end pick 31 would never have got Dunkley.....
Clarify that statement. Are you saying I didn't state that at the time? I always wanted Dunkley with our 2nd rounder. The fact that we improved our draft position to 19 by including a future 2nd round pick in prior negotiations never altered my position.
I'm saying that they only traded for pick 19 to get Yarran. If they wanted Dunkley, they would either have picked him at 12 or hoped he slid to 31. There is no way known they would have done the trade to get 19 for Dunkley. That is reality. What you are saying was never a real option. So what is the purpose of staying something that would never ever have occurred?
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #49 on: November 23, 2016, 01:27:06 PM »
Called it before we recruited him. I wanted Dunkley with that pick.
What?

You would have given up two seconds rounders for Dunkley?

I say rubbish!

Because in the end pick 31 would never have got Dunkley.....
Clarify that statement. Are you saying I didn't state that at the time? I always wanted Dunkley with our 2nd rounder. The fact that we improved our draft position to 19 by including a future 2nd round pick in prior negotiations never altered my position.
I'm saying that they only traded for pick 19 to get Yarran. If they wanted Dunkley, they would either have picked him at 12 or hoped he slid to 31. There is no way known they would have done the trade to get 19 for Dunkley. That is reality. What you are saying was never a real option. So what is the purpose of staying something that would never ever have occurred?
Late in negotiations (after the horse trading to get 19) they still had time to come to their senses (act on adverse Yarran info) and keep 19 which would have enabled the selection of Dunkley. You're acting as if this scenario was an impossibility when indeed it was the correct course of action in order to extricate themselves from the parlous situation they found themselves in.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #50 on: November 23, 2016, 01:32:47 PM »
Wow, Balm was just saying on SEN that he'll remain on the list for the rest of this season so he actually hasent been delisted as such!
I'm not sure why or how but this now makes the whole thing look like a bigger joke :banghead

Ok...now I'm slightly annoyed....
Watch it roll into the 3rd year :snidegrin

Online pmac21

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4952
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #51 on: November 23, 2016, 01:40:11 PM »
Yep board needs a shake up.  Now's our chance

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #52 on: November 23, 2016, 01:48:31 PM »
Called it before we recruited him. I wanted Dunkley with that pick.
What?

You would have given up two seconds rounders for Dunkley?

I say rubbish!

Because in the end pick 31 would never have got Dunkley.....
Clarify that statement. Are you saying I didn't state that at the time? I always wanted Dunkley with our 2nd rounder. The fact that we improved our draft position to 19 by including a future 2nd round pick in prior negotiations never altered my position.
I'm saying that they only traded for pick 19 to get Yarran. If they wanted Dunkley, they would either have picked him at 12 or hoped he slid to 31. There is no way known they would have done the trade to get 19 for Dunkley. That is reality. What you are saying was never a real option. So what is the purpose of staying something that would never ever have occurred?
Late in negotiations (after the horse trading to get 19) they still had time to come to their senses (act on adverse Yarran info) and keep 19 which would have enabled the selection of Dunkley. You're acting as if this scenario was an impossibility when indeed it was the correct course of action in order to extricate themselves from the parlous situation they found themselves in.

Imagine if we had of caved and gave up pick 12.........

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #53 on: November 23, 2016, 01:59:02 PM »
Called it before we recruited him. I wanted Dunkley with that pick.
What?

You would have given up two seconds rounders for Dunkley?

I say rubbish!

Because in the end pick 31 would never have got Dunkley.....
Clarify that statement. Are you saying I didn't state that at the time? I always wanted Dunkley with our 2nd rounder. The fact that we improved our draft position to 19 by including a future 2nd round pick in prior negotiations never altered my position.
I'm saying that they only traded for pick 19 to get Yarran. If they wanted Dunkley, they would either have picked him at 12 or hoped he slid to 31. There is no way known they would have done the trade to get 19 for Dunkley. That is reality. What you are saying was never a real option. So what is the purpose of staying something that would never ever have occurred?
Late in negotiations (after the horse trading to get 19) they still had time to come to their senses (act on adverse Yarran info) and keep 19 which would have enabled the selection of Dunkley. You're acting as if this scenario was an impossibility when indeed it was the correct course of action in order to extricate themselves from the parlous situation they found themselves in.

Imagine if we had of caved and gave up pick 12.........
Thank heavens for small mercies......;so they say.

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #54 on: November 23, 2016, 02:04:07 PM »
Well Carltank, pulled our pants down, dipped its biggest jagged chunk of metal in salt, sand and vinegar and rammed it in our clubs cloaca.  I hope our response will send shivers down spines for decades to come.  Mother idiots.
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19973
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #55 on: November 23, 2016, 02:23:50 PM »
Now paying two blokes not to play for us....Deledio & Yarran.... :gotigers
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

“If women stopped working, everything would be fine. If men stopped working, everyone would die.”

Offline Nqtiger

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #56 on: November 23, 2016, 02:32:50 PM »
Quite surprised they didnt keep up the smoke screen until after the board elections. 
Chris can now concentrate on dealing and fixing his issues and thats great.

Now my beef is with this basket case of a club...who is responsible for putting us into this situation?  By responsible I mean, who put forward the idea and who signed off on it, because taking into account
1. 2 year extrension before this year to our coach
2. 2 year extrension then given to Hampson, prior to review which quite clearly pointed to the football dept not being up to par with its desicions
3. The review ending up with most of the football staff hired being marched out

and now this,  I cant understand how there are people at the club still employed in their positions. i.e. Dan Richardson and Blair Hartley to name 2.

I have heard the SEN grab with Balme with Ralph and its pretty concerning that his usual calm self was put to the side today...tipping he didnt know what he signed on for as well...we are in deep poo with this board pulling swifty after swifty

Its crystal cleat that the current CEO and the board he steers, has no idea on how to build a footy team...they might be good at bringing out nice pics of graphs and promoting our standing in the community but when it comes to football they miss the mark by a very very long way

It's all spin spin pin at the club

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #57 on: November 23, 2016, 05:15:28 PM »
I am in a sort of complicated shock

The same sort of shock you get from a rusty trumbone
How do you know that?

How do you NOT know that? You're slipping if you don't get one at least once :shh

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #58 on: November 23, 2016, 05:17:10 PM »
Now paying two blokes not to play for us....Deledio & Yarran.... :gotigers

Taking stability to a whole new level

Offline Harry

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1446
  • Fighting injustice and incompetence
Re: Yarran Cut from list...official
« Reply #59 on: November 23, 2016, 05:23:18 PM »
Now paying two blokes not to play for us....Deledio & Yarran.... :gotigers

Taking stability to a whole new level

Remember change leads to chaos.  Peg told us so
Does anyone have half an idea on anything?