Author Topic: Jack Graham that is [merged]  (Read 164933 times)

Online wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • In Absentia
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1035 on: August 05, 2023, 07:13:01 AM »
Hopefully Dimma loves him that much he will offer something crazy for him
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1036 on: August 05, 2023, 10:21:11 AM »
Very inconsistent , missed his opportunity to stand up , no excuses unless he was injured

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39000
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1037 on: August 05, 2023, 10:22:21 AM »
Pathetic effort. Should have stood up given 2 senior mids were out.

A battler who won’t take us forward and is keeping a kid from getting a game

Bit hard to stand up in the middle when they had him playing HFF for the so much of the game

But agree he had a shocker.

Actually it's hard to find any one who didn't have a shocker
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Online The Machine

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3577
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1038 on: August 05, 2023, 10:40:08 AM »
Ross and Banks were the only highlights for me. The rest had stinkers.

Online The Machine

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3577
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1039 on: August 05, 2023, 10:44:20 AM »
And Coulthard showed glimpses of what he can deliver. A small positive.

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3868
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1040 on: August 05, 2023, 12:33:33 PM »
Ross and Banks were the only highlights for me. The rest had stinkers.

We needed more from you
That’s for sure

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1041 on: August 05, 2023, 02:44:56 PM »
His tradeable fullstop.

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3868
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1042 on: August 05, 2023, 04:00:20 PM »
His tradeable fullstop.

Would get stuff all for him

The saddest part , he tries so hard and gets the most from himself .. and clearly a loved clubman

Problem is he is a slow plodder with average skills

I’d keep him if he’s getting paid minimal .. can’t all be champions with a salary cap in place



Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7577
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1043 on: August 05, 2023, 04:01:27 PM »
His tradeable fullstop.

Would get stuff all for him

The saddest part , he tries so hard and gets the most from himself .. and clearly a loved clubman

Problem is he is a slow plodder with average skills

I’d keep him if he’s getting paid minimal .. can’t all be champions with a salary cap in place

Yep.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Tiger_In_Sicily

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1044 on: August 05, 2023, 04:25:52 PM »
How many forget how important he was during our successful years and during finals games .

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17863
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1045 on: August 05, 2023, 05:07:45 PM »
So was George - that was then this is now. :shh
"Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire." 

- Gustav Mahler


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3868
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1046 on: August 05, 2023, 05:52:11 PM »
So was George - that was then this is now. :shh

Townsend was also pretty important in 2017

Oh how they forget

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3861
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1047 on: August 06, 2023, 09:18:21 PM »
Will this week be a good week for him. Or will the mediocrity continue. Me thinks its a bit early for him to have a good game so the expectation is more mediocrity.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3861
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1048 on: August 10, 2023, 11:42:31 AM »
Okay who would agree that Jack Graham because of limitations should play primarily as an inside mid.I think most would agree with that.

Every now and then he has popped up and kicked a goal here and a goal there but again i think most would agree he is not a fwd.
Simply put he is not a defender too many limitations.

To play imo he must play as an inside mid and be good at what all that implies. For me there are way too many better small inside mids at other clubs so we need an upgrade if we are to compete.

Most clubs will go with one or two small inside mids and then surround them with bigger mids.
I looked at similar sized mids 183cm and under who play mostly inside or win plenty of contested ball and clearances with good disposal and tackle numbers.These to me are the prerequisites to play inside.

When doing this exercise it becomes clear we need an upgrade on Jack Graham. I would go even further and say with Prestia and Bolton as mids we do not need another small inside mid who is just very average in the role. we need to surround those two with bigger mids like most sides do.

If we are to play another small  mid he must have a very good outside game to go with it which Graham does not.

We really should be looking to trade him and we should be proactive in trying to find the next Prestia.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17863
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Jack Graham that is [merged]
« Reply #1049 on: August 13, 2023, 07:33:16 PM »
How'd you go today Machine Man? Were you even out there? Think I might've seen someone trailing ten metres behind the Saints ball carriers a few times and losing ground- just assumed it was you... :shh
"Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire." 

- Gustav Mahler


FJ is the only one that makes sense.