Author Topic: Trade targets 2017  (Read 193129 times)

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7581
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #195 on: June 02, 2017, 09:01:31 PM »
If Miles is actually off to Sydney then we should package him up as part of a deal for Zak Jones... :shh

Zak Jones is panels ahead of Miles. Minimum would be a first rounder
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17874
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #196 on: June 02, 2017, 09:07:42 PM »
Hence why I didn't suggest a straight swap would get it done.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #197 on: June 03, 2017, 09:12:25 AM »
If Miles is actually off to Sydney then we should package him up as part of a deal for Zak Jones... :shh

Zak Jones is panels ahead of Miles. Minimum would be a first rounder
He is not worth a first rounder at this stage imo. Not even close.
We need to keep ours for KPP.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #198 on: June 03, 2017, 10:21:41 AM »
If Miles is actually off to Sydney then we should package him up as part of a deal for Zak Jones... :shh

Zak Jones is panels ahead of Miles. Minimum would be a first rounder
He is not worth a first rounder at this stage imo. Not even close.
We need to keep ours for KPP.
Agree 100%.

Why would we need to get Zac Jones anyway?
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17874
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #199 on: June 03, 2017, 11:52:06 AM »
Because he's a very good player not even at his peak yet and can play inside and down back, two areas whre we need more quality & depth.  :shh

"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7581
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #200 on: June 03, 2017, 03:46:39 PM »
He's everything Houli isn't.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #201 on: June 03, 2017, 06:39:14 PM »
Because he's a very good player not even at his peak yet and can play inside and down back, two areas whre we need more quality & depth.  :shh
Would you give away one of our first rounders for him?

Offline Slipper

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #202 on: June 03, 2017, 06:44:18 PM »
Because he's a very good player not even at his peak yet and can play inside and down back, two areas whre we need more quality & depth.  :shh
We you give away one of our first rounders for him?

That question should probably be our first 1st rounder. I get the feeling our second will be used securing Patrick Naish.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #203 on: June 03, 2017, 11:42:37 PM »
Because he's a very good player not even at his peak yet and can play inside and down back, two areas whre we need more quality & depth.  :shh
We you give away one of our first rounders for him?

That question should probably be our first 1st rounder. I get the feeling our second will be used securing Patrick Naish.

Someone will bid just to push us to use it, we seem to do it to everyone else

Online taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2033
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #204 on: June 04, 2017, 02:50:30 PM »
Because he's a very good player not even at his peak yet and can play inside and down back, two areas whre we need more quality & depth.  :shh
We you give away one of our first rounders for him?

That question should probably be our first 1st rounder. I get the feeling our second will be used securing Patrick Naish.

haven't got a 2nd rounder next draft have we ?

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17874
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #205 on: June 04, 2017, 03:43:46 PM »
Because he's a very good player not even at his peak yet and can play inside and down back, two areas whre we need more quality & depth.  :shh
Would you give away one of our first rounders for him?

Yes, no, maybe...
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #206 on: June 04, 2017, 07:29:28 PM »
Please do it Chris Fagen  :pray :pray

If Schache wants out, he could be banished to NEAFL
Dinny Navaratnam  June 4, 2017 3:00 PM


IF YOUNG Brisbane Lions forward Josh Schache announces he wants to leave the club before the end of the season, coach Chris Fagan will "think twice" about whether the Victorian will play in the senior side again.

Schache took leave and returned home to Seymour after playing in the NEAFL a fortnight ago.

The 19-year-old will return to the club on Monday and the coach has been in contact with the key forward.

The No.2 pick in the 2015 NAB AFL Draft is out of contract at the end of the season and Fagan told Fox Footy if Schache decides he wants out, he might struggle to play in the AFL again this year.

"It's an interesting one about the continuation to play. If a guy decides he's going to leave your footy club and he's not going to help you into the future, and you're not in the finals race, you probably have to think twice about investing games into him, as opposed to another young player who's going to stay," Fagan said.

The Lions are on the bottom of the ladder, having lost nine straight matches since beating Gold Coast in round one.

Schache has struggled this season, playing six games for six goals.

Fagan said he would not be part of discussions with Schache's manager David Trotter, instead leaving it to Lions football manager David Noble. The coach was unsure when Schache would make his decision.

"I don't know what the timeframe is on that. I don't know whether the two weeks will escalate things or not," Fagan said.

Schache wanted to play for the Lions in the lead-up to being drafted because his late father Laurence played 29 games for the Brisbane Bears.

Fagan is still the Lions would retain Schache.

"I'm very hopeful that he'll stay. I think Brisbane's looked after him incredibly well. I'm not in Josh's mind and body, and he might be incredibly homesick. That's something that's very difficult to stop, if that's what's happening," Fagan said.

"I know that we've done everything as a club to help him and I know he knows that. We'll just see how it goes but I've still got a strong level of optimism that he'll stay with us."

In any case, Fagan expects to see Schache in a much better mood upon his return.

"The break here at home's done him the world of good and hopefully when he comes back tomorrow he's a happier chap than what he was when he came home. It's important to look after the wellbeing of your players and he's been under a lot of pressure," Fagan said.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-06-04/if-schache-wants-out-fagan-may-banish-him-to-neafl

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #207 on: June 04, 2017, 07:45:41 PM »
When was the last time we used our first pick on a KPP?
Jack?

That's about 10 odd years ago.

That really doesn't make much sense does it??

It's time I'd say....

Dougeytherichmondfan

  • Guest
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #208 on: June 04, 2017, 08:09:33 PM »
When was the last time we used our first pick on a KPP?
Jack?

That's about 10 odd years ago.

That really doesn't make much sense does it??

It's time I'd say....
'07 we took Rance with our 2nd pick (end of first round), when we couldn't say no to Cotchin at #2.
'08 we took Vickery
'09 we took Griffiths with our 2nd pick (also end of first round) when we couldn't say no to Martin at #3.

Offline Slipper

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1942
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #209 on: June 04, 2017, 08:15:39 PM »
Vickery was supposed to be a ruckman, not a KPP.