Author Topic: Trade targets 2017  (Read 216779 times)

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #105 on: May 11, 2017, 10:34:29 AM »
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9982
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #106 on: May 11, 2017, 11:54:06 AM »
Any word on kieran Collins ? I liked the look of him in the draft, I believe the doggies got him. Don't think he's getting games. Worth a look ?

Him AND Redpath who is losing games behind Cloke when fit. Kicked 6 on return from ACL in the VFL.

Would look at Marcus Adams too. Beast+++++

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2888
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #107 on: May 11, 2017, 02:12:16 PM »
I doubt they'd get ret rid of redpath with Cloke to retire in the next few years. Redpath is better than Cloke anyway imo. I'd give our second first round for Collins though. Basically like drafting him. Fills a need.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #108 on: May 11, 2017, 02:27:48 PM »
Can live with us trading one first rounder but not both....though if both are outside the top 10 I wouldn't be adverse to swapping them for a top 5 pick.... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #109 on: May 11, 2017, 02:56:22 PM »
Don't think Redpath is losing games to Cloke, he's just come back from injury and Cloke hasn't even played for a few weeks. Reckon they'll go with Redpath before or with Cloke making him unattainable

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #110 on: May 11, 2017, 06:31:00 PM »
Free agency could see key Swan Sam Reid head to Victoria

afl.com.au
11 May 2017


SYDNEY spearhead Sam Reid has firmed as this year's most highly coveted free agent behind Nat Fyfe and Dustin Martin while his contract talks with the Swans remain at a preliminary stage.

Reid last month declared his desire to stay with the Swans beyond 2017, but the former Murray Bushranger has attracted strong interest in Victoria, with industry sources saying Richmond and Collingwood head his long queue of suitors.

Midfielders Fyfe and Martin are unmistakably the prized catches in this year's free agency pool, with rival clubs prepared to offer both more than a $1 million a season. Some clubs could offer considerably more than that, especially for Fyfe.

However, with key forwards in demand across the competition and a 20 per cent salary cap hike expected from this year under the forthcoming CBA, rival clubs believe Reid could command offers of up to $800,000 a season.

The 25-year-old, who is in the final year of a lucrative five-season contract, remains in ongoing dialogue with Sydney via his manager, Paul Connors, but his future appears likely to remain uncertain for some time.

Reid's restricted status gives Sydney the right to match any rival offers made in October's free agency period, but the Swans' efforts to re-sign him could be complicated by their tight salary cap and the rising market worth of out-of-contract defender Zak Jones.

After missing the entire 2016 season with calf, hamstring and Achilles tendon problems, Reid has made a welcome return to form and fitness this year.

After seven rounds, he has played every game and averaged 13.6 possessions and 5.1 marks. He is also ranked second at the Swans for goals (11), contested marks (nine) and marks inside 50 (11), and equal second for goal assists (five).

Reid is understood to be happy to focus on his football for the moment, confident that the more he plays the more he underlines his on-field value.

Richmond has had its eye on Reid for some time, and the forward could help address the club's lack of aerial support for spearhead Jack Riewoldt.

Collingwood is also determined to add a quality key forward to an attack that since Travis Cloke's departure to the Western Bulldogs at the end of last year has relied on third-year tall Darcy Moore as its focal point. 

The Tigers and Magpies are also, however, among a slew of Victorian clubs circling out-of-contract Lions youngster Josh Schache, and could have to decide later this year whether he or Reid is their No.1 priority.

Reid recently spoke emphatically about wanting to play on with the Swans.

"There is no reason why I would leave. I love the lifestyle, my soon-to-be wife is from Sydney so there are plenty of reasons to stay," Reid told News Corp last month.

"I'm focusing on what is happening on the field, I'm letting my management and the club sort that out. I just want to make sure I get out there and have an impact."

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-05-11/free-agency-could-see-key-swan-sam-reid-head-to-victoria

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #111 on: May 11, 2017, 06:39:09 PM »
am i the only person who doesn't rate this bloke at all? and for 800k. Please.





Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #112 on: May 11, 2017, 06:44:10 PM »
am i the only person who doesn't rate this bloke at all? and for 800k. Please.

Average footballer.
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #113 on: May 11, 2017, 06:53:44 PM »
He's better than average but he's unreliable on a number of levels. I wonder if the Swans are trying to push his value up in the media and land themselves a Vickery compensation pick
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #114 on: May 11, 2017, 07:21:17 PM »
$800K??
Wouldn't think so although we are suppose to be paying Prestia $700 so anything is possible.

He is worth maybe $500k imo and that is stretching it.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #115 on: May 12, 2017, 12:48:20 AM »
Probably but he's an atheltic tall who has show signs at times. People pay for those types, warranted or not

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #116 on: May 12, 2017, 12:07:11 PM »
Probably but he's an atheltic tall who has show signs at times. People pay for those types, warranted or not

Tyrone Vickery anyone?
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #117 on: May 12, 2017, 05:09:16 PM »
We have a couple of early picks this year, should get it done

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #118 on: May 12, 2017, 05:35:27 PM »
We have a couple of early picks this year, should get it done

are you suggesting we should use one of those picks for Reid?

Offline Chopstix

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 71
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade targets 2017
« Reply #119 on: May 12, 2017, 06:59:39 PM »
Reid is a free agent so no need to trade.