Author Topic: Biggest sooky little babies?  (Read 243803 times)

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #960 on: November 11, 2021, 12:17:18 PM »
Did you see Kane Cornes post in there?  He supports Gale

"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #961 on: November 12, 2021, 08:43:59 PM »
Quote from: Daniel O'Neill
I’m sure Port would love to have more opportunities to play at the G rather than the 2 or so games they get per season. If any team doesn’t need more games at the G though, it’s the Tiges.
https://twitter.com/Dan_Iel78/status/1458922171498053646

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #962 on: November 20, 2021, 06:55:56 AM »
In response to Brereton saying we'll win the flag next year ...

Quote from: Grant
Lol this bloke has suffered way too many concussions Richmond won’t even make the 8.
https://twitter.com/grant_finlayson/status/1460889270009282561

Quote from: EssEnDoN-Proud Lifer 👍AZ💉💉👍
Going to be tough from 9th
https://twitter.com/KRUDLER62/status/1460896518030827522

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #963 on: November 20, 2021, 07:15:13 PM »
 They the way they think they are funny.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #964 on: November 24, 2021, 08:38:25 PM »
Quote from: Glenn Jongebloed
Lol at Richmond having pick 9 #AFLDraft
https://twitter.com/Fearsword/status/1463434948153516036

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #965 on: November 24, 2021, 09:54:00 PM »
Just look at the clowns feed cyclops he is a certifiable nutter
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #966 on: November 24, 2021, 10:26:06 PM »
Quote from: Kingy
Good luck to Tom Brown at the Tigers.

The Browns are a cracking family.

Just a pity there wasn't another 16 games for Paul at Geelong.

Ironically, the Tigers used a pick they got from the Cats.
Quote from: Lord McBain
They are a trash club. Just another reason to hate them… they’re not quite hawthorn but they’re getting there
Quote from: Lord McBain
It’s Richmond… that’s not a good home for decent people
https://twitter.com/LordMcBain/status/1463464717989527556

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #967 on: November 25, 2021, 05:33:57 AM »
Geelong forum after we took Tom Brown:

Quote from: rocker_oz33
***** took Brown.
Quote from: Two Planks
Mongrels
Quote from: dazbroncos
Tigers take with pick 17 Tom Brown.

Just to f*** with us.

Early?!?!
Quote from: Turbocat
Friggin Rich take Tom Brown..... so much for those that thought we were getting sucked in because he was a Father Son
Quote from: calder_daddy
Lol

Even more reason to hate the Tuggers
Quote from: petrolium
Brown will eventually be a Cat. Mark my words
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2021-afl-live-draft-thread-with-a-geelong-slant.1293265/page-9

Offline Gracie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1342
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #968 on: November 25, 2021, 09:57:21 AM »

Quote from: petrolium
Brown will eventually be a Cat. Mark my words

We can get a 2nd round pick in 2033 when we trade him to Geelong. Will only be 30 so might be a bit young for them

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #969 on: November 25, 2021, 08:40:43 PM »
Yeah, they will keep him in the vfl til he matures
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #970 on: November 28, 2021, 06:47:52 PM »

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #971 on: December 14, 2021, 04:53:23 PM »
Eagles fan.

Quote from: Baird
Why is Richmond in the title and not Essendon? Even Carlton I reckon has more fans than Richmond

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/which-club-has-the-biggest-supporter-base-collingwood-richmond-or-west-coast.1239860/page-59#post-73159073

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #972 on: December 15, 2021, 07:39:09 PM »
lol the bloke at the end sums it up beautifully.  Dunny budgie lol
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #973 on: December 26, 2021, 05:22:13 AM »
Quote from: cats_09
What was the BS reason why Richmond after winning a premiership couldn't travel down the highway for our home match?

Just curious because current premiers Melbourne & fellow grand finalist Western Bulldogs, both have trips down the highway next season...
Quote from: kickazz
I suppose they figure Richmond at the moment will still pull a bigger crowd. A fews years of mediocrity and a fall off in attendances would see them back at KP - especially if any of Essendon, Collingwood, Carlton become any good.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/2022-season-fixture-ticketing-info.1294364/page-2

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Biggest sooky little babies?
« Reply #974 on: December 26, 2021, 07:36:25 PM »
Quote from: Big Ben
... there is no possible way anyone can argue Richmond's 'dynasty' was better than ours [Hawthorn].

Richmond 2017-2020 are more comparable to Adelaide 1997-1998, a good but not great team which got it done when it mattered thanks to individual brilliance from Dusty/McLeod on the big stage.

That's not to mention Shane Ellen kicking 5 goals in 1997 from a forward pocket, Jack Graham kicking 3 goals in 2017 while tagging Sloane in the midfield, and some individual brilliance from Houli/Jarman on the biggest stage.

Adelaide's 1999 season and Richmond's 2021 season were both quite similar to each other as well. Adelaide getting flogged twice by North Melbourne in 1999 after beating them in the 1998 grand final and Richmond getting flogged by Geelong twice in 2021 after beating them in the 2020 grand final is the main similarity worth pointing out, along with both premiership defences being neck and neck with one another for the worst premiership defence in recent memory.

Yes, before anyone says it, Hawthorn 2009 and Bulldogs 2017 were both poor premiership defences, but neither were as poor as Adelaide 1999 and Richmond 2021.

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/greatest-dynasty-of-the-21st-century-lions-vs-cats-vs-hawks-vs-tigers.1286802/post-72805904