Sam made some very relivant points (I know hard to believe) about Terry Wallace as a coach. The proof is (according to Sam and Browny who he questioned) is that he can coach, he has the players behind him, is tactically strong and is developing the list.
Sam also made the point that if a new coach came in it would take 3 years to get the team playing like they want them to and before they had a chance to succeed. Sam didn't belive anyone else could do a better job but Gary said that the state of the list was his responsibility and therefor he should shoulder the critism.
Crawf said that Richmond did not play as a team but rather as individuals which I, unfortunately, have to agree with at the moment unless I see more shepherding, tackling, 1% and less possession chasing.
Interesting discussion
Stripes