And if anyone can explain to me DRS I'd appreciate. The Paine call was bizarre and that's being kind
Former test umpire Talbot explained that the 3rd umpire ticks off his checks:
1. Proximity of the ball to the bat?
2. Any deviation of the ball?
3. Hotspot?
4. Snicko (RTS)?
Even if the first three show no evidence of a snick, if snicko shows even a small spike as the ball passes the bat or the next frame after that (as light travels faster than sound) then the batsman will be given out.
Simon Taufel was the best umpire of his generation
Paul (Blocker) Wilson is not.
What you've just pointed out, what Taufel expalined highlights why the decision makes no sense
In India's innings there was a review. Original decision was not out. On review there was no hotspot, and a ever so slight spike on Snicko. Decision was not reversed and it remained not out. Now applying what Taufel said (the protocols) it should have been out........but not on Blocker's watch.
And that's why the DRS system is flawed. You are still relying on umpires to make decisions despite the technology. And as our 2nd tier umpires have shown not just in this test series but especially in the BBL, they are not up to it.
Never been a fan of neutral umpires but bring them back! Our umpires have put the chances of home umpires being returned permanently in the bin. Oxenbauld has been pathetic
and BTW it was great to be back at the MCG