Author Topic: Rhyan Mansell [merged]  (Read 42928 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #315 on: June 16, 2023, 09:54:01 AM »
Dann (Tigers): The Tribunal was dealing with a case of unavoidable contact between two players travelling at high speed with high momentum.

Source: Foxsports.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #316 on: June 16, 2023, 09:58:10 AM »
Dann (Tigers) says the real question in this case is: "Whether a player who does no more than takes reasonable action to protect themselves and brace for an unavoidable collision can be involved in the bumping of another player."

Source: Foxsports.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #317 on: June 16, 2023, 10:04:17 AM »
Dann (Tigers): It has to remain a fundamental entitlement that any player, called upon in certain circumstances, can be able to protect themselves.

Dann (Tigers): Just as in everyday life, a person has an entitlement in certain extreme circumstances to take action to protect themselves.

Source: Foxsports.

:yep

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #318 on: June 16, 2023, 10:08:00 AM »
Dann (Tigers) says the notion put to Mansell that he could've tackled "would've been a recipe for disaster" and risked face-to-face, head-to-head contact.

Source: Foxsports.

:yep


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #319 on: June 16, 2023, 10:18:10 AM »
Dann (Tigers) says that if this decision is upheld, it will "promote risk of injury, promote risk of concussion, deny a fundamental entitlement of the player to take reasonable action to protect themselves."

Source: Foxsports.

:yep

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #320 on: June 16, 2023, 10:34:24 AM »
Appeal Board chair Murray Kellam asks for a two-minute break because there he has "something I need to attend to."

Before he is muted and his camera is turned off, he can be heard saying "have you got the oven on?"

I cannot make this up. We are now back.

Source: Foxsports.

 :huh


Online Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #321 on: June 16, 2023, 10:35:18 AM »
Got to get the pies in the oven for post decision lunch

Offline Tiger Tragic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 980
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #322 on: June 16, 2023, 10:35:51 AM »
Before he is muted and his camera is turned off, he can be heard saying "have you got the oven on?"


 :snidegrin

Every man needs his sausage rolls

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #323 on: June 16, 2023, 10:37:54 AM »
Hannon (AFL) says the Tribunal's reasons may've been brief on Tuesday, "but that does not mean that they are wrong."

"The Tribunal expressly found a metre or two from impact, Mansell turned and bumped."

Hannon (AFL): The meaning of 'bump' or the act of bumping shouldn't be constrained narrowly, but given a wide interpretation, consistent with the remedial purpose of affording players protection in their on-field workplace.

Source: Foxsports.


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #324 on: June 16, 2023, 10:49:02 AM »
The Appeal Board is now deliberating.

Kellam says before departing: "I'm sure you'll have time for a coffee and a sandwich if you feel like it."

Source: Foxsports.

Offline Assange Tiger 😎

  • Bong Lord
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3426
  • Leader Of AT's Outsiders
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #325 on: June 16, 2023, 10:57:16 AM »
Can we use their oven
I work in Africa and they were taking the pee out of me for saving Africa.......
"Living the dream ,not as a slave to the system. If that makes me a tosser, then I'm a proud tosser... I have plenty of time to toss"

Online Hart4Jack

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 76
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #326 on: June 16, 2023, 11:03:38 AM »
If we lose this appeal, I think we'll be watching Gaelic football with an oval ball in the very near future.  :banghead :thumbsdown

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #327 on: June 16, 2023, 11:16:30 AM »
Still deliberating ...














= Munching on party pies and sausage rolls swished down with a cafe latte :whistle.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #328 on: June 16, 2023, 11:24:48 AM »
What a professional Organisation the AFL is, just a minute my pies are burning

https://twitter.com/nqtiger/status/1669514615401902080



Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 95957
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Richmond to appeal Mansell's 3 match ban [update]
« Reply #329 on: June 16, 2023, 11:30:43 AM »
The Appeal Board is still deliberating.

https://twitter.com/DavidZita1/status/1669517405926887424



Probably they've moved onto dessert. Biscotti anyone?