Author Topic: Sam Banks [merged]  (Read 28636 times)

Online Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4794
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #105 on: August 11, 2024, 07:39:14 PM »
Missed the game. Was he playing off the wing or half back?

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8418
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #106 on: August 11, 2024, 10:02:47 PM »
Thought he was good

But highlighted our fitness issues. Ran out of gas in the last qtr

Thought he looked great.
"The money might have been better. But, at the end of the day, Richmond showed faith in me. It's only fair that now we're 18th on the ladder, I show the faith back in the club and do everything I can to put them in front. In the end, I'm stoked I made the decision to stay. I f***ing love this club”

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4319
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #107 on: August 12, 2024, 10:21:52 PM »
Most bruise free game of the year and he thrived. Just throwing up a different perspective here. As usual the nuffies will not like it.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4029
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #108 on: August 13, 2024, 02:28:50 PM »
Most bruise free game of the year and he thrived. Just throwing up a different perspective here. As usual the nuffies will not like it.

Loool that's because you want people to believe your narrative and don't see the player for what he is and his role.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10600
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #109 on: August 13, 2024, 04:08:33 PM »
Most bruise free game of the year and he thrived. Just throwing up a different perspective here. As usual the nuffies will not like it.

Did you watch it? Honest question.

Shame we can't have 5 of each Cotchin, Voss, Archer etc.

Should be 26 hard nuts on every team.

Offline the claw

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4319
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #110 on: August 13, 2024, 06:24:54 PM »
Most bruise free game of the year and he thrived. Just throwing up a different perspective here. As usual the nuffies will not like it.

Loool that's because you want people to believe your narrative and don't see the player for what he is and his role.
I don't need anyone to believe anything i say. I say what i see and i try to not just follow the obvious. you can either like it or lump it or not even read it.
That has never changed with me.

So lets see here. go onto any site and the knock is he does not like contact and has not played well under pressure.
Some of it quite severe criticism.

Was just pointing out it was a bruise free tackle free no pressure game and in that context id be careful about how high id rate his game. They can all look great in those games its under pressure where there is plenty of pressure that we need him to improve.

Great he thrived in a bruise free game but context please.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 99978
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #111 on: May 11, 2025, 05:45:37 PM »
What did we all think of Banks' game today?

His highest return stats wise at least.

28 disposals (19k, 9h, 3c, 21u, 89.3% eff.)
6 marks
1 tackle
2 clearances (1 cc)
5 inside 50s
660m gained
2 intercepts
5 score involvements
1 goal assist
82% gametime

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10600
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #112 on: May 11, 2025, 05:46:46 PM »
I'd have to watch the replay because those stats surprise me.

Maybe I just didn't see his impact from where I was sitting.

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3183
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #113 on: May 11, 2025, 06:09:00 PM »
Still not sure of what his strengths are. Nothing stands out

Online camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2510
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #114 on: May 11, 2025, 10:31:33 PM »
He was voted BOG by many in the media , I ‘d say 660 meters gained is impressive for a half back.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19894
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #115 on: May 12, 2025, 12:54:02 AM »
Further proof that stats are mostly misleading  bollocks, was a liability in the third and makes Ralphsmith look like Isaac Smith. :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

“If women stopped working, everything would be fine. If men stopped working, everyone would die.”

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5205
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #116 on: May 12, 2025, 10:03:35 AM »
Further proof that stats are mostly misleading  bollocks, was a liability in the third and makes Ralphsmith look like Isaac Smith. :shh

Jeez your harsh on some players.

I reckon he was good, especially in the last q.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19894
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #117 on: May 12, 2025, 01:02:45 PM »
Further proof that stats are mostly misleading  bollocks, was a liability in the third and makes Ralphsmith look like Isaac Smith. :shh

Jeez your harsh on some players.

I reckon he was good, especially in the last q.

Spend the third quarter in the crapper? Then you still would've seen it because that where his game was.  Even Yze pointed it out in post match press conference. :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell

“If women stopped working, everything would be fine. If men stopped working, everyone would die.”

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5205
  • All up inside ya.
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #118 on: May 12, 2025, 01:05:11 PM »
Further proof that stats are mostly misleading  bollocks, was a liability in the third and makes Ralphsmith look like Isaac Smith. :shh

Jeez your harsh on some players.

I reckon he was good, especially in the last q.

Third q was poor but that doesn't represent his whole game.

Spend the third quarter in the crapper? Then you still would've seen it because that where his game was.  Even Yze pointed it out in post match press conference. :shh

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4029
Re: Sam Banks [merged]
« Reply #119 on: May 12, 2025, 01:31:44 PM »
Further proof that stats are mostly misleading  bollocks, was a liability in the third and makes Ralphsmith look like Isaac Smith. :shh

Jeez your harsh on some players.

I reckon he was good, especially in the last q.

Spend the third quarter in the crapper? Then you still would've seen it because that where his game was.  Even Yze pointed it out in post match press conference. :shh

💯 he did point it out Yze , but he recovered and did well after thar.