Author Topic: Tylar Young [merged]  (Read 29480 times)

Offline Tiger_In_Sicily

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #180 on: May 26, 2024, 03:03:48 PM »
Only VFL but Kosi looked far better down back yesterday than Young has at any point this year.... :shh
Kosi played in defence all his junior years . Maybe that's his natural position

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19395
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #181 on: May 26, 2024, 03:06:55 PM »
Dawks supporters reckon he was shyte down there and he's best games were when he rucked.......so who knows...... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Tiger_In_Sicily

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #182 on: May 26, 2024, 03:10:53 PM »
Dawks supporters reckon he was shyte down there and he's best games were when he rucked.......so who knows...... :shh
Never realised hawk supporters watched Kosi play in his junior days

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19395
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #183 on: May 26, 2024, 03:19:32 PM »
No but they did when he played down back at Hawthorn....said he was even worse than he was up forward...... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline Tiger_In_Sicily

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #184 on: May 26, 2024, 04:22:18 PM »
Must be factual then  :shh :shh
We can all  :shh

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19395
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #185 on: May 26, 2024, 04:25:02 PM »
lmao another flog triggered by the mighty shoosh..... yeah what would supporters who've seen more of him than anyone else know?   :shh :shh :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98034
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #186 on: May 27, 2024, 08:00:16 AM »
Scans have confirmed that defender Tylar Young suffered a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament.

Richmond General Manager- Football Performance Tim Livingstone said it was a devastating blow for the key defender.

“It is disappointing for Tylar, who has been an important player for us across the past 18 months," he said.

“We will give Tylar all the support he needs and help him throughout his rehabilitation. He is still a young player, and we know he will return fit, strong, and ready to continue to make an impact in 2025."

https://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/1564860/tylar-young-injury-update

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40264
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Tylar Young Promoted to Seniot Lsit
« Reply #187 on: November 12, 2024, 09:01:53 PM »
From Cal Twomey X (Twitter)

Eight players have been registered by their club to be promoted from the rookie to senior list (more can also follow).

The group is: Jordan Boyd (Carlton), Karl Worner (Frem), Judd McVee, Jake Melksham (Melb), Jed McEntee (PA), Tylar Young (Rich), Max Heath, Cooper Sharman (StK)

https://x.com/CalTwomey/status/1856227160991949273?t=D3BQv34ErkuIq3zOBhCQBA&s=19
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8074
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #188 on: November 13, 2024, 04:37:25 PM »
Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4410
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #189 on: November 13, 2024, 05:29:19 PM »
Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

Our rookie list is absolutely bloated compared to our primary list. I’m surprised he is the only one that has been elevated. Makes no difference player wise, the rookie list should be put to bed. It makes no sense in modern AFL.

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #190 on: November 13, 2024, 10:12:51 PM »
Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40264
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #191 on: November 13, 2024, 10:27:14 PM »
Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8074
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #192 on: November 13, 2024, 10:30:28 PM »
Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

Spot on. Seems like a strange decision given where he is at

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #193 on: November 13, 2024, 10:45:30 PM »
Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

no idea, I thought it may have been Seth

BTW, Young has played more AFL games that the 2 you mention combined , not sure why you or anyone else finds them that good TBH

Offline Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4410
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Tylar Young [merged]
« Reply #194 on: November 13, 2024, 10:48:05 PM »
Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

no idea, I thought it may have been Seth

BTW, Young has played more AFL games that the 2 you mention combined , not sure why you or anyone else finds them that good TBH

You could argue Campbell potentially, but blight? He’s been at the club 6 months and played 3 games. For all Young’s faults, he’s certainly ahead of blight on the pecking order and that’s no fault on blight, he just hasn’t had the game time yet.