Tylar Young [merged]

[Tiger_In_Sicily]

Only VFL but Kosi looked far better down back yesterday than Young has at any point this year....

Kosi played in defence all his junior years . Maybe that's his natural position

[Diocletian]

Dawks supporters reckon he was shyte down there and he's best games were when he rucked.......so who knows......

[Tiger_In_Sicily]

Dawks supporters reckon he was shyte down there and he's best games were when he rucked.......so who knows......

Never realised hawk supporters watched Kosi play in his junior days

[Diocletian]

No but they did when he played down back at Hawthorn....said he was even worse than he was up forward......

[Tiger_In_Sicily]

Must be factual then 
We can all 

[Diocletian]

lmao another flog triggered by the mighty shoosh..... yeah what would supporters who've seen more of him than anyone else know?   

[one-eyed]

Scans have confirmed that defender Tylar Young suffered a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament.

Richmond General Manager- Football Performance Tim Livingstone said it was a devastating blow for the key defender.

“It is disappointing for Tylar, who has been an important player for us across the past 18 months," he said.

“We will give Tylar all the support he needs and help him throughout his rehabilitation. He is still a young player, and we know he will return fit, strong, and ready to continue to make an impact in 2025."

https://www.richmondfc.com.au/news/1564860/tylar-young-injury-update

[WilliamPowell]

From Cal Twomey X (Twitter)

Eight players have been registered by their club to be promoted from the rookie to senior list (more can also follow).

The group is: Jordan Boyd (Carlton), Karl Worner (Frem), Judd McVee, Jake Melksham (Melb), Jed McEntee (PA), Tylar Young (Rich), Max Heath, Cooper Sharman (StK)

https://x.com/CalTwomey/status/1856227160991949273?t=D3BQv34ErkuIq3zOBhCQBA&s=19

[Hard Roar Tiger]

Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

[Tiger Khosh]

Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

Our rookie list is absolutely bloated compared to our primary list. I’m surprised he is the only one that has been elevated. Makes no difference player wise, the rookie list should be put to bed. It makes no sense in modern AFL.

[taztiger4]

Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

[WilliamPowell]

Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

[Hard Roar Tiger]

Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

Spot on. Seems like a strange decision given where he is at

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

[taztiger4]

Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

no idea, I thought it may have been Seth

BTW, Young has played more AFL games that the 2 you mention combined , not sure why you or anyone else finds them that good TBH

[Tiger Khosh]

Okay. Not sure why we need to do this.

because we had 7 Cat A rookies which is 1 too many.

We now have 28 on main list which enables us to take 8 at the draft

But why Young?

I would have promoted Campbell or Blight ahead of Young

no idea, I thought it may have been Seth

BTW, Young has played more AFL games that the 2 you mention combined , not sure why you or anyone else finds them that good TBH

You could argue Campbell potentially, but blight? He’s been at the club 6 months and played 3 games. For all Young’s faults, he’s certainly ahead of blight on the pecking order and that’s no fault on blight, he just hasn’t had the game time yet.