Author Topic: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024  (Read 40154 times)

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7944
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #555 on: September 26, 2024, 08:43:22 PM »
I think 3 and 12/13 for Baker is both fair and delicious.
Would think it’s possible to trade Rioli for 6,12 and 20 for our 29,39,41 and 47 as those points should land them Lombard
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4347
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #556 on: September 26, 2024, 09:46:35 PM »
I think 3 and 12/13 for Baker is both fair and delicious.

If you were WCE would you think that’s fair?

How ridiculous

stuff me, why not get them to throw Reid and a couple of other guns in as steak knives   :sarcasm

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2382
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #557 on: September 26, 2024, 11:13:39 PM »
More likely to be 3 with later first back, deep draft  and Bo Allen likely to be there, they would take that imho.

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7944
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #558 on: Yesterday at 05:10:05 AM »
I think 3 and 12/13 for Baker is both fair and delicious.

If you were WCE would you think that’s fair?

How ridiculous

stuff me, why not get them to throw Reid and a couple of other guns in as steak knives   :sarcasm

It’s in the press as being on the table. I think they wanted 9 or 10 and quoted by Don Pyke so hardly ridiculous. Do some research and you can send my apology in the mail. :shh
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline Damo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4347
  • Member of famed “Gang Of Four”. Ground the airbus!
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #559 on: Yesterday at 05:50:45 AM »
I think 3 and 12/13 for Baker is both fair and delicious.

If you were WCE would you think that’s fair?

How ridiculous

stuff me, why not get them to throw Reid and a couple of other guns in as steak knives   :sarcasm

It’s in the press as being on the table. I think they wanted 9 or 10 and quoted by Don Pyke so hardly ridiculous. Do some research and you can send my apology in the mail. :shh

You have said 3 AND 12/13

Not 3 and we give WCE 12/13

So yeah , don’t stress about the forthcoming apology

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9736
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #560 on: Yesterday at 09:27:18 AM »
So Bolton + Baker for 3 + 9 (slide to 11)?

Not terrible.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9736
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #561 on: Yesterday at 09:28:57 AM »
6 is a must in the Rioli deal and I'd want 20 as well at least.

Compo for Graham 22.

So draft with 1, 3, 6, 9, 21, 22 or whatever.

Still got picks to trade out - look at GCS for Lombard maybe and get their other 1st.

Offline Hart4Jack

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #562 on: Yesterday at 10:42:59 AM »
So Bolton + Baker for 3 + 9 (slide to 11)?

Not terrible.
[/quote

Not terrible!!!   You're kidding, there's no way that acceptable, not at all.

Online Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4262
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #563 on: Yesterday at 01:12:28 PM »
So Bolton + Baker for 3 + 9 (slide to 11)?

Not terrible.

Bolton to freo for pick 9 and 10, anything less than that is unacceptable and he should be held to his contract if that isn’t the offer. We will likely be paying plenty of salary but even if not he is well worth that, especially to a team like freo who are just treading water atm as great pretenders.

Baker to WCE for their pick 13 (barrass trade).

So Bolton and Baker should net us 9, 10 & 13 from the Perth clubs before taking into account academy and father son sliding.

Are you suggesting we trade 10 and baker to WCE for pick 3? If that’s the case I’m asking for a pick back from them as well.

Online Andyy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9736
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #564 on: Yesterday at 02:14:33 PM »
So Bolton + Baker for 3 + 9 (slide to 11)?

Not terrible.

Bolton to freo for pick 9 and 10, anything less than that is unacceptable and he should be held to his contract if that isn’t the offer. We will likely be paying plenty of salary but even if not he is well worth that, especially to a team like freo who are just treading water atm as great pretenders.

Baker to WCE for their pick 13 (barrass trade).

So Bolton and Baker should net us 9, 10 & 13 from the Perth clubs before taking into account academy and father son sliding.

Are you suggesting we trade 10 and baker to WCE for pick 3? If that’s the case I’m asking for a pick back from them as well.

Yeah sorry I thought the discussion about Baker + 12 was actually Freo's 10 sliding to 12, used with Baker to get 3 from WCE.

I'd rather their 3 than 12 which will slide to 14-15.

So if we get Bolton to Freo for 9+10 which both slide 2 spots at least, I'd consider Baker + 10(12) for 3 with something coming back.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19126
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #565 on: Yesterday at 02:30:09 PM »
We wouldn't be letting -nay encouraging- contracted players of the caliber of Bolton & Rioli to leave if we didn't think we could extract absolute maximum value for them...it's been planned for months..... :shh
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Online Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4262
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #566 on: Yesterday at 04:46:32 PM »
IMO

9 and 10 for Bolton is fair.

I think 6 and 12 for Rioli is overs but I’m not complaining lol

13 for bakes is fair too.

Offline OneEyedRichmond

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #567 on: Yesterday at 06:00:03 PM »
We wouldn't be letting -nay encouraging- contracted players of the caliber of Bolton & Rioli to leave if we didn't think we could extract absolute maximum value for them...it's been planned for months..... :shh

Hence.. deals are done 😉

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97381
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #568 on: Yesterday at 07:54:59 PM »
Fremantle will offer two first-rounders for Shai Bolton, but not picks 9 and 10 given it is still holding out hope it might secure fellow Tiger Liam Baker.

https://x.com/codeaflau/status/1839581945946361946

Online Tiger Khosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4262
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Trade talk, rumours & innuendo 2024
« Reply #569 on: Yesterday at 08:28:37 PM »
Fremantle will offer two first-rounders for Shai Bolton, but not picks 9 and 10 given it is still holding out hope it might secure fellow Tiger Liam Baker.

https://x.com/codeaflau/status/1839581945946361946

No worries, you’ll get neither then.