Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
Quote from: JP Tiger on Yesterday at 01:59:22 PMQuote from: Andyy on Yesterday at 01:40:35 PMQuote from: JP Tiger on Yesterday at 12:36:48 PMQuote from: Hard Roar Tiger on Yesterday at 12:01:39 PMWhy make him a sub - that’s the point. How on earth does it help him or us?This has happened many times, I even see other sides doing the same with their first gamers. Personally I don't think its a bad idea so I don't have a problem with it. Giving the young blokes the sub vest lets them experience the game before they get thrown into it. When they do get a run they are matched up on a bloke who has already run 7kms or so, giving the young bloke an advantage. They can go hard knowing there is only a half or even a quarter left to play. We talk about the importance of development but don't want to see it or have to put up with it! We talk about green shoots but expect them to magically appear on the field as fully grown crops ready to yield fruit ... I can see your point but I just think it's wrong and I'm not convinced having a kid play as the sub does then any favours.I think playing the last 30-40min of a game would be difficult, especially when your team is crap and getting smashed. You're walking onto the field when the result is guaranteed, your teammates have already dropped their heads, and you're trying to get involved in a contest that's already over etc.Ok, there are two ways to view it. But I think players learn more from the defeats & struggles than they learn from the downhill skiing coast to victory. Which lessons do we want our draftees to learn? Learning that nothing comes easy during your first game is a valuable lesson. Earning the right to be on the field & paying your dues is part of it. What coast to victory are you talking about? We've had none of those easy wins this year.I think it would be better to play a debutant from the beginning of the game so they're out there with a 0-0 scoreline, everyone is motivated and trying to win still, and the little 'battles within the game' and still developing - rather than subbing them on when it's all done and dusted, the heads are dropping and the team is just getting whipped for a bit longer with no hope of winning.You can always sub a kid off if they're tired in the 3rd Q.
Quote from: Andyy on Yesterday at 01:40:35 PMQuote from: JP Tiger on Yesterday at 12:36:48 PMQuote from: Hard Roar Tiger on Yesterday at 12:01:39 PMWhy make him a sub - that’s the point. How on earth does it help him or us?This has happened many times, I even see other sides doing the same with their first gamers. Personally I don't think its a bad idea so I don't have a problem with it. Giving the young blokes the sub vest lets them experience the game before they get thrown into it. When they do get a run they are matched up on a bloke who has already run 7kms or so, giving the young bloke an advantage. They can go hard knowing there is only a half or even a quarter left to play. We talk about the importance of development but don't want to see it or have to put up with it! We talk about green shoots but expect them to magically appear on the field as fully grown crops ready to yield fruit ... I can see your point but I just think it's wrong and I'm not convinced having a kid play as the sub does then any favours.I think playing the last 30-40min of a game would be difficult, especially when your team is crap and getting smashed. You're walking onto the field when the result is guaranteed, your teammates have already dropped their heads, and you're trying to get involved in a contest that's already over etc.Ok, there are two ways to view it. But I think players learn more from the defeats & struggles than they learn from the downhill skiing coast to victory. Which lessons do we want our draftees to learn? Learning that nothing comes easy during your first game is a valuable lesson. Earning the right to be on the field & paying your dues is part of it.
Quote from: JP Tiger on Yesterday at 12:36:48 PMQuote from: Hard Roar Tiger on Yesterday at 12:01:39 PMWhy make him a sub - that’s the point. How on earth does it help him or us?This has happened many times, I even see other sides doing the same with their first gamers. Personally I don't think its a bad idea so I don't have a problem with it. Giving the young blokes the sub vest lets them experience the game before they get thrown into it. When they do get a run they are matched up on a bloke who has already run 7kms or so, giving the young bloke an advantage. They can go hard knowing there is only a half or even a quarter left to play. We talk about the importance of development but don't want to see it or have to put up with it! We talk about green shoots but expect them to magically appear on the field as fully grown crops ready to yield fruit ... I can see your point but I just think it's wrong and I'm not convinced having a kid play as the sub does then any favours.I think playing the last 30-40min of a game would be difficult, especially when your team is crap and getting smashed. You're walking onto the field when the result is guaranteed, your teammates have already dropped their heads, and you're trying to get involved in a contest that's already over etc.
Quote from: Hard Roar Tiger on Yesterday at 12:01:39 PMWhy make him a sub - that’s the point. How on earth does it help him or us?This has happened many times, I even see other sides doing the same with their first gamers. Personally I don't think its a bad idea so I don't have a problem with it. Giving the young blokes the sub vest lets them experience the game before they get thrown into it. When they do get a run they are matched up on a bloke who has already run 7kms or so, giving the young bloke an advantage. They can go hard knowing there is only a half or even a quarter left to play. We talk about the importance of development but don't want to see it or have to put up with it! We talk about green shoots but expect them to magically appear on the field as fully grown crops ready to yield fruit ...
Why make him a sub - that’s the point. How on earth does it help him or us?
No less, in a season that is all about development…Just a dumb and shameful decision by the club.
I don't agree with a player being the sub in their debut game. Hated it last year, where it was far too common. But in fairness to the Club this is first one this year, was a terrible decision none the less
Quote from: WilliamPowell on Yesterday at 08:49:04 PMI don't agree with a player being the sub in their debut game. Hated it last year, where it was far too common. But in fairness to the Club this is first one this year, was a terrible decision none the lessNoted, and this made it all the more disappointing for me tbh. I thought they had learned and were moving away from that BS.