Author Topic: Problems at Geelong  (Read 5599 times)

Bulluss

  • Guest
Problems at Geelong
« on: August 30, 2006, 05:22:59 PM »
I have heard from a very good source that there are many problems at Geelong at the moment.

Apparently there is a fair bit of "activity" amongst players/coaching staff and partners of players/coaching staff.

This has obvioulsy caused a fair bit of tension among certain people and things are about to reach boiling point.

Apparently one high profile person from Geelong has already had their wife walk out on them, she was last seen driving past Windy Hill  ;) :shh

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2006, 06:39:35 PM »
There's heaps of rumours coming out of that place. Small town = small talk. Bomber Thompson must be on thin ice now if senior players have lost faith in him. Must be like old times for Otto lol :yep.

Winning the preseason comp has almost become a curse with Carlton and now Geelong falling apart.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Jackstar

  • Guest
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2006, 06:45:21 PM »
I have heard from a very good source that there are many problems at Geelong at the moment.

Apparently there is a fair bit of "activity" amongst players/coaching staff and partners of players/coaching staff.

This has obvioulsy caused a fair bit of tension among certain people and things are about to reach boiling point.

Apparently one high profile person from Geelong has already had their wife walk out on them, she was last seen driving past Windy Hill  ;) :shh



You are correct ! ;)
I wonder who that could be ????
Windy Hill, Home of the mighty Bomber s

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40306
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2006, 07:05:37 PM »
Must be like old times for Otto lol :yep.


I reckon it's all Otto'$ fault   ;D :rollin :lol :wallywink
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2006, 09:26:07 PM »
What's this about Parkin allegedly saying Bomber Thompson is gone?




All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

PuntRdRoar

  • Guest
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2006, 09:33:24 PM »
James Kelly would be a worthwhile target for us especially on an elcheapo player for player deal for a player we dont want.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2006, 09:54:35 PM »
James Kelly would be a worthwhile target for us especially on an elcheapo player for player deal for a player we dont want.

Kelly should have been ours in the first place. He was drafted with the first round pick we traded away to offload Daffy to the Swans  :-X.

You would think we'd need to swap say Hyde (the Cats need to add pace) for Kelly unless a third club got involved. I'd prefer Bartel but that's wishful thinking.

All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2006, 10:12:42 PM »
What problems at Geelong?
Brad's back in training lol


Offline Stephanie

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • I am from Tigerland!
    • My Myspace
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2006, 10:18:33 PM »
What problems at Geelong?
Brad's back in training lol


Bomber: Otto, do 15 reps, 4 times an hour!  :cheers
On victory we strive. Eat 'em alive!

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #9 on: September 20, 2006, 04:54:31 AM »
The Cats are spiralling into further disarray. The good old 100 signature petition. Where have we heard that idea before lol.

Just out of interest, has the RFC increased the number of signatures required to force a EGM via a petition? To allow only 100 people hold 30,000 members effectively to ransom is ridiculous. I had a feeling at the time we were planning to re-make it 5% which would mean you would require 1,500 signatures.
 
Quote
Cats split: Costa under threat
20 September 2006   Herald-Sun
Damian Barrett

 FRANK Costa's control of Geelong Football Club was under enormous pressure last night, with a local businessman calling for a spill of the board.

Denis McMurrich, a former Cats vice-president, said he would demand an extraordinary general meeting be called next month.

McMurrich plans to present Geelong president Costa and Cook with a 250-signature petition next week.

Costa and Cook could not be contacted last night, but a club official confirmed an extraordinary general meeting could be sought under Geelong's constitution provided 100 signatures from members were on a petition.

McMurrich's call came as the Cats were already dealing with a separate petition regarding the club review, lodged with the club by a mystery woman on Monday.

Full article at: http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,20443128%255E20322,00.html
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Moi

  • Guest
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #10 on: September 20, 2006, 10:08:38 AM »
For all the problems they have now, I thought they've run that club pretty well over the last couple of years working their way out of that debt they had.
If all the disharmony is due to one man  ;) and around that club, he's got a lot to answer for.  They should have been playing finals this year.
But who cares? 

Offline Fishfinger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2465
  • You can't put brains in an idiot
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2006, 10:28:28 AM »
The Cats are spiralling into further disarray. The good old 100 signature petition. Where have we heard that idea before lol.

Just out of interest, has the RFC increased the number of signatures required to force a EGM via a petition?
mt, pretty sure the Federal Government introduced legislation last year to stop the vexatious use of the 100 member rule (an increase to 5% was definitely proposed) and that the loophole used to force the RFC EGM was part of the Articles of Association because it was Corporate Law rather than being specifically put in the club constitution .

If the legislation was amended, which I think it was but don't know how to find out find for certain, then the RFC constitution would have altered accordingly and the signatures from disgruntled Geelong fans would be nothing more than just that.
It's 50 of one and half a dozen of the other - Don Scott

Offline Rodgerramjet

  • OER - CONTRIBUTOR
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2001
  • Never cast pearls before swine.
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2006, 02:48:57 PM »
The Geelong football club board have only themselves to blame, they have dallied around this situation with the coach for far too long. a decsion on the coach should have been made weeks ago. the board deserves to be toppled.
The lips of Wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding.

Jackstar

  • Guest
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2006, 03:36:16 PM »
Sounds like another club we all know 2 years ago ::)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Problems at Geelong
« Reply #14 on: September 20, 2006, 05:19:14 PM »
The Cats are spiralling into further disarray. The good old 100 signature petition. Where have we heard that idea before lol.

Just out of interest, has the RFC increased the number of signatures required to force a EGM via a petition?
mt, pretty sure the Federal Government introduced legislation last year to stop the vexatious use of the 100 member rule (an increase to 5% was definitely proposed) and that the loophole used to force the RFC EGM was part of the Articles of Association because it was Corporate Law rather than being specifically put in the club constitution .

If the legislation was amended, which I think it was but don't know how to find out find for certain, then the RFC constitution would have altered accordingly and the signatures from disgruntled Geelong fans would be nothing more than just that.

Thanks FF. The site with the Corporations Act still has both options but it may be out of date or the RFC may have altered the club constitution. Let's hope so.

http://scaletext.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/3/3448/0/PA004070.htmhttp://scaletext.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/3/3448/0/PA004090.htm &
http://scaletext.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/3/3448/0/PA004200.htm
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd