The original idea was to concentrate the sport's support in each major mainland city. The NBL has done something similar now with franchises such as Melbourne United in their revamped league. NSL crowds were small because they were spread across multiple clubs and most NSL clubs had small following on gameday (South Melb the exception although I don't remember them reaching 5 figures except during finals). Perth Glory (17k crowds in their early days) and then Adelaide Utd were glimpses of what one-'state' team per city could deliver. They became the model for the A-league. John O'Neill being a Rugby guy obviously was familiar with such a set-up too. The exception was CCM because it was in a region void of professional teams from the other footy codes. NZ only got a gig because the FFA needed an 8th club
.
It's a catch 22 in some ways. The game wants/needs more clubs in the A-league to reduce repetition of fixtures which increases interest across the whole season, but finding clubs that generate the necessary crowds and tv ratings is difficult. Hence, why the FFA wants more clubs in Melb, Syd & Bris to generate more derbies and bigger crowds thanks to both sets of fans in attendance (such as happens in the AFL). However, will that actually bring in new supporters and increase attendances (eg; WSW) or will these new clubs, be it old NSL or new franchises, be small clubs that dilute and spread thinly existing support (which is what happened in the NSL)?
By the way, apparently Queensland Rugby Union are going to redevelop Ballymore and want an A-league team to play there if Brisbane gains a second team in the planned expansion.
---------------------
Anyway, a 2-1 derby victory last night has us only a point off 3rd
. Good to see Broxham and Berisha make up for costly errors with the assists. The bad news though for us is George had to go off injured. Hope it isn't too bad
.